« first day (408 days earlier)      last day (4445 days later) » 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 21:00

JNK
1:16 AM
@AaronBertrand it's been suggested to make it tag-related.
and also yes i think you are being targeted
unfortunately whoever is doing it is being clever and not downvoting with enough frequency to make it something that will be easily caught
 
@JNK yes but I don't know why there has to be a limit. Why not have all the SE sites in the list?
 
JNK
its a design limitation
doesnt mean it cant be fixed, they just don't see it as a major issue
 
@JNK using the tags to sort by relevance would be a plus, but surely they can easily generate a list of sites and populate the list.
 
JNK
i think partly its to limit migrations to the non-core sites
so a mod does it
 
@JNK well if a lot of folks start flagging for migration the mods might get sick of dealing with it manually. Does SE still not consider dba.se a "core" site?
 
JNK
1:20 AM
potentially 5 wrong-minded people could flood a smaller site
by core i mean high-traffic
we are getting there but arent like programmers or su
SU/SF/SO are the "Trinity"
first 3 official sites
 
@JNK and yes, whoever is doing it is gaming the system and winning. So far. Though the down-vote spree last week seems to have been automatically corrected.
 
JNK
(trilogy maybe?)
then theres meta and programmers
they are all higher volume and high-frequency for migrations
 
@JNK I flagged a question this week but was told there wasn't anything they could do about it. Think it's a canned response because it was worded quite like something I read in here or on meta recently.
 
JNK
yeah
"The issue was researched but no evidence was found to support it"
i always flag if i get 2 or 3 in quick succession too
declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it
 
And that's ok, I get it, they can't investigate. But in cases where there is a question that has multiple answers and only one has down-votes (and it also has up-votes)? Something should be triggered behind the scenes to investigate without involving a human.
 
JNK
1:23 AM
i kind of agree
but the tags we dont look at are crazy high volume
have you ever watched the php or iphone or android or c# tags?
and the folks in those communities aren't always super bright
so i have to imagine that actually happens with great frequency
have you see the SEDE?
if not i think its something you would be interested to play with some time
they have a SQL console that is connected to the databases for the sites
you can query the databases directly to get answers to your questions :)
 
Here is my decline: declined - Unfortunately we cannot do this. Keep an eye on it; if it gets ridiculous email the team@stackoverflow. Sorry to decline in order to tell you this.
 
JNK
you know how to do a SQL query right? </sarcasm>
oh that might not be canned
i haven't gotten that one before
 
Ooh, maybe I'm special. Maybe there's some way they can see that I was targeted recently and the system did catch it, and they pay closer attention.
 
JNK
most of the mods read meta frequently
 
Anyway it's all very childish and pointless.
 
JNK
1:27 AM
yeah thats the internet for you
 
Ah, that's true, they might have seen me whining about it. So I guess it's possible they did investigate in that case.
Or remembered me when I set the flag more recently.
 
JNK
very possible. the mods are actually pretty good
the volume of flags they deal with is fairly nuts
like some will do 300+ flags a day
 
so do we compare them to chuck norris or jon skeet
who I think are the same person
 
JNK
they might be
that could be one of their powers
hi simon
so dont get frustrated too much
though i know its a PITA for you especially to spend so much time and then get jerked around
 
feels like the cafeteria in grade school some days.
 
JNK
1:32 AM
not far off
i actually kind of hate it sometimes
like how you can get rep by just asking questiions
and then use it to downvote people who know things
ive learned a lot though so its been a worthwhile experience for me
 
yeah I've re-learned several things by seeing how other folks solve the same problems I've been solving for ages.
and then just life things, like don't get too hung up trying to help people.
 
JNK
and overall the quality of participation is very high
 
especially with the number of ingrates and numbnuts.
 
JNK
i cant think of any other place on the internet you can talk to the level of people you talk to in this network
 
yes I agree. I just seem to attract the dregs too.
 
