Removed room ownership from those that haven't been regulars for a while.

Uhh. replacements. I nominate me.

@PaulWhite now I have the sudden need to speak more

@EvanCarroll We still have 12 ROs so I think we're OK for the time being, but thank you for the offer.

god i hate stupid obstinate users. in the abstract. I don't mind smart and obstinate or stupid and good willed. but fuuu.

@PaulWhite in other words it's working OK?

@JackDouglas db<>fiddle? Yes.

I mean the dbo. function thingy in particular…

@JoeObbish for now, please post an answer on the meta page with the bug or feature request: meta.dba.stackexchange.com/questions/2686/…

@JackDouglas Yes. That dbo. is required.

@McNets yes, I guess — whichever you prefer

@PaulWhite you can delete yper's msg, I got it thanks!

I would but I'm on mobile

Cheers

No worries.

@JoeObbish are you on Twitter?

@MaxVernon No worries. It isn't a state secret ;)

Does it work if there is more than one coincidence of: t2.c1 like '%' + t1.Name + '%' dba.stackexchange.com/a/166041/110455?

hrmmm

This is a fun problem dba.stackexchange.com/q/58653/2639

3 years old