« first day (2575 days earlier)      last day (1108 days later) » 

HNQ
9:30 AM
8
Q: Is the physics of a Quantum Field Theory dependent on the choice of Lagrangian?

The Gypsy KingA Quantum Field Theory can be obtained by quantising a Classical Field Theory through to a procedure. The procedure involves starting with a set of equations of motion that describe a Classical Field Theory, then find a Lagrangian that produces that set of equations of motion, then use that Lagr...

 
 
6 hours later…
HNQ
3:37 PM
1
Q: Why isn't the magnetic field defined by the magnetic force on a particle moving through it?

BigbarbadboybabyboobaeA magnetic field describes the influence a charge (in motion) experiences. In other words, it is essentially a vector field that describes the force that a particle will feel at a given location. However, a moving charge experiences a magnetic force that is perpendicular the direction of its magn...

4
Q: Time Dependent Perturbation Theory: How do we know the system stays in the same Hilbert space?

newtothisIn introductory time dependent perturbation theory, I have read that given a system with a Hamiltonian of the form: $H = H^{(0)} + \delta H(t) \tag{0} $ where the $H^{(0)}$ is independent of time and has known eigenstates given by $|n \rangle $. Now, if the perturbation is 'small' then the wave f...

 
 
4 hours later…
HNQ
7:48 PM
2
Q: If a polarized light wave is indistinguishable from its original self after being flipped 180°, why doesn't a photon have a spin of two?

Kurt HikesThe spin of a photon has a counterpart in classical physics, it's polarization, right? And if you spin a polarized light wave by 180°, (or pi radians), it is now the same as before, correct? So why isn't the spin of a photon said to be two, rather than one?

 
 
4 hours later…
HNQ
11:58 PM
3
Q: Why did we expect gravitational mass and inertial mass to be different?

user1551817I've read many times that the fact that gravitational mass is equal to inertial mass (as far as we can tell) used to be a puzzle. I believe that Einstein explained this by showing that gravity is itself just an inertial force. When I first encountered this concept, I thought "isn't there just one...

 

« first day (2575 days earlier)      last day (1108 days later) »