« first day (13 days earlier)      last day (3280 days later) » 

1:20 AM
Congratulations to @MonicaCellio for becoming a 1K user.
 
@Andy thank you! Thanks for the edit approvals!
@Andy, while you're here -- can we please rename to ? I can't do it via a retag because it detects a substring, so the only way to do it is to use a temp variable (which would be a little disruptive).
 
Done.
 
Thanks.
 
You're welcome.
 
Sorry about the front page there; I hadn't realized how many retaggings I was doing intermixed with tag wikis.
 
1:47 AM
@MonicaCellio do you need a mod to help with retagging or are you doing some edits on a case-by-case basis?
I almost said "base-by-base case"
:D
 
@AnnonomusPenguin no, your basar belong to you, not me. :-)
 
@AnnonomusPenguin cake-by-cake basis - the most delicious kind of them all
 
@AnnonomusPenguin I was going through the tags list looking for near-duplicates, too-specialized subsets, and that sort of thing. Where there were just one or two questions involved, I retagged the questions. Some of the larger problem tags have already been raised on meta. I was just tidying up. (I also wrote some wikis, some in response to discussions in here about certain tags.)
 
@Doorknob oooh!
Yum!
@MonicaCellio I wish there was an edit that didn't show on the frontpage for these kinds of things.
 
@AnnonomusPenguin it's been discussed on MSE, but the consensus is that all edits should bump because we need that check from the community. Things you do at the tag level directly won't bump -- merges and synonyms. I don't remember if you can outright rename a tag that way.
Err, maybe -- Andy renamed new-user to new-users and I don't see bumps from that.
 
1:52 AM
@MonicaCellio You can rename a tag with merge
 
@AnnonomusPenguin oh right; now that you mention it, I've done that.
 
@AnnonomusPenguin whispers That's the only way I knew how to do it.
 
@Andy vs. manually
Wait... do you know merge vs synonyms yet?
 
Oh. Yes. I did know synonyms
 
Do you know the difference?
 
1:57 AM
Yes
 
Good. :)
 
 
11 hours later…
1:17 PM
wow... 999
 
2:13 PM
@AJHenderson ooh. Quick, propose an edit! :-)
 
but then my 999 would go away
1001 is so much less awesome
though I suppose I could propose an edit and find a bad answer to downvote
 
@AJHenderson I predict that you'd end up at 1000, same as if you rep-capped. But I don't know, so... for science!
 
@MonicaCellio ok... for science
 
@AJHenderson ok, I did my part. Need one more approver.
 
2:29 PM
@MonicaCellio ah, I missed the fact that you passed me back
grats on 1000
 
@AJHenderson I was cleaning up tags and wikis, and the +2s added up.
@AJHenderson thanks. I had assumed you would beat me there. But it's just a few points between us.
 
@MonicaCellio yeah, I tend to focus on answers and there haven't been many new questions lately :/
well, I should say I focus on cleanup and review on sites where I mod, then sites where I'm 20k (or 4k betas) then I focus on answering any new questions on any of the sites, then I focus on clean up on sub20/4k non-mod sites
it's just my internal prioritization for making the biggest impact, reasoning being if I don't have max privs, getting max privs makes my time spent on cleanup more productive
oh noes....1001
I brokesded the SE
 
mm... why questions have so high average score? VOTE ON ANSWERS PEOPLE!!!
 
@AJHenderson me too (to both parts).
@AJHenderson interesting. You get partial rep for questions/answers if you hit the rep cap, but you get that last +1 for an edit that puts you over. Granted that it's a really minor corner case, but I had a different mental model of how the code works.
But hey, 1001 is a cool number too. :-)
 
it's actually about what I expected
because the 1000 isn't a daily cap, it's a grant condition
daily rep is probably at the end of a summation of certain reputation grants
 
2:44 PM
@AJHenderson I was under the impressing that the rep cap only applied to upvotes
 
@Braiam yes, but it is questions and answers
so they have to wrap the total from both in a limit
 
@AJHenderson exactly, the rep cap only applies to the reputation gained from upvotes
 
where as deciding if you grant a credit for suggested edit approval could just be a direct if statement
I was more talking about code structure that makes the most sense
given the behavior
 
2:57 PM
@Braiam oh, I thought edits were included too. If edits aren't rep-capped then this makes more sense. (The rep cap has to be checked for at each rep increase, because you stop getting the rep when you hit the cap rather than getting it and having it revoked by a nightly batch job.)
@AJHenderson yup. While I was assuming that if there's code involved that's already checking for daily cap, it would also check for this boundary. I'm imagining a "do we grant the rep?" (or, more precisely, "how much of this rep do we grant?") function that's called on each increase.
 