JNK
1:35 AM
i mean i can ask questions of people like you and gbn and remus and get quick responses
also kiwi
its kind of incredible if you think about it
 
I bet I had some argument on here three years ago and someone is still getting back at me via dozens of sock puppet accounts
 
JNK
i mean eric lippert answers c# questions
very possible
 
it is pretty cool. Now if only we could create an SE site where only cool and smart people were allowed.
:-)
 
JNK
isnt that what dba is for?
 
we'll see. I suspect as it gets more popular it will change.
 
JNK
1:36 AM
im sure it will
itll be a good problem to have though
 
Especially if we are inadvertently driving morons over here by aggressively migrating questions. :-)
 
JNK
i think it could become the go-to place for sql questions
yeah I know
it cuts both ways
 
all right I'm out. Good chatting with you as always. Gots to pay attention to the wife.
 
JNK
gnight
me too
 
I've been stuck at 19977 for a while, I'm going to stop watching the pot and let it boil while I'm away.
:-)
 
JNK
1:38 AM
ill toss you a few
 
no no that's not what I was going for
 
JNK
they will be honest
im sure there are good posts you made that i havent seen today
example:
3
A: NVARCHAR(?) for Email addresses in SQL Server

Aaron BertrandI've always used 320 based on your latter calculation. It doesn't cost you anything to allow more, unless people abuse it and stuff junk in there. It could cost you to allow less, as you'll have a frustrating users if they have legitimately longer e-mail addresses and now you'll have to go back a...

 
check out the drawn out discussion I had with this guy who kept changing his requirements. He's going to go with bit flipping instead.
stackoverflow.com/questions/9301892/sql-2005-tracking-changed-fields-without-maintaining-history/
Hmm, why didn't that paste right?
0
Q: SQL 2005: Tracking changed fields without maintaining history

AsdfgI have a table named Books which contains some columns. ColumnNames: BookId, BookName, BookDesc, xxx I want to track changes for certain columns. I dont have to maintain history of old value and new value. I just want to track that value is changed or not. What is the best way to achieve thi...

 
JNK
not sure
 
There we go.
 
JNK
1:40 AM
yeah i watched that one
asked about your downvote
ok 20k now
 
Oh yeah, I see that now. Sorry lose track of context quickly.
thanks, talk to you soon
 
JNK
k later
 
 
2 hours later…
3:45 AM
Attention paid, hockey game over, now I'm bored. Questions trickle in slowly outside of east coast business hours.
I've looked through unanswered queue on dba.se but it's slim pickings (for me, at least)
Over on SO there are over 46K unanswered questions under the android tag. I should start adding answers to each one telling them that whatever problem they're solving would be easier on an iPhone.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:52 AM
Haha, and you think you get personal downvotes now :v
I'm not sure which group would be worse to piss off - android fanboys or apple fanboys
 
 
1 hour later…
7:15 AM
You mean fanbois
 
gbn
7:53 AM
Morning all
@AaronBertrand Most of the SQL Server and MySQL ones are covered.
 
8:08 AM
Evening lads
 
gbn
8:30 AM
For those who can see this, 36 posts with close votes: dba.stackexchange.com/review/…
 
9:05 AM
Morning
@gbn Still to much of a pleb. Mod tools is 10,000 rep, I think.
@SimonRigharts Morning
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells Yeah, mod tools is 10k rep
which means it's the actual mods, gbn, Rolando and Mark S that can see it
 
@SimonRigharts Maybe I could scrounge another 7,000 worth of my old q's from Stackoverflow :)
 
haha, I'd have to find 9300 which would be a bit of a challenge considering my SO rep is like 300 or so
 
 
2 hours later…
gbn
11:00 AM
 
@gbn Yes - pretty much pure database.
 
gbn
ta, flagged
 
11:19 AM
I could answer this question but I think it's really an application development question - move to Stackoverflow?
 
gbn
11:43 AM
This 2 rooms is confusing me now
 
Well, we're already starting to talk bollocks in the other room, so I think that separating the mod chat from the bollocks is probably an exercise in futility.
 
gbn
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yep
 
@gbn The VTC room might be a good place just to store a link farm of questions under discussion.
 
