« first day (114 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) » 

3:45 AM
@Mr_Green Nothing much. Did you see my second trivia question?
 
4:02 AM
@KeshavSrinivasan nope
where is it?
ahh wait got it.
"Another Hinduism trivia question if anyone's interested: what do Vishnu, Shiva, and the Pandavas all have in common?"
@KeshavSrinivasan they were not naturally born
right?
 
4:28 AM
@Mr_Green No, that's not the answer I'm looking for. And in any case the Pandavas were naturally born, they just were the sons of gods. Other than that their births were normal. Shiva came out of Brahma's forehead, and Vishnu was never born at all; see here: hinduism.stackexchange.com/a/259/36. So that's not really something they have in common.
 
hmm
@KeshavSrinivasan they all were in exile in different events?
 
@KeshavSrinivasan @Mr_Green hey guys wassup?
long time eh
 
@AwalGarg hey
what are you doing these days in javascript chat room?
are you regular there?
 
learning javascript ofcourse ;p
 
hehe kk
 
4:33 AM
@Mr_Green That's a rather tenuous connection. Vishnu may have been in exile in one of his incarnations, but not really he himself. And I don't think Siva was ever in exile.
@AwalGarg Hi
 
thinking.... seems very tough :|
 
what is the question? maybe I know the answer
 
What do Vishnu, Shiva, and the Pandavas all have in common?
This is the second Hinduism trivia question I've posted in chat.
 
2 days ago, by Keshav Srinivasan
Another Hinduism trivia question if anyone's interested: what do Vishnu, Shiva, and the Pandavas all have in common?
 
They are all kind hearted.
 
4:36 AM
@AwalGarg Haha, you could say that about billions of people. I'm looking for something more specific.
 
They did some kind of unique pooja or yagna?
 
@KeshavSrinivasan iirc, yudhishthira was incarnation of dharmraaj, arjun was son of indra, and such things... right?
@KeshavSrinivasan atleast give us some hint ;p
What was there about Bheem, Nakul and sahadeva?
 
@Mr_Green No, that's not it. First of all poojas as we understand them today are a modern invention. Second of all the only major yagna Yudisthira did was a Rajasuya yagna, and I don't think Vishnu or Shiva ever did that yagna. The only god I know of who's done a Rajasuya Yagna was Chandra the moon god, to conquer the heavenly bodies.
 
it has something to do with durvasa rishi, right?
 
@AwalGarg Yudishthira is the son of Yama god of death, Arjuna is the son of Indra, Bhima is the son of Vayu the wind god, and Nakula and Sahadeva are the sons of the two Ashwini Kumaras. But that has nothing to do with the answer.
 
4:42 AM
 
@AwalGarg No, it has nothing to do with Durvasa, although Durvasa is known for his interactions with a lot of famous people.
OK, here's a hint: the answer can be found in one of my questions on Hinduism.SE.
 
kk, lemme try now
I got it, the divine sword of Asi, @KeshavSrinivasan right?
 
@AwalGarg Congratulations, you got it right!
 
\o/ \o/ fireworks \o/ \o/
 
They were all owners of the divine sword Asi at various times.
 
4:45 AM
so now, where is my reward? @KeshavSrinivasan
;p
 
ahh I just saw that :(
 
@AwalGarg Your reward is the satisfaction of being right :D
 
xD
karma karo, phal ki ichha mat karo
 
I am damn sure that was with great damage
 
@AwalGarg Hindi nahi malum.
Here's the relevant question, for the benefit of others: hinduism.stackexchange.com/q/3236/36
 
4:47 AM
btw, @KeshavSrinivasan has 62 questions and only 19 answers :D He himself on the other hand has posted over 100 answers xD
@KeshavSrinivasan It is the famous statement of Krishna saying, "Do your work, without thinking about the result"
 
@AwalGarg Yeah, unfortunately few people take the effort of reading my questions, let alone answering them.
@AwalGarg That's why I put this statement in my profile page: "My questions tend to be fairly obscure. I put a lot of effort into them, so I'd appreciate it if you at least try to read them. If you don't understand one of my questions, or you don't feel like reading it and you want me to summarize it for you, feel free to leave a comment or ping me in chat."
 
I read them, if I see them. Like I read the Asi sword question. But you already know so much that there is not much other people will know more.
 
