> Just to make sure, have you clicked the refresh button on the command bar (It should say `Pending` in your situation.) or clicked refresh in the message you get?
Should Rubberduck still not see anything after doing this, could you provide a log to us so that we can analyze the issue?
> Currently, there is no direct git integration. What Rubberduck provides is a method to export an entire project into a folder, reachable e.g. via the context menu of the code explorer, and several methods to import/sync files. There is a plain import command allowing to import multiple files. In addition there are the two sync commands, again reachable via the CE. The update command will import or overwrite from the selected files, i.e. already existing modules/classes will be replaced, but ot
Wondering about efficiency here - I have a bit of code that does what I want; but it is terribly slow. I structured the code in a way that made sense to me logically, but I'm wondering if someone else could take a look at the code and find a shortcut or two that might make it faster. I'm guessing...
Yeah, I'm going to take them up on their offer to call 'em to discuss it. "So, you insist on having your employees suffer unnecessary eye strain? This becomes an Occ Health issue, doesn't it?"
OK. I seem to have somehow managed to mangle some code at some point. I've got a missing variable. I've got vague memories of having done some reorg of where it was stored, but I don't recall where/when/what branch/commit.
How do I search git for the variable name to see where I (re)moved it?
@FreeMan git-scm.com/docs/git-log for the manpage. git log --grep="foobar" shows commits containing the regex.
git log -S "foobar": Look for differences that change the number of occurrences of the specified string (i.e. addition/deletion) in a file. Intended for the scripter’s use.
git log -G "foobar": Look for differences whose patch text contains added/removed lines that match <regex>.
@IvenBach TYVM! It may be tomorrow before I can start digging into it. That's been my life of late - open code and 37 things pop up to stop me from getting further into it.
> Hi Max, From the command bar it says Parse Error. See the screenshot. [image: Robberduck - parsing error.JPG] You ask for a log: where do I find that? What puzzles me is that at times it works, but I can't spot what I do right (or wrong!). Kind regards Alfredo
Il giorno lun 1 mar 2021 alle ore 11:25 Max Dörner <notifications@github.com> ha scritto:
> Just to make sure, have you clicked the refresh button on the command bar > (It should say Pending in your situation.) or clicked refresh in th
> Ah yes, I got the Log: Hope it is clear for you. Alfredo
Il giorno lun 1 mar 2021 alle ore 18:36 Alfredo Angrisani < alfredo.angrisani@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Max, > From the command bar it says Parse Error. See the screenshot. > [image: Robberduck - parsing error.JPG] > You ask for a log: where do I find that? > What puzzles me is that at times it works, but I can't spot what I do > right (or wrong!). > Kind regards > Alfredo > > Il giorno lun 1 mar 2021 alle ore 11:25 Max Dörner < > no
> @Alfredo732 I'm sorry, you will need to upload these through the web interface of github, because we're not going to get the attachments on email replies :/
Yeah, I hope it works out - considering the number of VB6-compiler-clone projects, that can't be a small undertaking.
I do not see whether he has a plan to make it work with VBA project - there's mentions of VBA on the page but it's not clear whether it'll be actually integrated or something akin to grafting a C++ DLL into a Office document.
Not sure - I do not understand enough, only that when you use LLVM as the backend for the compiler, it makes it much easier for you to support cross-compiling.
(since there's VBA 7, even though there's no official VB7)
I'm concerned about the backward compatibility --- if you modify a project in TB, then later some poor sap opens it in VS6 or VBA IDE, what will happen?
welp, I have no frickin' clue what this gibberish is. I think I'll go ahead and take a nap now.
all more the impressive since he never has worked for Microsoft (which probably is a big help --- had he ever, he might be obligated under NDA to never do anything like that)
Thinking about it, you have to 1) give props to MSFT for making a technology so hard that nobody can reverse engineer it even 20 years after release, but 2) smh at MSFT that there's still enough interest that they are STILL trying to reverse engineer & replace VB6/VBA.
Too early to say. For one thing, RD is and will always remain free.
If you were in a position where your company does not want to invest any more into VB6 but desperately need to do SOMETHING, then RD would be able to help.
> Just spotted this, I'm a long-time contributer to the Rubberduck extension - Wayne has contributed some of the most complex, ingenious code to the project, deep inside the internals of VB. I'm quite sure this is real, and I'm really looking forward to seeing it.
I'd probably buy twinBasic just for nostalgia and the kick of seeing VSCode compile VB6 :-)
If you really wanted to 'throw the cat amongst the pigeons' then I'd suggest Typescript as a replacement for VBA. I.e. in the Developer tab you'd get an option for Typescript as well as VBA.
I'm not thinking of Microsoft's api for running on any platform. I'm more thinking about wrapping office objects in a Typescript object so that you are directly operating on the objects (as VBA is a wrapper for COM objects), non of the 'context' jiggery pokery.
But what do I know. I'm just a slightly above average users and VBA hacker.
VBA Rubberducking
VBA Rubberducking