gbn
I'll admit defeat. probably wouldn't work anyway
 
One thing I did find about it is that the volume of bollocks here makes hunting up the old links a bit of a pain. If the links get stashed in the VTC room we can at least find them.
 
gbn
11:58 AM
We can rename it any time
 
I don't think the name matters so much. As long as it doesn't get too flooded with bollocks it can be used as a link farm by anyone wanting to make use of it that way.
One could put an admonishment in the room description stating that some people use this to keep links and to please keep the bollocks to The Heap.
Proposal added, by the way.
 
gbn
12:51 PM
ta
 
JNK
1:11 PM
bollock bollocks bollocks bollocks
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells I'm thinking about updating the faq now
I've had enough of not updating the faq
 
@JackDouglas Fair enough. I think we're all pretty much in agreement about the content. Really, most of the debate in the meta question has been about implementation details.
 
1:31 PM
@JackDouglas - if you look at the rate of change stats for dba.se it's up to an appreciable fraction of the activity on Serverfault. 7% of the page views, 30% of the new 200k+ users, 15% of the questions per day.
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells I'm gunning for p.se :-)
 
@JackDouglas We're up to nearly half the activity on that already.
Less meta questions.
 
We'll be doing incredibly well to get up to that level - but it depends on the quality of answers we offer. IMO that is our strength but attracting more experts to the site is always going to help
 
@JackDouglas I think there's an optimal size range for stackexchange sites. Too many questions and you get drowned out. Either questions go unanswered or people get disappointed by answering something and getting no upvotes or maybe just 1-2.
 
JNK
I think we are doing pretty well
 
1:34 PM
Too few questions and nobody bothers looking.
 
JNK
site seems to have taken off in the past month or two
i just noticed Mike E is in here
@MikaelEriksson hi!
 
Hi JNK :) I'm lurking but you can obviously see me :)
 
In the optimal range we want to see enough activity to keep people intersted, and get enough upvotes that (like it or not) people are attracted to the site to answer questions. This will attract good quality answerers, which will in turn promote the reputation of dba.se as the place to go to get database questions answered.
We're already starting to get a bit of attention from A-listers, and my subjective observation is that my answers in the past few weeks have gotten more votes than I would have expected to see for the same thing on Stackoverflow.
 
JNK
@MikaelEriksson glad to see you on the site
always appreciate your insightful answers on SO
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells me too
 
@JNK Thanks
 
JNK
1:37 PM
we also are getting high-"hotness" qs I think in large part because we are active in here
 
This leads me to believe that dba.se has gotten enough critical mass to kick off the self-reinforcing feedback loop that will make the site successful.
 
JNK
which brings more traffic
 
As a corollary, apart from the occasional meta post from someone whining about a migrated question, it suggests that the site is becoming successful in spite of confusion about the name.
I wonder how many of p.se's meta posts are from people whining about questions migrated from SO?
 
JNK
used to be a LOT
also, someone else weigh in here plz:
0
Q: Database structure for a mail list

generalI am designing a database structure for a mail list The data i need to record is the mail receiver data: Since the mail receiver data is not predefine, it cause a problem: for example: some of the receiver have name, mail address, phone no while the others have name, birthdate, mail address, g...

 
@JNK Yes, perusing his answers list shows a lot of quality material.
 
JNK
1:43 PM
op wants to use EAV basically to account for missing fields
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yep. He's one of those "quietly answer really well and don't make a bunch of noise otherwise" types. Not one to berate people in comments
 
@MikaelEriksson We'd be happy to have you over here. It's not just dba's here - the scope of the site does cover database design and advanced database development.
 
JNK
i am for sure not a DBA
 
I'm not a dba either. I'm just a data mon^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HBusiness Intelligence consultant.
 
JNK
tosses a banana
 
1:49 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells Are you @Concerned about the exact text of the faq update? I've taken quite a few liberties to try and make the visual "at a glance" appearance better.
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells - Thanks, I don't stumble in here too often. Not really comfortable answering the more advanced dba stuff.
 
