@TheLittleNaruto Hi little Naruto. It is ones perspective. We should not take it as disrespect but just different taste. I just checked that comment and haven't gone through the transcript.
On Internet, I came across this text today(highlighted portion).
In case the picture is not loading, here is the text which is written in the image
The Vedas declare that God is fully present in His Name itself. He has
put all His powers in His Name. So, He is present in the same form in
His Na...
I a confused because Shiv puran say Shiva is the supreme God. Bhagavata gita say Krishna is supreme God. Vedas say Indra is supreme God. Upanishad say the God is one without second. But on the other hand you have purna which have some conversation between God's like SHIVA VISHNU AND BRAHAM.
@TheLittleNaruto I would have gotten offended by it if it was response to me or addressing me. This is someone's private discussion. There are many chatrooms where such ill things are discussed about Indians or religion. Did I get anything still wrong here?
@Mr_Green Well we need to, at least to those who want to run as a candidate in coming election. Otherwise how we will be sure that the person is a deserving one.
without knowing basics of technical words, how one is going to moderate?
@TheLittleNaruto I don't think handling meta requires technical understanding. All are welcome here and that applies to become mod too (no need to be a scholar). I participated in mod just to keep weight.
@TheLittleNaruto please do. I apologise if my understanding came as shock to you. I just feel this is right being so much active from last 8 years on SE's different networks and their chatrooms.
Generally, we just can't get offend by everyone's opinion. This is what is intolerance, a defensive mechanism which we should avoid here.
@TheLittleNaruto I don't know this word or gunas. But I did sense tamasic as bad from that chat transcript's discussion. And my discussion is not about it but to ignore it.
@TheLittleNaruto guys, I don't think we need to blow this out of proportion. The discussion with Ikshvaku was civil... he just expressed his personal views about Shiva. While I personally don't agree with him, there are staunch Vaishnavas who feel that way about Shiva. This is not a new thing. It has been going on for centuries. Some people classify Shaiva Puranas as Tamasic, and Vaishnava Puranas as Sattvik.
@TheLittleNaruto the sectarian rivalries sometimes lose themselves in these fights, and forget to recognize the Vedic message.
This kind of question: hinduism.stackexchange.com/q/7456/20829 is the problem with some Hindus today. They take the Purana stories too seriously, as literal fact, or consider them from a realistic human point of view.
These stories are symbolic and are meant to teach deeper lessons than the actual details of the events themselves.
Again, I know there are many here who wouldn't agree with me, but what I take from the story of churning the milk ocean is that we need to share responsibilities and work collectively towards a common goal. Everyone should do their part. That's all. If we start asking, why Vishnu didn't drink the poison, etc. then we are losing the big picture for insignificant details.
On Internet, I came across this text today(highlighted portion).
In case the picture is not loading, here is the text which is written in the image
The Vedas declare that God is fully present in His Name itself. He has
put all His powers in His Name. So, He is present in the same form in
His Na...
I a confused because Shiv puran say Shiva is the supreme God. Bhagavata gita say Krishna is supreme God. Vedas say Indra is supreme God. Upanishad say the God is one without second. But on the other hand you have purna which have some conversation between God's like SHIVA VISHNU AND BRAHAM.
Hinduism
Hinduism