« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2613 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@0celo7 sadly I'm about to slump into my armchair with a beer and my current book. I started work 11 hours ago so I'm fading now.
 
Right. I get it :)
 
@0celo7 I think you won't like Gromov's writing
But it's coauthored so that's better
 
@0celo7 What balls? I just realized that John's messages about combing hedgehog testicles are missing on the starboard for a long time :P.
 
probably
@anonymous Hairy ball theorem says you can't do that
 
(removed)
 
6:04 PM
@BalarkaSen Hehe :'D
 
why don't we call it the Kiwi theorem?
 
Hedgehog testes aren't that hairy !
 
@BalarkaSen Lee calls the ham sandwich theorem the "Tofu Sandwich Theorem"
@anonymous ...how do you know?
 
@0celo7 I saw them
 
Why were you looking at hedgehog testes?
The people deserve an answer
 
6:09 PM
busted
 
@0celo7 I am really curious about the reproductive system. :'D
 
just go watch some hentai, jesus
 
What do folks think of this comment
Without any idea of the noise sources (including the amplifiers), the question is useless in any practical sense. As a homework exercise, well, that runs afoul of the general homework policy. And the question is worded, well, horribly. — Jon Custer 3 mins ago
 
@0celo7 That's gross
 
and looking at hedgehog nuts isn't??
 
hey
6:10 PM
Hii
 
@0celo7 -_- Hedgehogs don't wear clothes.
 
you're hopeless
good luck in prison
 
LOL. See you there! :'D
 
hey
Can I ask a chemistry question ? Of high school level
 
@anonymous they won't take me alive
 
6:13 PM
Top of the world ma?
 
@hey Go on!
 
@hey we only allow PhD level questions in here.
 
hey
We have to find among the following in which dehydration can take place .

I think it should be first option as there would be resonance when carbon is formed.
 
Oh god. Organic chemistry. It is allowed @hey
 
hey
Thanks man
@0celo7 do you love organic
 
6:15 PM
@hey What is the reagent?
conc. H2SO4 ?
 
I think it should be (1) too. There's an intra-molecular hydrogen bond happening, so it's easier to extract up the water molecule, roughly.
 
@hey Organic is PhD level chemistry.
 
I don't understand the resonance logic though.
 
@BalarkaSen That is bad reasoning. Dehydration will destroy the hydrogen bonding if that happens. That is at best an hindrance and not a cause.
 
hey
@anonymous no reagent is given just asking maximum dehydration
 
6:17 PM
@anonymous Dehydration just extracts the H2O molecule: why should it destroy the hydrogen bond? I don't understand that.
 
hey
@0celo7 but there is a school level exam in which it was asked
 
If anything it should break the C-O and C-H bonds.
 
@BalarkaSen Initially there is intramolecular H bonding but after dehydration there isn't.
 
@hey not in America!
@ALL "Cookies and Cream" poptarts actually taste like Oreos
 
hey
@0celo7 in India there is such exam , if you have heard of it . IIT JEE
 
6:20 PM
@anonymous I don't see that as a sufficient reason. Maybe after the C - O and the C - H bond breaks, the attraction formed by the H-bond in H --- O makes them have a covalent bond?
Sounds plausible by common sense
"proof by common sense"
 
@hey the JEE is insane by our standards
harder than college
 
@DanielSank I think he's right...the question doesn't talk about noise at all.
 
Actually all of them can get dehydrated with (conc) H2SO4 as a 2 degree carbon is formed. But first option will provide conjugation with C=O.
So that would be my best bet.
 
hey
@0celo7 lol
 
vzn
@anonymous lol pop science ... are you a student? physics? what country?
 
6:22 PM
@BalarkaSen "the attraction formed by the H-bond in H --- O makes them have a covalent bond?"....what do you mean? I don't really get you.
 
@BalarkaSen I know you don't care for analysis but that parabolic PDE PEU is very interesting. Lots of applications to geometry (curvature flows).
 
@vzn Yeah it is a pop science book :) We spoke earlier in Physics Meta chat room.
 
@Mostafa Did you try to say something?
Were you silenced by the IIT?
oh god they killed him
 
vzn
@anonymous yes cant recall much or maybe you didnt say much :| ... fyi there are some excellent documentaries on LHC you might enjoy. also note that carroll book is pre-higgs discovery
 
@0celo7 Don't get fooled by the appearance...it's just lots of lots of techniques and things to memorize
 
6:24 PM
The H-bond acts as an attraction between the H and the O atom (indeed, it's about 1/10-th of the attraction happening with covalent bonds). After breaking of the C - H and C = O bonds, maybe the attraction gets them close enough for them to form a covalent bond by sharing of electrons?
That's all I meant
I personally don't understand your logic by conjugation, but then I don't know much about chemistry. If you want to explain I'll listen
 
@Mostafa Memorization is so hard
 
@BalarkaSen C = O bonds don't break during dehydration...
 
hey
@anonymous and @BalarkaSen answer is given as second option
 
@0celo7 Yeah, I heard.
@hey Strange!
 
