> The actual problem here is that the CodeString constructor taking an explicit selection removes the pseudo caret character at the selection and that the new position is computed as one to the right nonetheless. This means that we try to set the the position to the right of the code. This causes an exception we do not handle for some reason.
no problem! this one is where the Rubberduck devs hang out - we build an open-source plug-in that enhances the glorious VBE, which Microsoft abandoned since 1998
and there's plenty to work on, at every skill level
> Trial period expires in 3 days. Select plan to keep running your builds. After trial period is over only projects with public repositories will run. If you have any questions or need to extend your trial feel free to contact us.
Hi, Are lLbound and cElements both structs please? In [this](https://bytecomb.com/vba-internals-whats-in-a-variable/) is states the following:
consider the following snippet:
Dim myArray() As Long ReDim myArray(1 to 2, -3 to 3) myArray(1,-1) = 5 1 2 3 Dim myArray() As Long ReDim myArray(1 to 2, -3 to 3) myArray(1,-1) = 5
To the VBA programmer, no methods have been invoked. But behind the scenes the VB runtime has been busy. The ReDim statement invokes all of the following: Call SafeArrayAllocDescriptor : Create the SAFEARRAY header structure Set the lLbound and cElements properties on of each the two SAFEARRAYBOUND structures in the new SAFEARRAY’s rgsabound array.
I am trying to work out what the "Set the lLbound and cElements properties on of each the two SAFEARRAYBOUND structures in the new SAFEARRAY’s rgsabound array" refers to when stating "two SAFEARRAYBOUND structures"
I assume it means lLbound and cElements are SAFEARRAYBOUND structs?
*Please ignore the random 1 2 3 line numbers pasted there. Apologies.
And, no, the article is not entirely correct in its statement. There is one SAFEARRAYBOUNDS struct, which is an array over tuples. In memory, the LBound and cElements alternate. Were these two struct containing the elements for all dimensions, you would see all lbounds and then all cElements or the other way around.
The meaning you understood is the right one. It is just that the sentence in the article is not completely correct technically.
Ok, I read it again. No, your understanding is not correct.
There are two instances of the struct SAFEARRAYBOUND, which is the tuple (cElements, lbound).
The example has two instances because the array has two dimensions.
Any idea why I'm getting this when I load my SSIS project in VS?
Message text is:
> Error loading Package.dtsx: The connection "" is not found. This error is thrown by Connections collection when the specific connection element is not found. C:\Users\<me>\source\repos\Integration Services Project1\Integration Services Project1\Package.dtsx 1
Everything works just fine when I run the package. i.e. it will load data as expected
I've looked at all my defined connections and they all seem to have names, so the "" is a bit confusing to me.
I haven't deleted any connections from the package (that I'm aware of), so it shouldn't be a left over from something
SSIS package has a funny habit of ..... misplacing elements. To get rid of that, you need to open up the dtsx as a XML file and find elements that aren't in used (e.g. its' GUID isn't used anywhere else) and delete the element.
@MathieuGuindon Duck check: Is it best practice to explicitly show both overrides. Would it be taboo for != to simply negate ==? That way both are always guaranteed to be opposites.
I've seen this syntax show up, and have tried to google for it's definition to no avail; what does it mean when a dp is bound this way?
<Grid>
<ContentControl Content="{Binding}"/>
</Grid>
I was under the assumption that you have to bind to some property on the DataContext, or another elem...
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4383?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#4383](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4383?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/49d5bfb9e9d3e92e4a80acdb2af68123827bbf02?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.91%`. > The diff coverage is `n/a`.
@IvenBach yup. very useful for generating keys for reporting e.g. select all calendar weeks, all categories, all customer types; cross-join them all, get a table with a record for every calendar week + category + customer type.
I mean, I wouldn't mind reconsidering it once resolver is 100% where it needs to be, no inspections yield any false positives, quickfixes and refactorings never refuctor anything, and we have all the features we've ever dreamed of :)
Each grouping grid acts as if it has its own backing field.
IE they all initialize to the same default value 250 happens to be what I'm using. But when I change the width of ResultsByOutcome the other two groupings don't change.
It's me not understanding everything I'm working with. Binding, XAML templates, Logical/Visual tree, etc... When everything is piled one on top of another and interrelated it's easy for me to get lost.
Being able to achieve seeing an autoproperty on the view model being set let me know I was doing enough correct.
I'm confused as to how when only one view model is created it has the width field behave as it's distinct for each CollectionViewSource
That's some cargo-cultist BS you read there. Whether it's a good practice or not depends on what you're doing with the recordset. All it's doing in this case, is delay the entering of the loop. — Mathieu Guindon10 secs ago
I've seen this syntax show up, and have tried to google for it's definition to no avail; what does it mean when a dp is bound this way?
<Grid>
<ContentControl Content="{Binding}"/>
</Grid>
I was under the assumption that you have to bind to some property on the DataContext, or another elem...
VBA Rubberducking
VBA Rubberducking