@MikaelEriksson Advanced SQL development questions are well and truly on-topic here. The line is really where it merges into application development.
 
@MikaelEriksson Hi, good to have you over here :-)
You seem to know a bit about T-SQL is that your day job?
 
@JackDouglas If you look at the variations on the B.I. Merge proposal we came to much the same landing about the bullet points. The only difference of opinion was about how to express the answer to 'Why did my programming question wind up on a dba site' questions.
That's just an implementation detail. As long as the FAQ addresses that effectively it doesn't matter what the wording is.
 
I think pretty much any T-SQL Q will always be on topic both here and on SO - Advanced SQL on the other hand I think will all be migrated here in the end
 
1:53 PM
@Jack Thanks. DB-Design writing SP's, middle tire parts using Delphi and architect stuff is what I do.
 
JNK
basic stuff is fine in SO tbh
i don't know if we really want it here
 
@JNK I wouldn't migrate it if it turned up unless it really was an application development question (e.g. how do I do xxxx with ADO.Net).
@MikaelEriksson I've answered plenty of database design questions here, and @gbn reckons he's flagging that sort of stuff for migration already.
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells We did, but take a look and you'll see I've trimmed various sections to make them fit on one line and made some other cosmetic changes too.
 
@JackDouglas I can see it. Where are we with implementing the link farm idea? Did that go anywhere?
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells we need to do that, yes
11
Q: FAQ Rewrite - Round 3

Chris SThe proposed FAQ has been officially rejected by the power that be. They had an interesting choice of words for the previous edit. The crux of their objection is that it should be understandable in 30 seconds. The newest proposal, which has the most egregiously offensive parts removed already (a...

not the SE network vetoed the new SF faq that was modelled on ours
If anything I think ours is still far to wordy
 
2:04 PM
@JackDouglas So we're definitely thinking of doing that and will at some point. Editorially, can I suggest:
•client-side programming - particularly application development (ask on Stack Overflow instead)
That was one thing I thought would make the intent of the previous incarnations of the FAQ a bit clearer.
The main reasoning behind that is that some client-side programming for administrative or system level stuff would be reasonably on-topic for this site.
Even just integrating tools like SQL*Plus into shell scripts to do various tasks.
I don't really want people thinking that they shouldn't ask that sort of thing here.
Per the SF FAQ posting, are we placing specific documentation about topicality on the meta.dba.se site?
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yes, it looks like that is what they want
Can you look again - I've done some more trimming and style changes to improve the chance of someone getting something from it in 30 seconds
 
@JackDouglas I've got no issue with doing that, especially since the discussion about this sort of thing will reside on the meta site.
@JackDouglas Did you change it in the last few minutes or is it just what I looked at just now?
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells I've been fiddling away continuously for 15 minutes or so :-)
 
What did you just change?
Actually, this comment on the SF FAQ discussion:
An important point that I didn't know until after being told: The FAQ is a guide for new people, not the basis for topicality decisions. THAT belongs to the faq tag. – sysadmin1138♦ 17 hours ago
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells that's wrong I think :-)
 
JNK
2:19 PM
@JackDouglas when can we get our name changed?
 
@JackDouglas Why?
 
the faq obviously is the basis for topicality decisions
 
JNK
its been discussed for months
 
@JNK when we have a majority in favour :-)
 
JNK
OK if I post a new question for an up/down vote on db.stackexchange.com?
 
2:20 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells but it is better as a summarized version with a longer meta post backing it up
 
@JackDouglas It certainly wasn't obvious to me - If the Meta FAQ is supposed to be the basis for topicality discussions then the main site FAQ should really make this explicit somewhere.
 
JNK
We need to get it decided sooner rather than later
 
@JNK I like it but IIRC it was rejected by the network
 
JNK
the more traffic we get the more confusing it becomes
do you know why?
 
