> I hate google and don't want to use it but I'm used to it and want to get my IP banned from Google search. My ISP also uses the same IP for hundres of users so I will also be doing others a favour.
I feel like this course could be over in 2 days, if we just 'got on with it'
It's doing the whole 'Here's what we'll do, here's how we'll do it, here's what it achieves, here's how we know, here's what it doesn't do, lets do it'.
Maybe I'm just inheritently tuned into how a software defined network would work
I guess if you've done networking all your life, the 'old' way, then it might be more difficult to adapt.
@ThatBrazilianGuy well yeah but there's a course you do in order to pass the exam. I assume you meant prep for the course rather than prep for the exam. Nvm.
@Burgi That's cause it's his profile picture and his profile's set to be viewable/indexable when not logged in. You can't hide your profile picture in any context where your profile's visible.
@Burgi a git repo inside a git repo, usually used for pulling in dependencies
So you can clone the repo and then say "fetch all of your submodules"
Or make updates to one of the dependencies and commit those changes directly to it rather than faffing around with git subtree to export a patch series
/c/inetpub/wwwroot/alu-18-012-edm/foundation-emails-template (develop)
$ git submodule update --init
fatal: No url found for submodule path './' in .gitmodules
@Burgi ok, first of all, you should just run that from the repo root, but upon testing it should also work inside the submodule (might not initialize all the submodules if you do it that way tho?)
But what it looks like is that that project has a .gitmodules that records a submodule but doesn't have a URL for it
And yeah, after a bit of experimentation this is exactly what happens if you have a submodule "committed" but no .gitmodules entry telling git where to download it from
What I'm getting here is that someone was hired to do a bunch of work, and they did the work, pushed it to prod, didn't check any of it in to version control, and you're the first person to notice :/
Right, I mean, they committed it to git on their machine but it never got pushed to the company git server or went into whatever CI or deployment system you have
Like...they are scared of the fact that the computer automatically chooses where to break lines to keep the text justified, as opposed to running off the edge of the screen?
@allquixotic lol, uh, (i) haven't had a girlfriend in >6 months, (ii) My mom is making me MOVE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY so I think I have the right to complain a bit
My Mi Band 2 was delivered today, and I'm super happy with it. It has notification alerts, a 20-day battery life, tracks fitness and sleep, and doesn't need to be paired to your phone (alarms and the such work without the phone). This is ideal for me.
You should be transparent with your full-time company. Tell them that you are taking on a second job as soon as possible.
The reasons for this are twofold:
They are going to find out when your tax returns come in. Having two jobs affects the amount of tax your are required to pay.
They can cha...
Your main employer will know nothing about you having another job from your tax information, all they get given for PAYE is an anonymised tax code. When you take a second job, that doesn't change and your first employer gets told nothing by HMRC. Your second job will usually have a different tax code, but people get different codes for any number of reasons. That's why they have anonymised codes.
I've spent 3 years working two jobs with one company under one payroll number who couldn't even figure it out right internally, let alone notify the HMRC.
The HMRC don't have enough competence to tax anything other than your first job.
That, by definition, is what happens when things go wrong and not how they're supposed to work normally.
Although some might call it SNAFU, since it's abnormal for the HMRC to get anything right when dealing with anything more complicated than a single, full time, PAYE employer.
And most corporate payroll/HR departments don't have a particularly stellar reputation for competence either.
There's a tick box on one of the tax forms when you start a job that's titled "This is my main or only job". It's your responsibility to use the tickbox correctly, but beyond that there's absolutely nothing you're required to do or tell anyone.
If you tick the box, your tax allowance will get transferred to the new job, and the HMRC will attempt to (and usually fuck up) recalculate your tax allowance and notify your old employer of your new tax code. They tell your old employer nothing other than a change of tax code. If you don't tick the box, HMRC will assume it's a second job and basically give you a zero tax allowance. Some people call this the emergency tax code but that's a misnomer. Your first employer will get told nothing.
> A celebrity Brazilian plastic surgeon known as Dr Bumbum has gone on the run after a woman died following injections he gave her to enlarge her bottom.
You should be transparent with your full-time company. Tell them that you are taking on a second job as soon as possible.
The reasons for this are twofold:
They are going to find out when your tax returns come in. Having two jobs affects the amount of tax your are required to pay.
They can cha...
