I bet ColorScaleCriteria gets imported from Office into Excel.
Anyway, why don't we generate one declaration per library containing the class?
We really need declarations with the correct project id.
Otherwise, the resolver cannot identify them correctly.
Whether and whith which priority items in class libraries get resolved depends on the refenced libraries they are exposed on and not the ones containing the original definition.
> After experiencing this issue or something related while writing tests, I would like to add my two cents to this issue.
Whenever a library exposes a member of another library it imports, like apparently `ColorScaleCriteria` exposed in the Excel OM and not originating from Excel itself, there should nonetheless be a declaration for this class/member with the importing librarry project as project. Otherwise, the resolver cannot resolve the member properly, e.g. in cases where the interface fr
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#4851](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/2925035f5210cb7f56792554a43f6e44052acb82?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.07%`. > The diff coverage is `69.22%`.
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#4851](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/2925035f5210cb7f56792554a43f6e44052acb82?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.02%`. > The diff coverage is `70.75%`.
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#4851](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4851?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/2925035f5210cb7f56792554a43f6e44052acb82?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.02%`. > The diff coverage is `70.75%`.
@MathieuGuindon You've done something to me Mug... Now, whenever I see bad code on Excel tutorials or website the vein in my neck sticks out and starts throbbing.
As was shared a week or two ago on social media, Rubberduck contributor and supporter Andrew “ThunderFrame” Jackson passed away recently – but his love for VBA, his awesomely twisted ways of breaking it, his insights, the 464 issues (but mostly ideas, with 215 still open as of this writing) and 30 pull requests he… Continue reading Rubberduck 2.4.1: ThunderFrame Edi…
Reading the blog post, I guess the answer is that it's something we have to light up.
@BloggingDuck Love the plug for more translators! However, I should remind that we have an open issue to write an wiki article exclusively about how to translate - there were few stumbling blocks on getting started and how to do it.
I'd write it except I never have translated nor used the resource manager so.....
@this related #4338. I think atm we don't collect declarations for resource files and related documents, neither of which have code modules, but we need to.
I really need to set up a "utility" add-in for VB6 to answer those kind of questions... WTF is the VBE object so difficult to get in VB6 </rant> lemme see what I can find.
> In principle, this is possible. The limiting factor is having time to contribute the code. This would easily be its own subsystem.
You'd also have to find a good flowcharting API to leverage. One possible idea would be to use [mermaid](https://mermaidjs.github.io/) which takes text input and outputs a chart, which avoid us to have to do the hard work of constructing a chart. The bad news is that it's JavaScript. Assuming nothing better can be found, we can just embed a browser control and r
> I have been using the latest version since PR #4769 was accepted and I just wanted to say that I am really happy with the change, it has made running my tests so much easier.
Specially now that I am going through a massive refactoring, and my unit tests being the only thing that really compiles on its own, it is very useful to be able to run all tests in a given module.
> @bclothier Sorry... just haven't found a moment to look at this. Given that it might be a good few weeks before I can get back on it, I would suggest merging @MDoerner 's PR #4535 first.
@TweetingDuck Never not using no negatives to not confuse nobody?
@this @KySoto Is that something you'd be able to assist with? Since you helped out with the Czech translations? This isn't any push to do it, only a question.
My help was primarily to get it building and some general guidance based on what I saw from other translators. Not the same thing as actually doing it.
@IvenBach I think this may fall flat on most folks accustomed to other languages where double negative don't cancel but intensify or are grammatically required. English is in the minority in that area.
> In a statement after the vote, parliament member Axel Voss — one of the key supporters of the new copyright law — said, “I am convinced that once the dust has settled, the internet will be as free as it is today, creators and journalists will be earning a fairer share of the revenues generated by their works, and we will be wondering what all the fuss was about.”
I don't think anyone here would seriously attempt to enforce a political agenda with Rubberduck. Unless you count lobbying for a proper VBE as political
even if the licenses are incompatible, that doesn't make a difference it's like committing the same change to two repos with the dual license split
We could relicense RD if all contributors agreed. We'd need to redevelop the grammar and remove the smart-indenter affiliation idea, but that's about it
and at this point I'd actually be prepared to call the smart indenter folks for the RD implementation being a sufficiently separate "clean room" implementation
I mean... Comintern fixed multiple really frigging hairy bugs and we're not using the original VB6 source code for RD
The grammar is a bit of a mess anyway. The real problem would be getting ThunderFrame to relicense his code, and the other contributors who disappeared.
As far as I'm concerned, you can keep my commits as GPL, or relicense them to MIT or Apache 2.0. I don't see it ever happening, but you have my pre-approved permission.
@Vogel612 TBF, that is an unsettling idea. Even setting aside the pain/grief, why involve in a complex licensing question for which the heir has no idea / knowledge?
PARAMETERS cid TEXT (7)
,dt DATETIME;
INSERT INTO dbo_Engineering_Trace_ProcedureChangeRequest (
ChangeID
,[Procedure]
,DateOfRequest
)
SELECT [cid] AS Expr1
,"" AS Expr2
,[dt] AS Expr3
all of the rest of the fields not listed have defaults or are nullable
Select Case argChangeType
Case ctMasterChange
sql2 = "qryVisualMasterChangeChild"
Case ctProcessChange
sql2 = "qryManufacturingProcessChangeChild"
Case ctProcedureChange
sql2 = "qryProcedureChangeRequestChild"
Case ctDrawingChange
sql2 = "qryDrawingChangeRequestChild"
Case ctSoftwareChange
sql2 = "qrySoftwareChangeChild"
Case ctHardwareChange
sql2 = "qryHardwareChangeChild"
Case ctPCN
sql2 = "qryPCNChild"
Case Else
@this i actually thought i had gotten them, but to be fair, there were very very limited circumstances where the errors could have been triggered, and they were really only triggerable because of changes in the InDev copy of the application.
i finally pulled the trigger and deleted hte fields that didnt need to be there, and i think im good
VBA Rubberducking
VBA Rubberducking