VBA Rubberducking

12:01 AM

RELOAD!

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 6 commits. 1 closed issue. 3 issue comments. 7761 additions. 3350 deletions.

[Minesweeper] Games Played: 146, Bombs Used: 64, Moves Performed: 19435, New Users: 14

12:13 AM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 15aa74e2 on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded

12:33 AM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit bcb3569a on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded

5 hours later…

5:12 AM

I've got a Why-this-no-working-now moment. github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/blob/next/Rubberduck.Core/… needs to be removed for me to visibly see any results in the XAML designer. If it not I get Exception: An error occurred while finding the resource dictionary "../Styles/DefaultStyle.xaml". in the designer.

2 hours later…

7:06 AM

@IvenBach Atomic commits help save yourself when you do something stupid. They let you revert just that commit while you whistle innocently and walk away hoping nobody saw what you just borked.

8:00 AM

Data grid binding to a collection object. Does the data template then bind to a property on the type of the collection? List<Foo> and Foo.Bar is what a column is bound to displaying that properties value.

^ Self question to Rested-Iven in the morning.

3 hours later…

FreeMan

11:28 AM

Productive weekend, y'all! makes his contribution by patting on the back

Hey, @IvenBach, I got your email, but haven't read yet. Sorry 'bout that. Poke me later and I'll get to it today.

2 hours later…

1:49 PM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] bclothier created comment on issue #5601: Can RD exclude a project from parse?

> Just to set expectations --

1) I expect that we will merge #5604 very soonish, usually we want to take a week or so to give contributors time to review the PR.
2) Even so, it won't be on the stable branch for a while. I hope we'll release a new stable version but that probably won't happen until next month.
3) If you really do not want to wait for either, you can actually get [the #5604 build here](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/6r5bddg65un48klf/artifacts/Rubberduck.Deployment%2FIn

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BluejacketSoftware created comment on issue #5601: Can RD exclude a project from parse?

> I'm totally fine with bleeding edge versions - MANY THANKS for sending the link. I assume this mean when I install this build I should refrain from any newer builds until #5604 gets officially incorporated.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] bclothier created comment on issue #5601: Can RD exclude a project from parse?

> Correct, if you are normally installing pre-release versions, you would need to avoid updating until #5604 is merged (which wouldn't be that much longer).

FreeMan

2:20 PM

@Duga "very soonish" -- @this is as specific as it gets!

2:43 PM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr created pull request #5607: Modify EncapsulateFieldRefactoring to generate Identifiers without underscores to merge BZngr/Rubberduck/RemoveGeneratedNameUnderscores into...

rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/next

> Closes #5425 The PR changes the EncapsulateFieldRefactoring declaration identifier modification scheme to increment identifiers without using an underscore. The EncapsulateFieldRefactoring currently appends "_1" and the increments the value as necessary to resolve conflicting property and backing field names. Introducing the underscore generated members that could not be subsequently used as an interface member (without renaming to eliminate the underscore). Equally important: The...

expected effect of changing the incrementing scheme was several failing tests. However, one test did not pass by simply removing the underscores from the expected results. The modified test surfaced a EncapsulateFieldConflictFinder bug that is also fixed in this PR.

3:09 PM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit dbebde7f on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr synchronized pull request #5605: QuickFix/RefactoringAction to infer Explicit AsTypeNames for Implicit Type declarations

3:35 PM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 26b689c7 on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr added label PR-Status: Review Requested to pull request #5605: QuickFix/RefactoringAction to infer Explicit AsTypeNames for Implicit Type declarations

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr removed label PR-Status: Conflicting from pull request #5605: QuickFix/RefactoringAction to infer Explicit AsTypeNames for Implicit Type declarations

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr added label PR-Status: Review Requested to pull request #5606: Enhance ExtractInterfaceRefactoring with implementation options

4:21 PM

Fuck you 2020. Mandatory fire evacuation. Stay safe.

My days off to a great start.

@IvenBach #ProTip: Drive away from smoke, not toward it.

Be safe!

BZngr

@IvenBach oof...Take care

5:07 PM

Oh mah lawd! The fires is a burnin! :cough: smoke all around. Urge to loot rising. Must resist.

@IvenBach if you succumb to looting, please restrict your looting to the Newsom's & co. properties.

might as well go Robin Hood

What’s that?

Newsom? Your governor?

5:30 PM

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr commented on Rubberduck.Core/Templates/Template.cs of pull request #5603: Enable user-defined templates for use in code explorer

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr commented on Rubberduck.Resources/Templates.resx of pull request #5603: Enable user-defined templates for use in code explorer

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] bclothier commented on Rubberduck.Core/Templates/Template.cs of pull request #5603: Enable user-defined templates for use in code explorer

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] bclothier commented on Rubberduck.Resources/Templates.resx of pull request #5603: Enable user-defined templates for use in code explorer

5:49 PM

Oh yeah the governor dude. Always forget what’s-his-face’s name.

he has a striking but forgettable face, eh?

Don’t think I’ve ever seen what he looks like. No TV and I avoid politics.

AIUI, he did a tv thing saying that fires are "COS CLIMATE CHANGE!!1!"

when in actual fact they had horrible forestry management

@this well, it is an exacerbating factor

6:04 PM

IMPOV, doesn't matter if climate change is a thing or not. Proper forestry management make it sustainable or a raging dumpster fire.

forestry management can not deal with the swathing changes that unmitigated climate change forces in forests.

it's just .. not a thing

forestry management is on a scale of decades...

climate change is accelerating to the point where it's too fast to be dealt with by that scale

In fact, California has mismanged their forests for decades.

so not convinced.

oh I'm not saying that the current shitshow wasn't preventable, I'm just saying that it'd have probably been a shitshow either way, just not quite such a shitty one

Fire = Bad is a long misguided mentality that has been the m.o. around public forest management for a long time.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] BZngr commented on Rubberduck.Core/Templates/Template.cs of pull request #5603: Enable user-defined templates for use in code explorer

4 hours later…

Feeds

10:22 PM

New phone OS features: Infinite customization (home screen icons no longer snap to grid), dark mode (disables screen), screaming mode (self-explanatory), and coherent ultracapacitor-pumped emission (please let us know what this setting does; we've been afraid to try it).

11:05 PM

Today I get to play in Windows Server 2003 and SQL Server 2000. IE6 is utterly utterly broken. It can go to google.com but .... that's it! any other sites of value causes IE6 to go "welp can't display it". Sooo fun!

that sounds like a total IE problem.

I offer my commiserations

BigBen

now I'm curious if bing.com will load.

not that I would call it a "site of value"