« first day (4512 days earlier)      last day (443 days later) » 

12:25 AM
@Alan 84" in length, 28" in breadth, and 23" in height. STandard casket.
if I remember correctly, a portable hole does not fit a single barrel... I mean, a 18.1"/46 barrels. They are after all 21.13 m long...
 
1:25 AM
You know all those mass data pulls people do on monsters? How and where to go grab those?
 
2:04 AM
@PlayPatrice depends on what system you are talking about
although since no system was listed, I suspect 5E based on my experience of 5E players not realizing other things exist :)
 
@Alan 3.5 - I'm trying to work through the monk / flurry of blows theory crafting. That and I am curious how much my DM held to the hard rules in an old game we played a long time ago.
 
@PlayPatrice yeah, I just saw that question and was coming back here to note that. I can say that in practice, my halfling warlock who targeted touch ACs that I played from about level 1 to 12 pretty much only missed things on 1s, 2s, and the occasional 3 or 4
 
That was the feeling I was getting with the grapple monk I was running, and his STR as a monk was poor (11's-16 throughout his career).
 
That's purely anecdotal from one game of course. And the fact that I was a flying ranged attacker who often attacked out of invis to hit the flat footed touch AC, which was generally jjust 10+deflection bonus :)
 
So I wasn't sure how much it was my DM taking pity on my character concept or if I was stumbling onto something that kinda sorta worked.
 
2:14 AM
yeah, most monsters* are far heavier into natural/armor bonus than other sources of AC, unless they are particularly supernaturally dextrous/or otherwise harder to hit
Armor and natural armor are pretty much open ended high stats that scale very much so into the CRs. Dex is openended but doesn't go that much higher than +3-+5 for most monsters in my experience, and other sources of AC are rare
part of the reason I made that char was I was tired of missing :). I didn't do a lot of damage, comparitive to other 3.5 optimized builds, but it was a danged consistent 1d6+1d6/2 levels, then boosted a bit with magic items as I wwent along
 
Yup - and I'm just trying to break down my "Viability" question into smaller questions to see if I can get some help mathing out what a flurry of blows grapple monk actually looks like. If I can get some help figuing out how to crunch MM numbers - I can then move on to opposed grapple checks / escape artist stuff to see how many "grapples" on average it takes to pin an opponent.
 
nod I gotta run to eat then do some more work on my academic paper, if you haven't found help when I'm free I'll look again
 
Thanks alan.
 
(On a side note, the most broken part of that char wasn't his damage, it was the fact that he was a protoss observer unit....24 hour flight/invisible/see invislble was pretty plot breaky)
 
 
1 hour later…
3:27 AM
2
Q: Anydice: "highest 1 of 3d6 1d12" function. Is this correct?

Victor Julio HurtadoWould anyone that's anydice savvy take a look at this formula and tell if its correct for what I want to do? The idea is that it returns the highest value among the results of rolling three 6-sided dice (3d6) and one 12-sided die (1d12). According to the formula, there's a 75.89% chance that the ...

 
 
1 hour later…
4:44 AM
2
Q: Does a creature with natural attacks need Improved Unarmed Strike to get Improved Grapple?

GiorinI am designing an encounter with a Giant Owl druid companion involved. I wanted the owl to get the Improved Grapple feat as part of the advancement for being a druid companion. The owl would in no way benefit from Improved Unarmed Strike - it already has natural attacks that are lethal and do not...

 
 
2 hours later…
6:51 AM
9
Q: What is the point of Feinting from a distance?

AndrásThis question states that being able to Feint from 30 feet with Grovel is an "unambiguous and clear advantage". I do not see it. Yes, you can make the target flat-footed from afar, but only against your melee attacks. So now instead of Striding to the enemy, then Feinting, then Striking, you can ...

 
 
2 hours later…
8:32 AM
5
Q: How many spells require expensive components for each casting?

DraconisAs someone who doesn't have much Pathfinder experience (and, in particular, is more used to various editions of D&D), I was surprised to read that only seven spells in the SRD include the word "gp". And of those seven, not all of them consume the components: alarm uses a focus that's not consumed...

 
 
2 hours later…
10:30 AM
@PlayPatrice hmm, using no filter on d20srd.org/extras/d20monsterfilter will get you a list of monsters in a table, but not including the ac data you wanted (though each one is linkable, that'd be annoying)
orkerhulen.dk/Own%20made%20supplement/… gets an excel sheet, but again not the data you want
@PlayPatrice enworld.org/threads/old-monsters-new-statblock.193894 has a zipped file with all the monsters full stats in it, you can control f for "touch" and zoom through and see touch ACs that way
 
11:03 AM
7
Q: Can a creature be targeted by future uses of eyebite if they are immune to the initial casting?

Jon AristotleThe party is fighting a masked assassin, and the wizard, wanting to question the assassin, casts Eyebite and attempts to use the Asleep effect. However, the assassin was an elf, and is thus immune to being put to sleep. The next round, the wizard attempts to use the Sickened effect of the spell...

 
 
1 hour later…
12:14 PM
Hmm. Amusingly, I've always interpreted rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7528/… as Rules as Intended :)
 
12
A: What does "Rules As Interpreted" mean and how is it different to Rules as Written and Rules as Intended?

Thomas Markov"Rules as Interpreted" doesn't mean anything. Rules do not exist in a vacuum. The rules of various games are applied at the table, and these applications of rules are always and forever some person's interpretation of those rules. So the issue with "rules as interpreted" is that it means everythi...

 
@ThomasMarkov Reminds me of the arguments around originalist and textualist approaches to US constitutional interpretation, which can often end up swinging on which dictionary you use.
Hmm, question: Point #2 here was about not referencing other answers. https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2993/71804
In my recent answer the vampire question (And other people's as well), references were included, but not in a debate sense, just in a "These aspects of the question were addressed here, and there's no need for me to duplicate them". Is that okay?
 
12:43 PM
@Alan Ive never read that meta.
 
12:59 PM
whelp ,time to try to grab a few hours of sleep
 
 
8 hours later…
8:43 PM
They've done something to break LegacyQuestions.
 

« first day (4512 days earlier)      last day (443 days later) »