@Shalvenay Ummmm... licks finger. puts finger in the air It wouldn't? Wait. Bother air currents... Ummm.... They'd be able to do it with some not-tiny-but-not-massive amount of practise?
I wanted to know about construction of possible physics/theory of subspace/hyperspace (and other stuff like that). Basically a question that people would construct the underlying physics of.
Though I have a distinct feeling it would be off-topic..
Seems to me like a constructive subjective question. Constructive, meaning, on-topic. Subjective, meaning, off-topic. So.....
That requires some effort to answer :(. But basically, I would simply ask, inserting some constraints, and putting notes that would indicate the answer I would prefer, and how I'll choose the best answer.
I think I'll just not ask. It is easier and simpler. And it is preferable than spending 1hr of my time writing what a consider to be a 'good question', just to get it closed, like it happened sometimes.
@Physicist137 Chat is a good way to get some quick feedback, but if you ever have a draft ready and are unsure you could check out our Sandbox on Meta to get some feedback and refining the draft before you post it on the Main Site.
@Physicist137 To answer this kind of question completely is absurdly hard. Occasionally, someone will ask questions like "what happens if I remove conservation of momentum from physics". The question are answered either in the broadest/abstract terms or is closed for being too broad. What is often missed is how colossally interconnected everything is.