@KeshavSrinivasan yeah just read it.. very nice and you showed great research effort as always :)
 
I wholeheartedly agree. People should look at my questions and try to emulate those: hinduism.stackexchange.com/users/36/… The sort of questions I ask should be the default type of question asked on the site. A good question should be detailed and well-researched, just like a good answer should be. — Keshav Srinivasan Sep 28 at 16:13
^this too, I agree
 
@AwalGarg Yeah, I expect the majority of my questions will only be answered when this site gets more knowledgeable users, and users who are willing to search through scriptures to find answers. But I wish more people would at least take the effort to just read my questions, rather than giving up because of their length.
@Mr_Green Thanks
 
4:53 AM
hehe
 
@KeshavSrinivasan hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/3329/… can you answer this question? I would vote to reopen if you think it can be answered.
 
@AwalGarg Yeah, I can try to see whether it's mentioned in Hindu scripture.
 
@KeshavSrinivasan you already did answer one.
 
ok then I would improve and vote to reopen
 
but you didn't mention what are the effects/beliefs though.. which I thought that it is the nuisance of rahu and ketu
 
4:57 AM
@Mr_Green That's not about pregnancy though.
 
Yeah but it comes under the same question
I think so
 
@Mr_Green Well, when I was answering your question I assumed you were asking what the nature of eclipses was, since you said in your question "I have heard that they are the result of trouble making by Rahu and Ketu by devouring the sun/moon for a while."
 
yeah I think I was asking both :)
 
I have improved that question, consider it better now @KeshavSrinivasan @Mr_Green?
4
Q: Why is Chandra Grahan (Lunar eclipse) considered unsafe for pregnant women in Hinduism?

Srinath NaiduIt is said that women should not work during Lunar Eclipse or Chandra Grahan. It is said that doing so effects the physical health of the baby. Is there any mention of this in the scriptures, or any specific reason behind this ritual?

 
@Mr_Green oh ok
 
4:59 AM
0
Q: Were Hindu scriptures tampered by Britishers?

Mr_GreenI am not sure whether this is true or not but I often heard from many users from online that our scriptures were tampered by Britishers when they invaded us. There motto of tampering our scriptures was to Divide and Conquer a Secular Country. (and many other reasons) Whenever I google, I can ...

 
@VedaVani off topic
 
:/
I will ask on History.SE after few responses
 
@Mr_Green yes that's it. I am not voting to close right now. Because I myself want answers to that question from people of this site xD
 
@Mr_Green What do you mean many users? The only user I've heard advancing this theory is the user Hindu.
 
hehe and also logical Hindu
and some "alpha" guy
not logical hindu
 
5:02 AM
> what is the proof that they did so?
dude................
 
what should I ask then?
 
should I edit?
 
@Mr_Green Personally I think such claims are ridiculous. We have such good records of our scriptures, so it's hard to believe that they've been tampered with.
 
(if you don't mind)
 
@AwalGarg sure
@KeshavSrinivasan but I can see many people discussing about the same in many forums on web
 
5:05 AM
@Mr_Green I think people just try to advance theories that they've been tampered with or distorted, because they find some things in our scriptures too embarrassing or politically incorrect, like animal sacrifice and the caste system.
 
I am researching on this.. till then I can't say
 
I don't think we should try to disown parts of our scriptures just because it offends the sensibilities of modern society. That's why I'm a strong supporter of the caste system, for instance.
 
hehe
no offence to anyone.. just want to know the truth.. I am neutral :)
 
@Mr_Green edited, better?
 
yup good
 
5:10 AM
;-)
hmm well I have to go now
cya guys later :)
 
@AwalGarg Bye
 
me too
bye
 
@Mr_Green Bye
 
5:36 AM
If anyone's interested, here's Hinduism trivia question number 3: who was the mother-in-law of Ravana's brother Kumbhakarna?
 
 
8 hours later…
2:01 PM
0
Q: Is there any hidden meaning behind this verse

RajI have been chanting hanuman chalisa since childhood, but what makes me wonder is that, why there is the verse - "buddhi heen tanu janike sumirahu pawankumar , bal buddhi vidhya deu mohi harhu kalesh vikar" Isn't that offensive for lord hanuman ? Any insight behind this will be highly appreciated.

 

« first day (114 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) »