RELOAD!

[Zomis/Games] 4 commits. 2 opened issues. 1 closed issue. 2 issue comments. 69 additions. 33 deletions.

[Minesweeper] Games Played: 144, Bombs Used: 84, Moves Performed: 18505, New Users: 15

I just had a couple happy accidents.

@IvenBach twins?

btw I don't think we're supposed to call them accidents anymore...

@brug Isn't what Bob Ross use when he makes mistakes? I'm sure Iven is not talking about twins but he maybe have done some painting or something?

@Marc-Andre hahaha yeah. I was just having a lark intentionally misunderstanding his statement and then making it out like he said a faux pas. I don't think he has twins. But if you read the sentence with the intention of reading the word accident as a child that was unplanned, then it kinda sounds like he just had twins, no?

@brug I didn't think you were joking. I thought you were being serious :O ! And no he doesn't have twins I think he have only a daughter ? But yeah if you take accidents as a kid twins could make sense. But to couple is not limited to only two (here in quebec you can use : Va me chercher une couple de biere : which would get translated to more or less Go get me a small numbers of beers)

@Marc-Andre In English, to couple something is to join two things together. There is a strong implication of two when you use that word, although it can be used to mean more than two. If you want a generic term for "three or more" that still isn't many then few is good.

@brug Yeah I kinda know it's just old reflex from the use here in Quebec! Thanks for the clarification

😎

^--- My "I might be talking too cocky" face.

A couple = two.
A few = 3+ (generally 3-6)
Several = 7-10
A handful = 10-20 (small items like screws)
A lot = 30-50

@IvenBach Reminds me of the words used in Heroes of Might and Magic 3 for groups of enemies.

Few, several, lots, horde, throng...

Hey everyone! Have a nice Monday all!

@SimonForsberg Splunk Alert: MFE Long SQL Query - [max(runtime):134648, avg(runtime):134648, min(runtime):134648]

@Marc-Andre Likewise

I'm doing refactoring stuff again... trying to add support for replays without database, so that files or in-memory could be used.

And it feels a bit like I got stuck... there's sooo many pieces that has to fit together

How do you approach that? Do you add some game state/replay provider interface and an implementation using the database?

@M.Doerner Yes. This is the current interface I'm working with:

open class GameplayCallbacks<T : Any> {
    open fun startState(setStateCallback: (GameSituationState) -> Unit) {/* empty by default */}
    open fun startedState(playerCount: Int, config: Any, state: GameSituationState) {/* empty by default */}
    open fun onPreMove(actionIndex: Int, action: Actionable<T, Any>, setStateCallback: (GameSituationState) -> Unit) {/* empty by default */}
    open fun onMove(actionIndex: Int, action: Actionable<T, Any>, actionReplay: ActionReplay) {/* empty by default */}

I can't say that I am happy with this layer of complexity though.

Monking