@BalarkaSen *PDE REU
 
6:26 PM
But it works for a good portion of the questions on these exams...
 
@hey Yeah, that is the second best option as the first option hydrogen bond is destroyed inside the molecule.
 
@anonymous have you memorized the periodic table?
 
> Therefore, the global existence and existence of solutions
 
The (+) charge will be in conjugation after hydride shift
 
Hmm.
 
6:27 PM
(I did)
 
@Mostafa Yeah.
 
@anonymous oic. i dunno the mechanism
what happens?
 
@hey That's what I and balarka were talking about. The initial hydrogen bonding inside the molecule stabilizes it so greatly that dehydration would make it somewhat less stable. But in the second option there is no initial hydrogen bonding.
 
@anonymous That's a good way to get round many time-consuming chemistry questions....
 
@Mostafa Hehe. It is useful. True. But we are expected to know it anyway :)
Direct questions are never asked though.
 
6:30 PM
chem is strange and hard
 
The best (only?) way to get a high score is such exams to be prepared for difficult time-consuming analytical questions, solve them apriori and memorize the results. (and answer from your memory)
 
@0celo7 I also memorized 350 words in 5 days for the general GRE 2 years ago.
 
@Mostafa Doesn't work in JEE :P Good for school exams though :)
Chem is easy once you devote sufficient time to it.
I personally love organic chem :)
 
That's what I'm bad at
 
6:33 PM
Isn't chemistry the easiest subject of the test?
 
Yeah it is ^
 
JEE is insane.
 
i know right?
 
@anonymous Have you ever scored above 90%?
on chemistry
 
You could be masters of PDE if you didn't have to devote all this time to trivial trivia.
That's what this seems like, trivia.
You're never going to use this.
 
6:35 PM
@Mostafa In school I always scored above 90. In JEE advanced mocks never crossed 70-75 :/.
 
who wants to be masters of pde dude
that's a worthless goal
 
@BalarkaSen Isn't Classical Physics just study of PDEs?
 
do topology instead. cool pictures
 
@Mostafa no
 
:|
 
6:37 PM
i certainly wouldn't want to be a master of classical physics instead though!
 
@0celo7 Not everything is done for a goal. I personally love studying the JEE topics. I do the physics, chem and maths out of love. Scoring marks in the exam is secondary. I don't even want to be an engineer.
 
The best strategy to study is to give up
 
@anonymous I love math but I would not want to study hard integrals
That's what the JEE seems to be like
 
@Bernardo yeah man who cares
 
@0celo7 That's like saying I love cricket but I don't want to learn bowling.
 
6:39 PM
JEE is a good, hard set of puzzles. I wouldn't belittle it. I can't do half of them in finite time.
 
I'm not belittling it
I'm saying puzzles are stupid
 
Honestly though, if you need good grades just accept it, sell your soul and bust your ass for a month solving problems until you get okay
 
But it is indeed not a good prototype of mathematics as done by the actual world
 
@BalarkaSen I'm taking topology this semester
Anything I should know beforehand?
 
Not all of math is puzzles.
 
6:41 PM
@0celo7 ?
 
@Bernardo A bit of analysis won't do much harm.
 
It it weren't for the tough puzzles I wouldn't even appear for JEE. They provide the thrill. Just like olympiads. I have all my life to do mainstream maths. Why worry about it now?
 
Why are you taking topology?
 
@BalarkaSen Already took that last semester
@0celo7 because it's on my Analysis II syllabus
 
You're going to do metric spaces
 
6:42 PM
You should do Chapter 2 of Rudin if you really want to get an idea.
 
Holy fuck, Fantano rekd Future
 
@BernardoMeurer Good, then you're more or less ok
 
Yeah he did. Did you not see my message?
 
@BalarkaSen I should have gotten that book and forgot
@0celo7 Yes, I'm replying to that
 
Aha
 
6:42 PM
@0celo7 I told you already I got a new syllabus
Worse one possibly
 
@BalarkaSen I don't like solving over 200 multiple choice problems in 4 hours. I like focusing and thinking on one problem in that time.
 
