« first day (2997 days earlier)      last day (183 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@Duga I'm not that happy with how the test was changed, because I can't verify the way the option was supposed to work in the first place... I also don't like that there is no added test case...
 
REFRESH!
[Minesweeper] 95 Games Played. 49 Bombs Used. 12865 Moves Performed. 17 New Users
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 60 additions. 0 deletions. 3 commits
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 7082d835 on next: AppVeyor build failed
BUILD FAILURE!
 
12:28 AM
@Duga ah... it seems to be the release creation process
 
1:02 AM
ah, the token expired again
 
1:37 AM
@MathieuGuindon is the expiration based on date? or on recent usage?
(or rather lack thereof)
 
yeah it's date-based (selectable, I put 90 days)
 
my ISP has been "upgrading" my package to some "preview" 1GBps connection. Speed's completely stupid crazy fast and my browser and git are losing random packets!
everything works fine if I turn off the Ethernet adapter and use wifi
I decided I wasn't going to upgrade :D
 
2:11 AM
> :white_check_mark: Build Rubberduck 2.5.2.6111 completed (commit github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/7424cbcec5 by @rubberduck-vba-releasebot)
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) Report
> Merging [#6010](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) (b288249) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/9059983548e456c8452218ec
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) Report
> Merging [#6010](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) (b288249) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/9059983548e456c8452218ec
 
2:23 AM
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) Report
> Merging [#6010](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) (b288249) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/9059983548e456c8452218ec
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) Report
> Merging [#6010](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/6010?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberduck-vba) (b288249) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/9059983548e456c8452218ec
 
2:46 AM
bwahaha it was the "register for COM interop" checkbox
 
 
6 hours later…
9:15 AM
> see page: https://github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/wiki/VB,-VBA,-VBE-and-COM-References

The Hyperlinks to the Microsoft pages:
- VBA language Specification
- Office VBA File Format Structure
must start with https:// instead of http://

The Tech Ed 2000 presentation seems to be dead.

Offline Office VBA Help Files leads to an archived repo with no content but maybe it's accessible through history.
 
9:57 AM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit b288249e on next: 97.34% (target 0.00%)
 
11:01 AM
@MathieuGuindon Glad you posted that - it prompted me to go run a speedtest on my machine. I'm getting the same mid-100 speeds with and without my VPN connected. Not good on a 1GB connection. Now I have to call my ISP.
 
11:33 AM
> Fix #5929 .
The 'then'-Statement triggered an Indent even tough the line got continued with ':'.
Edited Test for IfThenElseOnSameLine to contain valid VBA Code and check #5929
 
12:42 PM
> In think the Indenter does exactly what it should.
As @nVenticDW discoverd the Indention ist dependent on the 'Align Continuation'-Setting

If Enabled the continuation is aligned behind the Assignment Operator (Not as assumend by @Vogel612 at the "="-String)
```
' Ignore Operator
Sub Test()
foo = bar _
& baz
End Sub

' Don't Ignore Operators
Sub a()
foo = bar _
& baz
End Sub

```

If 'Align Continuation' is diabled the continuation is Aligned to th
 
1:12 PM
> This PR fixes also #5355
 
 
2 hours later…
3:57 PM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 749024a1 on next: AppVeyor build succeeded
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 749024a1 on next: 97.58% (target 0.00%)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:51 PM
> **Rubberduck version information**

Version 2.5.2.6062
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.19042.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office x64
Host Version: 16.0.14931.20660
Host Executable: MSACCESS.EXE

**Description**
Code inspection shows "*so and so routine* is not used" for form control events (largely buttons, from what I can tell).

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Refresh code.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/54177882/185759987-70026d32-fa0d
 
 
6 hours later…
11:48 PM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 1628 stars vs. [decalage2/oletools] 2170 stars
 

« first day (2997 days earlier)      last day (183 days later) »