Hi @FrankLuke! I just saw your answer -- nice compilation!

@MonicaCellio Thank you. My Greek lexicons don't have as much detail as the Hebrew ones. I've always been surprised by that fact.

@FrankLuke wow, that surprises me. I would have figured there'd be at least as much in the Greek lexicons.

So did I. There are more Greek in number, but most of them are not as detailed.

These are NT Greek lexicons. Those for Classical are larger and have more material to work with.

Part of the issue with Greek NT lexicons is that for centuries very little Koine was found outside the NT and LXX. And LXX Greek in some ways is a transitional form from classical to koine.

There have been very large caches of koine manuscripts (non NT) that are being analyzed and new leixcons will utilize them just like new Hebrew lexicons make use of Akkadian and Ugaritic.

@FrankLuke oh, interesting -- I had assumed that LXX was koine, and that that would be ample motivation for lots of lexicon action.

It's early koine. The earliest that is labeled koine, but there are fairly common forms in it that are used more often in classical but are almost unknown in the NT times. I think the opulative verb form is one. I don't recall what that means, and I may have the wrong one.