I feel like Fantano is just disappointed a lot
 
@anonymous Sure, that's fine. You should do whatever that makes you happy.
I have personally never felt the Olympiads, or JEE type problems very interesting.
Maybe momentarily, but not for a long time to stick to it
 
@BalarkaSen I love classical physics!
just starting to read this:
 
@Mostafa You shouldn't do it then. Focus on what makes you happy.
 
6:47 PM
God, I hate Quavo
Lil Uzi scares the shit out of me
 
> In this book, a central theme will be a Geometric Principle: The laws of physics must
all be expressible as geometric (coordinate-independent and reference-frame-independent) relationships
between geometric objects (scalars, vectors, tensors, ...), which represent physical
entitities.
 
@BernardoMeurer QUAVO
 
From that book ^
 
@BernardoMeurer what's wrong with Uzi now :(
 
He's a mutant
I like Post, he's kind and sweet
 
6:50 PM
He's not the biggest mutant
 
@0celo7 did you ever hear the album i gave you
 
Boat is a freak
@BalarkaSen no! Please send it to me
I was wondering about it the other day
 
It's like Yatchy, I hate him too
He sounds so stupid it hurts
 
there @0celo7
It's totally my favorite now, along with Earthling (the next album)
 
@BernardoMeurer If you can't take the heat, get out the streets
 
6:52 PM
David Bowie is so...on the edge.
 
@0celo7 'Cause it get cold like Minnesota
 
@skillpatrol He's awesome
 
@BernardoMeurer I think we're getting a Drake album this Friday.
 
I don't care for Drake
 
6:56 PM
@BalarkaSen how about pink floyd?
 
@BernardoMeurer he is very monotone, I can't stand him on solo tracks
But his collabs are always excellent
 
He's a bag of crazy ideas. I mean the album I linked is about 7 different people or something involved in an underground crime hysteria about murder art, which is, in short, mutilation and making art out of the victims
@skillpatrol Haven't heard a lot by them but they're ok
 
@BernardoMeurer check out Gucci Mane and Drake "both"
It's good
 
@BalarkaSen sounds like Edgar Allen Poe :P
Or the silence of the lambs
 
yeah, but darker. 1.Outside and Earthling is more or less a textural diary of the last couple years of the century (or millennium)
 
7:02 PM
(removed)
 
What?
I missed it
 
Everyone stop.
john custer knows how to design Chebychev filters
@DanielSank - you always want your input signal range to be as close as possible to the ADC full scale (except of course when noise kills you). This is not a particularly deep physics question. And, as many find out, noise sources are the real limiter. On the other hand, I know how to design and build a 4-pole Chebyshev band pass filter... — Jon Custer 19 mins ago
 
@DanielSank is this significant?
 
@DanielSank Only 4-poles? I can design with 6 poles and even more :P
@0celo7 It was about Drake appearing in Justin Bieber's Baby
 
7:20 PM
@101010111100 Here is one of my favorites: "The algorithm fathoms in a synergetic manner globally, and an antagonistic depth quest locally.". Whatever that means! — Coconut Feb 19 at 7:15
What does it mean? :/ ^
 
duh, it means that the algorithm fathoms in a synergetic manner globally, and an antagonistic depth quest locally
5
 
7:34 PM
Yeah! What else could it mean?
 
hello all
 
hi
how are you?
 
good @skillpatrol, yourself?
 
Fine, thanks.
 
@heather Hi there
who starred that?
 
7:39 PM
(removed)
 
once again, the starring patterns of this chat have proved elusive
5
:-P
¬¬
 
lol
another devious twist in starring patterns
 
nah. predictable
 
7:42 PM
nah. predictable
 
( ͡o ͜ʖ ͡o)
 
predictable. nah
 
o_0
 
The h-Bar's become chaotic...Where's ACM
 
7:47 PM
0_o
 
Wow
For once this wasn't my fault
 
@BernardoMeurer What, all the stars?
 
The room suddenly became unstable
 
i think spacetime is dilating around this room...
 
7:55 PM
@DanielSank Something to do with the Big Bang or something. Like it all exploded and then we got stars from that when the universe was born
 
@heather time is the one that dilates
(removed)
(removed)
 
These mods are removing everything
 
What's going on? who's starring everything?
 
I think I'm gonna go ahead and remove these random stars
 
can you?
 
8:04 PM
@Danu They aren't random, they are a scream against the oppressive regime we live in
@Danu The stars on the removed message were clearly a meta-joke
 
@BernardoMeurer You're probably semi-joking, but I don't think it is particularly funny. If you have a serious complaint about the PSE moderators then do something with it; if not, maybe just consider cutting it out.
 
