> Closes #5601 Closes #3041 Closes #1520 This PR introduces a mechanism to ignore projects from parsing and to load them via the user com projects obtained via the typeLib API instead. This loads them as built-in with the effect that they are ignored by inspections and changes to them will not be recognized until either the VBE, i.e. effectively the host, is reloaded or the projects are unignored. Moreover, the projects will not be displayed in the CE. The main infrastructure was already...
there; what was missing were the corresponding settings and a way to manage them. The new IgnoredProjectsSettings, which consist of a list of filenames to ignore, live in Rubberduck.Parsing because they are used there. They can be managed either via the settings menu, where selected files can be removed and new files added via an open file dialog, or using ignore/unignore project commands accessible via the project explorer's context menu. Using the PE has the advantage that it is...
accessible before any parse has happened. Moreover, the since CE does not display built-in projects, there is no way to unignore from there. Originally, I had planned to introduce a IgnoreUnignoreProjectsDialog modeled after the AddRemoveReferencesDialog, but I think that is something that can be done in a follow up PR,
Was there ever any discussion on converting master-->main? I ask since creating a new repo on GH the instructions default to main but locally it is still created as master. Took me a second to figure out the difference and rename my local.
> FWIW, I updated the EULA to include the suggested clauses and put it at the top with some other revisions to ensure that even with the parody, it's clear that they are agreeing to not sue no matter what.
@Duga I think it would actually make sense to explicitly ctor inject all menu items in a parent menu instead of hard-coding it in the IoC. We really do not win anything doing it the way we do right now: we cannot reuse items since they need to know their display order and there really is nothing to test for the parent menus.
If we ctor injected the items and made the DisplayOrder writable, we could just set the display order when initializing the parent menu.
> > Your sole remedy is to claim in refund or damages exactly what you paid for this product and you may claim it only from the party to whom you paid it.
That way, if someone is suckered by someone else into paying money for it (even if its for the cost of burning it to a CD for distribution - remember those days?) They're directed to whoever suckered them into it.
@Mast mostly learning to use modals in js, but at this point it's just to hold "yeah I dismissed that banner already" and "don't show this again" state (because learning to use alerts in js)... I guess the prompt would be more actively relevant on the admin site, which logs you in with your GitHub creds (also TODO... 2020)
As a Chrome user I was under the impression that what cookies are actually in use is a concern of the browser... it isn't?
Maybe I'm still in 1996 as far as cookies (or web) are concerned, but aren't they used for tons of tiny little things whenever a page needs some client-side state?
> A few years earlier, several Londoners agreed (presumably inadvertently) to give away their oldest child in exchange for Wi-Fi access. Before they could get on the Internet, users had to check a box agreeing to "assign their first born child to us for the duration of eternity." According to the Guardian, six people signed up, but the company providing the Wi-Fi said the clause likely wouldn't be enforceable in a court of law.
Interesting, stdole.OLE_COLOR (supposedly from MSForms.NewFont) is being picked up as an object type, which makes ValueRequiredInspection issue a false positive. The WTF factor is that the type doesn't seem to exist anywhere the Object Browser can see, but IntelliSense (and RD) does see it. That's hopeless without hard-coded hacks isn't it?
@this I think the US using an electoral system instead of all votes being equal was a mistake too, even though I understand why the lower-populated states want it.
I'd rather have 50 separate elections than 1 election. They are going to try and game the system no matter what the system. 50 separate systems is much harder to game than 1 system.
Besides, the electoral college means that the candidate must build a coalition instead of pandering to the LCD. We'd have much worse candidates if all they had to do is get more votes anywhere.
I have an Excel workbook (with no macros), which has a large Power Pivot data model with 103 million rows of data (around 3 GB in size). When I password protect this file on its own, it's fine.
I can partly refresh the data model and save successfully. I can bring down around 50 million rows of d...
@FreeMan I can understand that, but when I see the results of last election and the prognosea of the next one, it looks like the current game is rigged too or your average Joe is being stupid...
I'm not a fan of Biden and truly amazed by the system showing some of the worst candidates possible, but the alternative this time will keep the US as the laughing stock of the free world.
Perhaps it's simply the two-party system to blame.
Anyway, I'm not a US citizen so I don't have much beef in this game. But I think your system stinks if these candidates are the best you lot came up with.
i think there are few instances where the keys are gotten "latebound"
e.g. see classes in the Rubberduck.Core\UI\Templates folder - they do a runtime lookup
i suggest checking for all code that does runtime lookup and factoring that in your checking. If the key won't be used by those runtime lookup then you're good
I ask because a brain tickle tells me it may still be in use via XAML. Explicitly checking for a key that was not found in a search, I added it to xaml ... ToolTip="{Resx ResxName=Rubberduck.Resources.RubberduckUI, Key=SearchResults_AllImplementationsTabFormat}"... and it did come up.
in template's case, it's calculated from the file's name so there would be no way of knowing what string the lookup will provide. The only thing is that it has its own resource file so you can assume all keys in that resource file is "late-bound".
@IvenBach sorry, yes that's the right place. I added UI by mistake.
Anyone experience an issue with a string resource key not displaying in the ResX Resource Manager? It is there. 4/5 items are showing. but the first item just will no longer show...
Attempting to add the key again greys out the button.
VBA Rubberducking
VBA Rubberducking