@JackDouglas Do we have candidates for a new name with some sort of official recognition somewhere?
(i.e. is something happening on this that I haven't heard about?)
@JackDouglas - I see you've added the B.I. stuff in now.
I like what you've done. That's pretty good, I think.
Grammar:
•Data Warehousing: data-warehouse design, etl processing and related eg: master-data-management.
Maybe 'related topics', 'related areas' or something like that.
 
2:28 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells has to be shorter not longer :-) open to suggestions though?
Data Warehousing: data-warehouse design, etl processing, master-data-management etc
?
not really sure what MDM is
Hi @jcolebrand
 
hiyooo
 
we are meddling with the faq
have you seen the SF on their proposed changes?
 
@JackDouglas A MDM tool is something that manages canonical data items across multiple sources. It will do things like fuzzy matching of customer records and maintaing canonical reference data sets with mappings to individual applicaiton reference data. Mainly relevant because Microsoft is now shipping a MDM tool with SQL Server.
 
Is it on the same level as etl and DW design?
I'm guessing not
 
You integrate the output of the MDM tool into ETL processing to do canonical mappings.
 
2:32 PM
@JackDouglas not yet, link me?
 
@JackDouglas No, but now MS is punting a MDM tool with SQL Server and we're becoming the 'official' business intelligence SE site it's probably a good idea to make it explicit somehow.
 
@jcolebrand here you go
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells on the meta faq?
 
@JackDouglas That might be a good place to put it. It's a bit of a side topic. There are a whole lof of peripheral topics like maybe dashboarding tools and data profiling that would be on-topic for data warehousing but probably don't need their own spot at the top of the FAQ.
If you want to keep all the bullet points to one line you could split reporting and OLAP into their own bullet points.
•Business Intelligence and Reporting: reporting tools, queries and ROLAP tooling.
•OLAP cube design, tuning and queries including mdx questions.
@JackDouglas On a related note, has a decision been made at some official level to include B.I. topics in scope for dba.se?
 
JNK
So the renaming happened here:
12
A: Why is Area 51 proposal for Database renamed to Database Administrators?

Robert Cartaino"Databases" is nebulous term, used by many, many professional disciplines. So we had to become absolutely crystal clear about the primary audience for this site. Yes, a clearer title could have be chosen early on to indicate the target audience… preferably by the community creating the pro...

 
2:53 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yes, I think we need to make SE aware.
Have we actually been migrating in any BI Q?
I think we should definitely build up some BI Q on site before mass-migrating them in
 
JNK
are there many BI Q?
ive seen a number of SSRS/SSAS in the tags I check
 
@JackDouglas I think we might then consider pulling out some of the tags but keep the rest of it, and we need to get some work going on meta for that FAQ that we talked about before.
 
@jcolebrand 29 with SSIS tags, 8x reporting-services, 25xSSAS, 15xETL, 11xOLAP, 11xbusiness-intelligence.
 
Ok, so we need some FAQs for our site, above and beyond the 30 second intro FAQ. What things do we need in a FAQ? Do we already have that listed somewhere? Time to goto meta.
 
On Stackoverflow: 500xMDX, 2624xSSIS, 652xssas, 144xanalysis-services, 1305xreporting, 3911xreporting-services, 381xOLAP
Unanswered on stackoverflow: 236xSSAS (36%), 643xSSIS (25%), 1,362xreporting-services (35%), 130xOLAP (34%), 66xETL (20%), 188xMDX (37%)
All of these tags have considerably higher unanswered rates than the average across Stackoverflow (about 18% IIRC).
 
3:05 PM
Wow, interesting.
Also, our unanswered rate is looking kinda slim ... 92% :-\
 
JNK
its getting better
honestly a LOT of those will never be answered and should be deleted
i was skimming through them
 
Why should they be deleted?
 
JNK
high numbers are basically poor Qs that we ask for feedback on and never got
 
If they need improvement, at least leave a guiding comment for the asker
 
JNK
OP is like "How do I do XYZ"
 
3:07 PM
@JNK Do you mean the unanswered ones on dba.se?
 
