« first day (1636 days earlier)      last day (1955 days later) » 

12:09 AM
@KrishnaShweta I was waiting whether someone would ask me this but you're intelligent :D.. Pranan is different from Prana. Prana is vital air out of primary 10 vayus but Pranan is ultimate shakti of supreme which is there at top of head for us.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:48 AM
When will users know that title is not the question?!
Vague and one liners without improvement are reopened blindly.
 
2:38 AM
@NogShine hi man
 
@AkshayS hello
 
3:25 AM
0
Q: Who is Sridhara Swami Advaitin or Vaishnav?

krrSridhara Swami is generally referred as an Advaita commentator but this site https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-1-1/ says Sridhara Swami of Rudra sampradaya. Which is true?

 
4:06 AM
@AkshayS Questions which have nothing in the body are not questions and closed as unclear. That is the way.
 
4:16 AM
@NogShine Yes... that's why I added the comment to be specific in the body on what basis does the author wants the answer. And to me, question is not unclear and the author perhaps would have missed to add content in body. Are women not allowed to read vedas or is there restrictions on women is the question. Its not unclear and if author can add and be specific in content, it will give perfect picture to answer. This question is not unclear and at the same time its unclear to answer
 
Do not reopen/leave open questions which have nothing in the body and only title.
@AkshayS Personally, every question is good and everything will be clear. But close voting doesn't have personal opinions. If different people have different views, it is obviously unclear and a bad question. But people are voting to reopen many such questions.
 
@NogShine I didnt click leave open option but instead I skipped because that question can be changed and we must give 1 chance for author to rephrase it
@NogShine This is not personal view because title makes it clear what OP expects but if they can add further content in body, it can be answered. I give suggestions only for which it can be improved.
 
A question can be always reopened if it is clear enough. It is only putting on hold not deleting. But every time 1 chance to the OP and users reviewing will give wrong reviews every time. There won't be no closing of such questions.
@AkshayS Title is only introduction. It is not question. Question is the body.
Nothing is present there.
titles should be short and simple. Body should be detailed.
 
@NogShine That's correct but if we look at from author's perpsective, he could have added the question in title itself. That's why suggestion I felt is needed!
@NogShine how long questions will be on hold?
 
@AkshayS So, we should not close one liners? In that case, we should not delete one liners too?
Adding question in the title is not the right way..
Moderation should go on..
allowing such question will become a practice and users think that is the good way to write questions.
 
4:27 AM
@NogShine I am not saying we should not close all one liners because not all post have same quality or clarity in title itself. Depends on questions. but if we look at certain questions, we can definitely realize certain questions can be given a chance
 
@AkshayS Titles need to be clear. They are just introductions. It is the body which matters.
 
I am always cool in discussions because difference of opinion is always Maya :P
 
293
Q: How do I write a good title?

Mark HarrisonA good title helps your question get the attention it deserves. What goes into a good title? Return to FAQ index

15
Q: 'Playing football takes us nearer to heaven rather than reading Bhagavad Gita' but how and why?

Arnav DasThat famous line above was uttered by none other than Swami Vivekananda. I admit that I haven't gone through the complete speech yet, but I am curious to know what he meant by that. Did he mean that being a karmayogi in the path of salvation is more suited to today than any other path or did he ...

No one says this question is unclear based on title.
 
@NogShine Ohooo... then come lets play and go to Moksha :P
 
Read that faq post.
 
4:33 AM
@NogShine The question is clear... what is unclear?
 
@AkshayS The title is not saying what the question is. Is it?
It is clear because the body is detailed.
Same applies to all questions.
 
@NogShine We cant fix a standardized rule because application of each question is different...
Even if we have that rule, we should be able to see whether this question can be given a chance or not
 
@AkshayS Fixing rules is what discussions and Meta is for. There are guidelines to follow which post to close or delete. There are clear rules to follow. It is people who have different opinions. Different opinions and misunderstanding is not the same as not having standard rules.
@AkshayS Moderation and improvement both should go on. One should not stop for the other.
 
@NogShine Let me not get trapped in Maya. Lets finish this discussion :P
 
@AkshayS Why do you always say Maya? Are you fond of it?
Discussions do not end here. Just a pause and break
;)
 
4:45 AM
@NogShine haha.... because without Maya, everyone of us are same.
 
So, what is going on?
 
5:19 AM
@NogShine Reading SAGAKALVI of Vallalar
 
There was one question about Vallalar but unclear and opinion based one.
Another is open and unanswered
1
Q: What is the yoga of Sri VallalAr?