@Danu You'll never know, I'm the Schrodinger critic
 
Never know... what?
 
@Danu Exactly.
 
:)
 
8:12 PM
:)
 
8:24 PM
@ACuriousMind you should be proud of me. I just went to a seminar on linear algebra and algebraic geometry
 
Seminar on linear algebra?
So how'd they apply algebraic geometry in linear algebra (or vice versa?!?!)
 
I tried to take a course on algebraic geometry once.
It sounded so awesome, but I didn't understand the first lecture so I didn't take it.
I was sad.
 
Haha
Was it more classical algebraic geometry
or more like schemes and stuff?
 
As I said, I didn't understand it.
Schemes? I don't remember any schemes.
I remember a sheath or some such thing.
 
@DanielSank Sometimes they tell you something about the general outline of the course at the start :P
@DanielSank Sheaves
That sounds like classical stuff. Really nice and beautiful
I know a little bit about classical algebraic geometry but none of the more modern stuff
But I think you can also do a lot of sheaf stuff in the more modern approach
so who knows what you were subjected to
 
8:30 PM
I had posted a link that I was hoping would sit on the star board for a while. It had 6 stars, but was bumped by what looked some some other folks playing around with the stars.
So here's the link again
 
In any case, the concept of a sheaf is not TERRIBLY hard---it just seems a little bit of an unnatural thing until you get a big picture kind of understanding of what kind of problems they are used to solve (again, in classical alg. geom.)
 
I think sheaves classically came up from complex analysis
also I think you're using the term classical algebraic geometry for complex algebraic geometry
 
Yeah, they were definitely useful in the theory of Riemann surfaces
@BalarkaSen But isn't that what the classical stuff is?
 
@DanielSank One comment: I don't support saying that the highest-voted proposal will be used
 
8:32 PM
(mostly)
 
@Danu Well, it's the analysis seminar, so it was about von Neumann algebras
 
Well, I just mostly think of the classical stuff as varieties.
 
But he was only considering finite-dimensional ones
 
The story is actually sort of subtle over arbitrary alg closed fields than C
 
@BalarkaSen Okay, but that's essentially complex alg. geom., isn't it?
 
8:32 PM
@DavidZ Can you drop a comment on the document, please?
 
@Danu Over C
 
@BalarkaSen I see
 
But he didn't explain what he was doing had to do with those
 
@DanielSank sure, later
 
He's studying hadamard matrices
 
8:33 PM
@DavidZ Thank you.
 
Fair enough---I come at it from an "(algebraic) GEOMETRY" kind of perspective of course @Balarka :)
 
And those lie on varieties, apparently. But he forgot the word for variety and kept calling them "manifolds"
 
@Danu Yeah. I dunno much about anything so take my opinion as a grain of salt anyway!
 
@0celo7 Maybe he actually meant manifolds?
@BalarkaSen Actually
 
So people kept asking him what these things were supposed to be
@Danu nah, he corrected himself eventually
 
8:34 PM
Do you know anything about whether other kind of fields are interesting from a topology/geometry perpsective?
Are finite fields useful at all?
 
But my topology prof eventually erupted with "AH, they're varieties," and all of the analysts in the room were still clueless
 
@JohnRennie Strange but true. Upvotes get you no reputation points, but bounties and, I believe, acceptances do.
 
Anyway, not very interesting. But I want to see the sequel
@BalarkaSen what's a hopf algebra?
 
@Danu Oh yeah the story for finite fields is very much interesting even though I know absolutely nothing about it. There's the Frobenius endomorphism story (basically counting fixed points of a diophantine eqn over a variety over F_p^n), and eventually gives you a Lefschetz-like formula
 
@BalarkaSen I'm looking for applications to geometry/topology (of the smooth kind)
I'd really like to find some sort of good motivation for all the algebraic stuff
 
8:37 PM
@0celo7 It's both an algebra and a coalgebra. You have a multiplication $X \times X \to X$ and a comultiplication $X \to X \times X$.
 
But so far I can't escape the feeling that it's more for its own sake (more general versions of originally geometric ideas etc)
 
@BalarkaSen comultiolocation? (Wow autocorrect doesn't even try on that one)
*comultiplication
 
@Danu Ah, that is much harder. The best I can do is present it to you as a "generalization" of what happens in $\Bbb C$ to what happens in other fields. Indeed, through most of the algebraic algebraic geometry I learnt I took that as a motivation: take a theorem in complex. Is it true in arbitrary fields? To what extent? How does the picture generalize?
That finite field story, eg, gives you something unexpectedly topological (the Lefschetz fixed point formula)
 
@BalarkaSen Yeah, but for me that in itself does not sound so attractive, somehow.
Not to sound too dismissive or anything
I just don't know any reasons to care, you know?
 