JNK
Comments along the lines of "Please clarify what you are after"
 
THOSE should be put into the VtC room
after a couple weeks we can revisit easily
 
JNK
then no activity for a year
 
with the VtC literally only being Q
We can link from one room to the other
 
@jcolebrand ^H^H^H^H^HBollocks :D
 
3:08 PM
in Fail: Vote to ellipsis, 2 hours ago, by ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells
@Jcolebrand - want to join in the bollocks?
See how I linked cross-room?
So you can post the Q there, then post here to discuss it
 
@jcolebrand From your presence here I think we can infer the answer ;-}
 
yes, it does remove the immediacy of conversation there about a Q
I'm never against a list of "needs TLC"
We could keep a list on meta about "needs TLC" if you guys would like to do that instead. I'm pretty sure I've seen other sites go about that
 
@jcolebrand That's exactly what I had in mind in my answer to @gbn's meta question
 
JNK
harder to manage than a chat room imo
 
@JNK The main reason I suggested that is that the amount of boll^H^H^H^Hchat here will push the links off the top pretty quickly. If you restrict the VTC stuff to the links they will be much easier to find later.
 
JNK
3:11 PM
true
 
And it turns out that you can't star your own postings in chat.
 
I don't see the problem with a long list of Q on meta in a single CW answer to a post, so that we can all keep an eye on things.
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells you didn't read my reply did you?
it turns out you can if you're a room owner
 
@jcolebrand Yes, I did.
 
but please let's remember, we don't just need to close close close
as convenient as that is
 
@jcolebrand Which doesn't really help if you want multiple people to be able to post links in the room.
 
3:12 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells you can have as many room owners as you want
and any one room owner can add other room owners
 
JNK
1
Q: Transactional replication subscription not showing in SQL Server Management Studio

RagnaRockI tried to set up 3 SQL instances, one publisher 2 subscribers, to replicate data between them. I did it using the GUI wizard and all went fine in the Publisher: my publication appears under "Local Publications" and if I expand it, it lists the 2 subscriptions of the other 2 instances. But in t...

1
Q: Migration from SQL Server 2005 to 2008 R2 - What about roles?

Andy.lCurrently planning a migration from SQL Server 2005 to 2008 R2. I've covered my bases by using Microsoft's migration script for logins and password (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918992) and scripted out all jobs. All databases will be physically moved by doing a detach/attach. But I've realize...

1
Q: MySQL Very Slow for REALLY Simple Operations

Pez CuckowSomething appears to be wrong with my MySQL even with very, very simple operations on almost empty (~100) tables E.g. DROP TABLE IF EXISTS hookup_gender takes 10+ seconds mysql> show processlist; +----+---------------+---------------------+---------------+---------+------+-------------------...

all dead for months
 
@jcolebrand That helps, but I'm not sure we want to do that with The Heap, though.
 
JNK
with no response to comments
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells the VtC room
 
Posting the links in another room will still be better.
 
3:13 PM
@JNK the one that was migrated from SO with a self-comment from the OP wants an answer, and the OP isn't even on the site.
 
JNK
yep
 
@jcolebrand OK.
 
> How can I easily move these or the memberships to the new server?
That isn't already answered?
 
JNK
I think we should be able to auto-close or auto-delete any Q older than 6 months with no answers where the OP isn't on the site
 
Isn't the answer "You have to script that information out ..."
 
JNK
3:14 PM
b/c they will never be answered
 
@JNK Probably a feature request for meta.so
 
@JNK propose it on metaso
 
JNK
OK
 
You I can suggest that to, because you get the stacks :p
Lesser users I wouldn't ;-)
 
JNK
lol
we will see what happens here
0
Q: Add option for mods to auto-close/auto-delete abandoned questions

JNKWe were having a discussion today about old questions on DBA.SE. Basically we have a lot of questions that either were migrated and not followed by the OP or that were asked long ago and never followed up on. Some examples: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Is it possible/feasible to add some ...

 
3:30 PM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells I don't mind the major ones spilling over as it draws attention to them. BI is major right now because of the merge - after 6 months we can trim it to fit on a line
 
stupid work is interfering with me getting meta Q written/proposed ...
 