Rakesh JoshiHe was (is?) a well known divine figure of the south Indian shaiva siddha tradition. His name was Sri RAmalinga swamigal and lived in tamil nadu. It is believed that he DEMATERIALIZED his physical body and transformed it to a light body. Thus attained immortality. His place vaDalur is a pilgri...

 
5:36 AM
@NogShine He never did any Yoga to be honest. He lived a life with his mother and wife, and when his wife passed away, he came to chidambaram.... His path was GYAN YOGA and in that he always told us to be 24hrs in vichara. Through Vichara reach immortality
He visited and did as per procedure deity worship to Lord Shiva and Parvati, got their darshan and his guru was Muruga...
 
5:48 AM
@AkshayS I think you can write an answer with some reference.
Just post for the site or leave it. No problem but don't say based on user.
1 message moved to Trash
1 message moved to Trash
 
@NogShine Ask one of mods to kindly remove it..
 
@AkshayS I moved away. No problem now.
 
6:06 AM
@NogShine haha.... now time to leave.... will see you soon !
 
@AkshayS Sure. Take care
 
6:44 AM
0
Q: Permenant hell in Hinduism

hanugmFrom the answers of this question, we came to know that Hinduism does not have any permanent hell. But from the following excerpt from Vana Parva of Mahabharata, the permanent hell exists The Yaksha asked,--'O bull of the Bharata race, who is he that is condemned to everlasting hell? It be...

 
7:22 AM
if you deeply spiritual you need to give reference to all the scriptures.. so I have no word to convey anything, now I order substantia above I need to give reference to satprashnoupanishad in turn will lead kath Upanishad in turn lead purana in turn lead veda… it will never end.. — prasanna ragothaman 22 mins ago
^.^
@AkshayS oh :-)
 
@KrishnaShweta I knew about this users mindset and avoided to talk to him or advise him
 
Happened before also?
 
@KrishnaShweta SS haha... he is like that... I am waiting for one rude comment from him to flag
 
Oh where? Link please
 
@KrishnaShweta Check his answers from his profile. 4 answers.
@TheDestroyer For VAYU BOOTHA = Mahesvara is the deity. Mahesvara is deity and is different from supreme Isvara.... Iswara is not deity for vayu bootha. In a way my suggestion was correct! hinduism.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/23507
 
7:31 AM
@AkshayS Ok..
 
@KrishnaShweta I appreciated your intellegence. u forgot to read that :P
 
I read that
I replied
Hello @Nog
 
@NogShine Its time to search users rude behavior :P
 
@AkshayS Huh? Are you reading my mind? Will do it tonight when you are asleep. ;)
@KrishnaShweta Hello
 
@NogShine When you are in yoga sadhana you can do these miracles :P
 
7:35 AM
@NogShine you have used other Trash. Maybe I understood why you did.
 
@KrishnaShweta :-)
@AkshayS Guess what I will do with it?
 
@NogShine when time comes I will say :P
 
@Nog you didn't welcome one new user in comments :-(
 
@KrishnaShweta flag this post?
 
Aug 8 at 17:25, by Bhargav Rao
> Dear Precious Snowflake, I apologize for my inability to help you. It is not your fault. It is mine. Entirely mine. I'm really sorry to bother you with anything short of an immediate answer, but perhaps please could you give me a few seconds to research this for you.
@KrishnaShweta Like this ? ^
Aug 8 at 17:29, by Nog Shine
> Hello Sir/Madam, Welcome to Hinduism Stack Exchange. We are blessed on this special day to have you as a user. Pleased to see you here. Your question looks wonderful but I am extremely sorry to say that you shown minimum effort. Did you happen to search first on a search engine? If not, I am sorry. We will still help you. Sorry again :( :( :(
Or this ?
 
7:41 AM
Haha
@AkshayS hmm yes I think.
 
@NogShine Night is meant to sleep :P
 
@KrishnaShweta One liners are received well. That is my problem. :(
@AkshayS Lions hunt at night ;-P
 
@NogShine So me too joining :D but not at the cost of sleep :P
 
Back to my previous chat status. 😎
 
@NogShine https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/23507
For VAYU BOOTHA = Mahesvara is the deity. Mahesvara is deity and is different from supreme Isvara.... Iswara is not deity for vayu bootha. In a way my suggestion was correct!
 
7:48 AM
@Zanna You brought friends with you?
Welcome @Kulfy !
 
@NogShine hahaha
 
@AkshayS Yes. But the author was writing different. Let the author know it. It will be approved.
 
@NogShine seems so ^_^
 
@NogShine if the user is girl then please leave them for first time. You know we have hardly two or three :-(
 
@KrishnaShweta hahaha.
(I'm talking about reopen queue.)
 