I understand that feeling.
I went through a lot of that when I started learning this stuff. But in the end I found it a fun endeavor.
 
8:43 PM
@Danu I'm not a civil engineer
 
@heather They do. But community approval measures popularity, not directly whether a proposal is good or not.
 
8:55 PM
@BalarkaSen pls talk to me about hopf algebras
They will show up in the next analysis seminar
 
@0celo7 what do you wanna know
 
What a comultiplication is. I googled it and got a commutative diagram. I don't think in terms of those...
 
@0celo7 It's a certain map $X \to X \times X$. I mentioned that before.
 
@BalarkaSen yeah, I saw that. What does it do?
 
i think this could be mod hammered
0
Q: About composite materials

Liao Zhu Dear everyone I am so happy if somebody can help me to deal with these equations.

 
9:00 PM
How was Chicago? @0celo7
 
@skillpatrol mostly good
 
@0celo7 It can do literally anything, except that there's an identity. I forget what the right notion of that is but I think it's that there's an $e \in X$ such that $h(e, x)$ and $h(x, e)$ are both identity.
@0celo7 Sorry, sorry, total garbage. Forget I ever said that
So I think identity is a map $e : X \to X$ instead.
 
Popcorn is served.
Enjoy
Did you decide on the textbook yet? @BernardoMeurer
 
bye, everybody
 
@skillpatrol No. I asked the prof and he just made it worse
 
9:15 PM
Cya
 
@DanielSank, have a good day.
 
he told me to get the Giancoli, then Daniel told me to get kleppner and kolenkow, and someone here said Halliday
So now I have no clue
 
Did the prof suggested Giancoli? @BernardoMeurer
 
@skillpatrol Yep
But that one has "For Engineers" in it
I hate that
 
Which is the cheapest?
 
vzn
9:20 PM
@DavidZ btw thx for plugging the special guest session in regular mtg, wasnt able to make regular mtg, wanted to :(
 
@BernardoMeurer rob suggested a good one.
 
@BernardoMeurer Giancoli sucks, I must say.
 
You guys are going to make me cry, I swear
 
There's a nice color-and-everything version on da webz
 
Everyone likes a different book and thinks another one sucks
 
9:34 PM
What was the name of rob's suggestion?
 
I'm trying to find it in chat search but there are too many robs
 
@BernardoMeurer Theif!
 
@BalarkaSen Are you here? I want to talk about $P^2\vee P^2$
 
go ahead
 
@DanielSank It's on my passport
 
9:47 PM
Feb 10 at 1:21, by rob
@BernardoMeurer We teach our freshman majors out of Chabay and Sherwood. Every time I reread a chapter, I think "Yes, that's totally how real physicists think about this sort of problem." I like that text a lot.
 
@skillpatrol Right, that's the one that's worth it's weight in gold
 
You gotta pay for quality.
 
@BalarkaSen So the universal cover is just $S^2\vee S^2\vee\cdots$, but what exactly is the group action? I guess one should pick some distinguished two spheres first, then the generators move the spheres from left and right to the middle, alternating?
 
@0celo7 You mean to say, the action of $\Bbb Z/2 * \Bbb Z/2$ on this? Mark the infinite chain of spheres by even and odd numbers resp. The first copy of $\Bbb Z/2$ acts by antipodal map on some fixed even sphere, while flipping the two infinite chain of spheres attached at antipodal points. Same with the second copy with odd spheres.
 
Hopefully I got all the right ones, let me know if not
 
9:55 PM
some popcorn stuff got in there
 
who cares
 
and your move to the meta room comment's there
 
@heather I thought that was part of it :-P
 
but otherwise looks like everything's right
 
@BalarkaSen oh come on
 
9:56 PM
@DavidZ lol, I didn't think so =)
 
@0celo7 ?
 
@BalarkaSen don't be negative
 
@heather Eh, well, if people really want those moved back, I'll do it. I don't think it's a big deal though.
 
@DavidZ What are you talking about?
 
i'm ambivalent, not negative
 
9:59 PM
@DavidZ no, not a big deal at all =)
 
What did your prof think of rob's suggestion? @BernardoMeurer
 
10:28 PM
@BalarkaSen Flipping two infinite chains?
That's what's in Hatcher, but I don't understand it
I'll think more
 

« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2613 days later) »