@JackDouglas If the detailed scope stuff gets moved to the meta FAQ then it could come down to something like 'Business Intelligence: reporting , ROLAP systems and OLAP cube design.'
Or even just 'Business Intelligence: Reporting , ROLAP systems and OLAP cubes.'
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells and have that line be a link to the meta FAQ Q yes
 
@jcolebrand That sort of thing - I was talking about the current FAQ draft wording where the business intelligence line is quite long. You could split it into two lines, one for reporting and one for OLAP cubes. In the longer term - especially once business intelligence gets established in dba.se - the line could be shorteded to something like the example.
Then, you can link the line on the main FAQ to something on meta that discusses it in more detail.
My original issue with the FAQ wording was to find a way to make it clear that certain development related questions were in scope for dba.se - not necessarily just in the context of business intelligence topics, but it was pertinent to some B.I. related use cases that I had in mind.
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells 2 lines is too much long term - it is a small % of the site and should be a small % of the faq
I've taken the scalpel to the whole thing and I'm still thinking we need to cut off 50%
 
3:43 PM
For example, SSAS has .Net API called AMO which can be used for managing administrative tasks on a cube, Oracle has SQL*Loader which can be embedded in shell scripts and suchlike.
 
How about ultimately combining BI and DW on one line as they are related(ish)
 
@JackDouglas I'd do a line for data warehouse design and shorten the reporting and olap line to something like:
'Business Intelligence: Reporting , ROLAP systems and OLAP cubes.'
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells you mean now?
 
@JackDouglas Not necessarily now, but when it seems appropriate.
If you imagine a couple of bullet points:
•Data Warehousing including data-warehouse design and etl processing
•'Business Intelligence: Reporting , ROLAP systems and OLAP cubes.
I think that's concise and pretty descriptive. I'm not sure that we need to explicitly mention MDX by name if we have a link to a more detailed Meta FAQ.
Did you see my question tag stats:
dba.se: 29 with SSIS tags, 8x reporting-services, 25xSSAS, 15xETL, 11xOLAP, 11xbusiness-intelligence.
On Stackoverflow: 500xMDX, 2624xSSIS, 652xssas, 144xanalysis-services, 1305xreporting, 3911xreporting-services, 381xOLAP
Unanswered on stackoverflow: 236xSSAS (36%), 643xSSIS (25%), 1,362xreporting-services (35%), 130xOLAP (34%), 66xETL (20%), 188xMDX (37%)
All of these tags have considerably higher unanswered rates than the average across Stackoverflow (about 18% IIRC).
But, if you want to trim the FAQ now, I think those two lines would make it pretty clear.
• Data Warehousing including data-warehouse design and etl processing
• Business Intelligence: Reporting , ROLAP systems and OLAP cubes.
My original wording was substantially to ensure that the text had an appropriate list of buzzwords to get picked up by search engines.
Hello?
 
Hello :-)
 
3:52 PM
@JackDouglas Sorry for the wall of text. Did you follow?
 
yup - I think so
dont worry about search engines - we don't want people to arrive on the faq from Google anyway
we want them to arrive on the perfect answer to their question :-)
and Google knows we are here
 
In that case the two lines in the FAQ are probably enough to make the scope clear.
 
lets do it
 
It mentions data warehouse design and ETL, and most of the major types of front-end tools for B.I. systems
@JackDouglas I'm happy with that.
Can you make tags for reporting, ETL, ROLAP, OLAP and data warehouse where they don't exist?
Sorry, I think all the tags are present. Forget my previous line.
 
the way to make a tag is by tagging a question :-)
 
3:55 PM
@JackDouglas I think they're already there.
 
it would be really good to have top quality concise Tag Wiki summaries for each tag on the faq - can you take care of all the BI ones?
 
Just making sure that all the tags mentioned in the FAQ actually exists.
@JackDouglas How much rep do you need to do that?
 
"Wiki excerpts are concise and contain an objective description of the tag"
 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 21:00

« first day (408 days earlier)      last day (4445 days later) »