7:51 AM
@NogShine everyone is female here. Only Param Purusha is male, the ultimate Parabrahman
 
@AkshayS Yes. Exactly.
> "1.My daughter, the one who has a shining face, is now even unable to stand
at one place and has been restless. Her heart has been melting and her
eyes and cheeks are full of tears and has been singing of Him. She has
been searching for Him desperately at all places and has been calling
"NarasimhA! NarasimhA!" She has been weltering that Lord NarasimhA
immediately arrived for PrahlAdA while He never comes for her at all.""
 
No need for any effort at improving gender representation then ;)
 
Nammalwar sings above thinking himself as a women yearning for the love of the Lord ^ ^
 
@NogShine Nice!!
 
@NogShine That's why Amman has another name SIVA KAMA SUNDHARI...in nataraj temple. Here KAMA for Purusha, Isvara....
Welcome @TheDestroyer - Rudra :D
 
7:54 AM
> aadiyaadi* akamkaraindhu,* isai
paadippaadik* kaNNeermalki,* engum
naadi_naadi* narasingaa enRu,*
vaadivaadum* ivvaaNuthalE. 2.4.1
Tamil for @Zanna and @AkshayS ^
 
@AkshayS Let that corrected in answer or through comments. It would be better if we don't edit such technical aspects.
 
Hello @TheDestroyer I have someone's comment for you. ^^
 
@AkshayS Thanks Rudra..
@KrishnaShweta which comment?
 
@TheDestroyer why? Shouldnt we be correct in mentioning Panchabootha deities?
 
@NogShine ^_^
 
7:55 AM
@KrishnaShweta It's not about merely external cleanliness like taking a bath, but internal and spiritual purity also, which Chandalas don't have due to their birth. — Ikshvaku 11 hours ago
@TheDestroyer ^^
 
@AkshayS Vayu element is actually mentioned differently in different places. Technical aspects need not be edited in questions.
@KrishnaShweta what's point of showing it to me?
 
@TheDestroyer Here vayu is related to internal deity of 6 chakras. Muladhara being AUM Kara, then next 5 = panchaboothas, and 7th is Turiya.
 
@TheDestroyer nothing. I forgot sorry.
 
@AkshayS Actually, it conflicts author's words. Let such things be corrected through answer or through comments. We can only edit grammar or such things.
 
@TheDestroyer ohoo....
 
8:49 AM
Found something about hats :D
 
looks like 2016
 
Yes
 
 
2 hours later…
10:48 AM
@AkshayS hi
 
@Akash.B hi
 
@AkshayS do you believe in spirits?
 
@Akash.B I dont believe
 
@AkshayS any reason for that?
 
@Akash.B because they are reality :D
I'll tell you one thing. This belief is duality concept. If you believe in God and if someone gives another reason and says God doesnt exist, your mind will swing to that idea. So let us come out of belief concepts
 
10:58 AM
@AkshayS yeah
 
@Akash.B Try to connect with supreme and invite him to run your life. I assure your wants and needs will be even more satisfied without Karma if you have devotion to God
:47998919 Yes I know
 
@AkshayS do you know what he says?
:47998946 okay
 
@Akash.B be sincere in whatever practices you do for spirituality!.... Even 1 small step, Paramatma will be noting it!
 
@AkshayS i will
 
@Akash.B Paramatma sees only this thing. Your trust on him, devotion.
 
11:05 AM
@AkshayS yeah,devotion
 
@Akash.B Devotion will automatically increase when you experience him in your day to day activities of life.
 
@AkshayS but..
 
@Akash.B S tell
 
@AkshayS I am not able to experience him
 
@Akash.B It will take time. No hurries. If he starts to come in your life, gradually unexpected joyful events will happen in your life.
 
11:11 AM
@AkshayS will i have to wait?
 
@Akash.B Yes. dont be hurry. Lot of time is left.
 
@AkshayS okay
need to log off
got some work
 
 
1 hour later…
12:35 PM
0
Q: Expalaing the meaning of Atharva veda 4:32:2

Ranjeet BahadurThis is what i found on an Hindu critique blog vedkabhed on wordpress. Boneless, pure, cleansed with the wind, brilliant, they go to a brilliant world. The fire does not burn their male organ. In Swarga they get plenty of women.” [Atharvaved 4:34:2] Is it actual description of distorted one.

 
 
2 hours later…
2:26 PM
@Pandya
 
@AkshayS Yes.
Namaskar!
 
@Pandya Check this user. He is not all following regulations to answer. He is simply answering and when questioned he is trying to justify. hinduism.stackexchange.com/users/16912/prasanna-ragothaman
He is not at all writing answers properly
 
Teach him/her by commenting and linking help center pages.
 