@MonicaCellio according to Jon Skeet only upvotes are counted to the rep cap... but hey, when was last time Jon suggested an edit :S
 
@Braiam when was the last time Jon Skeet could get rep for suggesting an edit? :-)
(Actually, we got a couple questions from him on Mi Yodeya. So, on non-programming sites, it could happen.)
2
 
I've not gotten any rep from an edit when I was rep-capped
I've also gotten +1 when I had 199 rep from upvotes, an accept, and other edits
 
accepts and bounties doesn't count towards the cap
 
hmm, then it was something else to give me an odd number of rep
let me dig through my user page to find it
 
3:59 PM
looks like I was crazy and mis-remembering. I hit rep cap from upvotes, resulting in no rep from an edit
 
4:30 PM
Congratulations New Moderators
 
Thanks @Malachi
 
it's awesome to see that we have Moderators, that kind of makes me think the site will survive for a little while longer!!!! we need more questions though!
 
Agreed. We need to lure people here.
Hmm..."lure" sounds like I mean knock them over the head and drag them this way. Not my intention
 
I will see what I can do on a couple of the games that I play, the Moderators on them seem to know me by name .... lol
 
user35386
 
@Andy no, "luring" involves bait, not clubbing over the head. :-)
@Articuno that's one cranky user.
 
@MonicaCellio I'm ok with luring then.
 
@Andy me too. Besides, we want them to be conscious, not loopy from the concussion, and interested rather than resentful once they're here. :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
6:11 PM
Moderator Election in Workplace. low participation?
 
@Malachi seven candidates for one slot, but a day into the voting only three have responded to the questionnaire so far. (I don't know about other people, but when I stood for election last time around I had drafts of half my answers in advance, because you could tell from the question-collection post which ones were definitely going to make the cut.)
 
6:31 PM
this is what I am talking about
no votes in the primary?
or are they all even amounts of ups and downs?
 
@Malachi you don't have a primary if there are less than 10 candidates
it skipped the whole primary process for us
because there are only 7
 
that makes sense
 
@Malachi yeah, no primary so no opportunity for votes there.
 
I see one person that has all the fancy badges.... :)
one person that is very new to the site
 
@Malachi :D
 
6:37 PM
@MattGiltaji make that 2
I was talking about Mike Van
almost has as much Rep as you do but in less amount of time @MattGiltaji
 
@Malachi that's fine, as I said in my nomination post, I am not as interested in rep grinding
 
I hear that, I have tried to jump in a couple of elections where I knew they weren't going to vote for me... lol
Back to Work for a bit.
I still can't vote for you if I wanted to @MattGiltaji but my votes would probably go to Enderland first and then you second....
be hard between you and wesley I guess... I like his attitude
 
@Malachi that's ok, so did mine :D
besides, you still have a week to get the 4 more rep you need to vote
edit a tag wiki and tag wiki except and you're there
*excerpt
 
7:16 PM
@MattGiltaji I edited some posts a little bit ago as well...lol
 
 
2 hours later…
9:07 PM
I should really read the transcript... but I'm way too lazy today :P
Hola everyone! Anything new?
@AJHenderson you could always downvote someone... evil plan! I guess you'll have to settle for 1001.
@Malachi Thanks....
 
@AnnonomusPenguin I suggested that too
but I just couldn't bring myself to make someone else suffer for my perfectionism
 
@AJHenderson Make the highest rep user suffer! Whatever....
 
@AnnonomusPenguin I'm sure andy thanks you for the support ;)
I suppose he doesn't need it anymore
 
Yeah, but rep is still ego points.
I was more saying find some spam, flag it, and downvote it, but.... it'd be so much easier to pick a random person.
 
@AnnonomusPenguin diamonds are more ego points though
forget rose colored glasses, blue colored glasses are far cooler
 
9:16 PM
Meh.... it is still good to get a "thanks"
 
yeah, that was what I was thinking of doing too, but it really wasn't worth the effort
 
@AJHenderson well, yes.... and not only because blue is a cool color and rose is a warm color!
yesterday, by AJ Henderson
never under-estimate the laziness of people on the internet
Fine quote
 
@AnnonomusPenguin yeah, I suppose the I should have been capitalized in Internet, but I was too lazy to fix it ;)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:42 PM
@AnnonomusPenguin Awww...that's mean. :(
 
11:27 PM
Evening, folks.
 
11:46 PM
@FEichinger Hiya!
@Andy Hey, I've given you plenty of upvotes :P
 
Also, @AJHenderson ... Putting you at the cruel "too close and still not there" 999 was my work.
I saw the opportunity. And I took it.
 
Now someone else upvoted @AJHenderson
 
Wasn't me, I promise!
 
Oh, hey @Seth! o/
 
'yo @FEichinger
 
11:57 PM
oy @Seth
o/
What's new with you? Did you fix your Zune yet?
 

« first day (13 days earlier)      last day (3280 days later) »