A Reverse dots-and-boxes puzzle inspired by @jafe
Albert and Robinson are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
The players take turns adding one plane in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray contours in the below image). Albert goes first.
If a move completes a $1\...
A Reverse dots-and-boxes puzzle inspired by @jafe
Albert and Robinson are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
The players take turns adding one plane in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray contours in the below image). Albert goes first.
If a move completes a $1\...
@msh210 if your "Scar" is a Lion King reference, then the "obvious" way to make the clue work is as a double def where "rising" has the sense of "[aiming at] gaining in power/status/wealth/...". So e.g. AMBITIOUS would kinda-sorta work, though I'm not sure it's close enough to "rising".
@GarethMcCaughan I highly doubt I'd have used a double definition where the same meaning of the answer is used for both parts of the clue. (Hence also no CENT for my clue above.)
Well, what do you expect from cryptic clues? All the time, creatures are eaten, have their tails and heads chopped off and their hearts extracted. That inclues dogs, of course.
Gestures to stop Jacks' paving stones
Oh! Tiny reformation chaos at data transmission
Occasion (the first) to initiate moderator election
Circular execution of queer joshes up with issue
Rearrangement of a sodium unit
Even thou imp, ... our wit!
Encrpytion dev...
On a Sunday morning while having your morning tea or coffee, you hear a knock on the door. You go to the door, but find no one only 3 boxes. You open the biggest one and find a penguin.You open the next one and see there is a cage with a parrot. When you open the smallest one you find a frog.What...
@jafe Was literally just about to post here when I saw your comment come up just now, intending to query the etiquette of combining answers. Totally didn't spot you guys had a chat going on all this while, sorry!
So what is generally considered the right way to resolve two answers which between them solve all of a list of clues?
@Stiv often the scenario is that one person solved the biggest part... in that case i think it's simples to just put everything in that answer (with proper credit)
if there are a lot of people solving, it might be a better idea to make one wiki answer with everyone's answers instead
@msh210 The question of copyright hasn't come up before. I don't think anyone is intending to take other people's C4 clues and sell them. However, they are archived in a spreadsheet as well as in the chat archives here, and I think if you aren't comfortable with that then you should probably refrain from playing.
I am not a lawyer and no one should trust my guess at exactly what any of that means, but I'm very sure it means that anything you post here is de facto licensed to Stack Exchange itself, and fairly sure it means that it's available for anyone to use, under the terms of the appropriate Creative Commons licence. (Which does e.g. require suitable attribution, so you aren't giving anyone permission to flat out steal your stuff and pretend it's theirs.)
Now that those clues are solved, (1) is "by" a good wordplay to wordplay connector? (2) Doesn't FLAGS for "Jacks" require a, "for example" or a question mark?
I have seen "with", and in recent cases, "has" as wordplay to wordplay connectors but "by" used like that isn't very common to my eyes. Of course, maybe I am not solving enough cryptic clues but that looked a bit iffy to me
I might use "with" between definition and wordplay if I absolutely had to, but I wouldn't feel good about it. Definitely wouldn't use "by" or "has" there.
My stock answer — What answer to accept is entirely at the asker's discretion; usually they pick the "best" answer, using whatever criteria they feel to be best. As I've mentioned previously, some reward the answer that contains the most significant contribution(s), and some choose to reward the answer which is most complete. Ideally, these are the same answer—the person with the greatest contribution also adds the contributions of others, with attribution, to make a single canonical answer
@DanielSchepler For puzzles with multiple pieces like this one, some people award the checkmark to the person who contributed the most correct solutions (and optionally give more weight to harder entries, to help break ties.) It's nice to specify a rule in advance, but not necessary. This reduces the angst in picking which answer to accept. Of course, sometimes the person with the most contributions makes the decision an easy one by consolidating all the solutions (with credit to their posters) into their own answer, which is also fine. As is a community wiki, if someone is ok forgoing rep. — Rubio ♦Mar 17 '18 at 1:22
I'm starting a new series in which I set a very specific goal with a unique (to be more specifically defined here in a bit) answer in which the solver must construct a chess position, sometimes a game, using given information. My questions are sure to be very defined as to not be close as too bro...