@Pandya He is not ready to follow. Look at @KrishnaShweta comments to guide the new user. He is not following
 
2:55 PM
@AkshayS ok. one answer (that was not answering the question) is deleted. Couple of answers annotated woth post notice, I've just commented on his couple of answers telling how to answer and cite source.
@Zanna Hi, so, are you here to learn some concepts of Hinduism?
 
@Pandya Hmm... great. !
@Pandya Pandya as we resume meditation, only when our Prana surpass the space between eyebrows and reaches Brahmandhra, we will have our spiritual experience
 
@AkshayS Are you expert in Tantra or Yoga?
 
@Pandya why ji? No experts in Yoga why?
 
3:11 PM
@AkshayS oh! Means you are expert in Yoga as well as in Tantra.
 
@Pandya No experts ji...
 
3:47 PM
@Pandya yes :)
@Pandya :) thanks! I feel welcomed by you pointing me towards that question
 
4:11 PM
0
Q: If there is a contradiction between Pratyaksha Pramana and Sabda Pramana, which one is more authoritative according to Advaita and Dvaita Vedanta?

Naveen KickAccording to this answer if there is a contradiction between Pratyaksha and Sruti(Like scriptures say fire is cold but we perceive fire is hot), only Pratyaksha is more authoritative according to Vishitadvaita Vedanta. I would like to know the same for Dvaita and Advaita Vedanta respectively.

 
4:35 PM
Ok. @Pandya will carry this yogic discussion tmrw. Time for bed.. now...
 
4:50 PM
@Pandya Answer is ME!! :D
 
@AkshayS Sure!
@NogShine for Zanna?
 
Yes.
@Pandya btw, what's your (mod) view on one line questions where there's nothing in the body?
There are many questions posted like these and upvoted. Commenting, closing is not working.
 
@Pandya it's true, this @NogShine encourages me to participate and explore
 
3
Q: On which side of the body should we lay while sleeping and why?

MacindowsIs there any preferable side according to Hinduism?

Example is this. Vague question with vague tags.
"Is there any preferable side according to body". That's it
Reopened without any improvement.
 
5:10 PM
@Zanna great!
@Zanna excellent!
@NogShine Yes, sometimes I observed they put whole two lines in title of question whereas body contains only half of line.
 
@Pandya Nothing but that. They used to be closed in the past. Now users changed and reopening without looking at improvement.
 
I guess @Pandya is writing answer. ^^
 
If that is athava Veda answer, the blog used AWGP ranslation only.
 
@NogShine well, here agian community is divided whether to allow everything written in text or not. I'll probably write one meta when I will analyse and have a conclusion.
@KrishnaShweta which one?
 
@Pandya What written in text? Did we ever have one unanimous discussion since last faq?
What's there to analyze? There are questions on MSE already and we followed the way in the past. What's the problem in doig the same now?
 
5:26 PM
@NogShine have discussed earlier. You pointed that not everything written in text would be on-topic e.g. non-religious things.
 
@Pandya I'm asking about questions which have nothing in the body but everything in title. Not about scope.
They were closed as "Unclear what you are asking in the past"
now freely upvod and reopened.
@Pandya Yes, I still stick to that. Destroyer also agrees.
 
@NogShine didn you talk about re-opening without improvement?
 
@Pandya Yes. The question was still oneliner and no improvvement into a detailed one. Still it was reopened.
 
@NogShine Revision shows it was closed as off-topic not as unclear.
 
@Pandya Yes, but we don't reopen and close again as unclear. Do we?
No user can do it because they can only vote to close once. While reopening, many things should be considered.
 
5:33 PM
@NogShine unambiguous since last faq?
 
Ultimately, it doesn't matter if it's unclear or off-topic but reopening because of wrong close reason doesn't happen anywhere on SE.
@Pandya Yes. Show me a meta post where there was unanimous decision.
Every time there's some useful meta, the answer comes as Community is divided. In those cases, one who says SE way and useful way in long term should be selected.
 
What would be the solution steps according to you?
 
Following network wide policies for general topics like comments etc.,
There is so much noise in comments.
Debates, discussions are going on. Sometimes, unfriendly comments and chatty comments
 
6:01 PM
on AU we reopen questions to close them as duplicates if they are good quality
 
6:16 PM
[Just for fun] Btw, I am just trying one poll. since the poll runs without signup and results are also visible it's expected to vote single time sincerely. Here is a link: linkto.run/p/PZ9PHU0P [only for SE users].
Here is direct result link linkto.run/r/PZ9PHU0P ; clicking on "show numbers" button you can see no. of votes on each option.
 
neat :)
 
Good Night!
 
good night :)
 

« first day (1636 days earlier)      last day (1955 days later) »