« first day (2724 days earlier)      last day (2130 days later) » 

7:12 AM
evening and morning
 
morning
 
7:24 AM
morning
 
7:44 AM
Morning
 
8:23 AM
Morning
 
9:21 AM
Linkedin just gave a notification in the messaging box that I can now reply to recruiters with animated gifs :)
 
9:41 AM
morning
 
 
1 hour later…
10:47 AM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yes, it's the original backup date (it's in backupset, not restorehistory)
morning
 
11:01 AM
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells yep, correct, you can see it with restore headeronly
 
 
1 hour later…
12:30 PM
 
12:55 PM
@dezso Why not?
I mean it's 50/50, but the fact you asked about the approval makes me think you have a strong objection?
 
@PaulWhite well, that was not the only bit to change. Not to mention that at some point the preferred way was not to show the [R]DBMS in the title (which might be subject to disagreement). It was also not the first such edit from the same user.
it's not a strong objection, just a normal one
 
Gotcha, thanks
 
also, I had to take the longer way to push my edits, because someone was faster to approve than I (well, I had to go out to buy some cakes)
 
Cakes should always take priority I agree
 
1:20 PM
@dezso it seemed like a reasonable edit. if i knew you were also making edits i would have rejected it, but i don't think there's an indicator for that?
 
@sp_BlitzErik no, there isn't
 
1:44 PM
afternoon
 
2:22 PM
I just had to help coworker run a batch file that takes a while to execute, he asked how he'd know it finished (When he gets a new prompt obviously). Sheesh
 
A_V
Hello, I've got this query which has really high I/O on an index
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=B1MWfkuZ7
wondering if that's okay, I don't look at enough query plans to know if that's normal to have 99.6% of the query's I/O happen on an index
0
Q: High IO on index, is there a more performant solution?

A_VI've got this query which used to take minutes to run and now takes like 6 seconds but it runs a thousands of time a day so I'd like to make it faster. https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=B1MWfkuZ7 It seems that over 99% of the I/O during this query is happening on one clustered index sc...

 
0
Q: Separate tag for [set-returning-functions]

Erwin BrandstetterI noticed that set-returning-functions has been made a synonym of functions. (Paul White♦, Sep 29 at 13:33, if I read https://dba.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms correctly. I am not too happy with this, since functions returning a set exhibit a family of problems distinct from plain functions an...

 

« first day (2724 days earlier)      last day (2130 days later) »