« first day (3536 days earlier)      last day (1474 days later) » 

1:20 AM
Github and Heroku: how do you integrate them?
If you have a project on Heroku already posted
How do you get the clone url so you can put it on github?
 
 
11 hours later…
12:49 PM
Considering that nowadays you have some computers running android, do you think a question regarding whatsapp should be off topic? a question regarding whatsapp isnt on topic on android stackexchange cos is not related to the android OS itself.
so whatsapp is a program that often happens to run on the android operating system
 
1:04 PM
Uhh. Ewwww
Also WhatsApp only runs on phones and web
Both are explicitly off topic
 
not only phones.. a person could have a tablet with android
 
2:03 PM
Interesting though, the lines are getting a bit blurrier in some areas
For Android there is a specific SE
(irrespective of WA being off topic)
 
2:44 PM
@barlop @JourneymanGeek There are Windows and MAC downloads - but you must have WhatsApp running on your phone for them to work.
> WhatsApp Desktop are computer based extensions of the WhatsApp account on your phone. The messages you send and receive are fully synced between your phone and your computer, and you can see all messages on both devices. Any action you take on your phone will apply to WhatsApp on your computer and vice versa.
Those would potentially be on topic.
 
Hm
@DavidPostill the desktop clients would be in topic
@barlop you need a working mobile phone line to set up WhatsApp, and a mobile client running. Getting it running on a tablet is possible but erf....
It's going to need some mental gymnastics
 
good point
though whatsapp on windows together with whatsapp on phone, as DP says. could be on topic.
no way it looks like no whatsapp for windows 7! whatsapp.com/download
or rather, apparently works but some limitations
 
3:02 PM
How to capture URL's from Wireshark?
 
@Student404Mus a start might be a reverse DNS lookup on the IP
and for the request part, e.g. /blah.html that may be in the HTTP info
'cos the http request would look like GET /blah.html?abc=123
so there'd be a destination IP and a line like that GET.
 
@barlop DNS that's right
 
also there can be a HOSTNAME header in the HTTP info besides the GET
or Host header rather, that may help.
Re whatsapp I get this screen from whatsapp desktop i.imgur.com/nf8ziL1.png but I can't see anything in whatsapp about reading a QR code
 
but what if the url is secure
 
I don't know.. I guess maybe with an HTTPS URL, maybe your computer can decrypt it?
maybe it's only computers between yours and the destination that can't.
 
3:15 PM
because I tried to navigate to facebook
 
there is then the also the question of whether wireshark supports HTTPS
 
and tried to see If I can see something related
I typed http in filtering
I didn't grab anything
 
Start with just an http site first
and see if you can do it with that
 
Ok, I am running utorrent
 
I suggest setting up your own HTTP server a basic thing.
and run tests with that
 
3:17 PM
and tha't all what I found related to urls
 
I don't see the relevance of utorrent
 
maybe the trackers
 
what are you talking about.. I am talking about using wireshark in a very simple way
 
Okay
I 'm following you
I just wanted to mention
what i tried so far.
.
 
try simple things first and build up.
then you see what you can and can't do.
basic troubleshooting.
so set up a web server so you can do 127.0.0.1/blah.html Then see what wireshark can figure out from that. See if you see blah.html from wireshark.
Then see if you still can when it is https.
 
3:22 PM
As you said before, I can see those things, like "GET", and "POST"
 
so do you see GET /blah.html ?
 
just a minute
 
and if so, what about if it is https on the web server and in your web browser?
 
Host: ocsp.godaddy.com\r\n
but no html relevance
GET /igdevicedesc.xml HTTP/1.1\r\n
doesn't show any relevance?
 
that's one http request..
when you go to a website that may spawn many http requests
including an xml file
you just got the wrong http request there
maybe there is a way you can search for GET /index[whatever]
maybe you can export the data and search it
so you find the GET requests that are relevant to you
 
3:30 PM
But I shall mention that, those data I captured them after visiting facebook
 
so?
if it is from the facebook IP then it would be
and websites can stay open and refresh and so on
 
Maybe facobook uses https which cannot be grabbed by Wireshark?
GET /tutorials.html HTTP/1.1
@barlop I visited this website cppforschool.com/tutorials.html
Host: www.cppforschool.com\r\n
 
I suggest testing a simple example like HTTP web server then flick the web server to HTTPS..
there are some simple web servers that may do https..
i can't remember the names.. brs webweaver might not do https..
nowadays people sometimes use things like python for a simple web server
like it is literaiiy a simple python command and a web server is set up
 
3:52 PM
oh no
 
some kind of spy software could get http requests by taking screenshots
or maybe a web browser extension could record it
 
one told me I need to install certifications and change some settings on wireshark
 
2
Q: Does wireshark can capture https request?

toastmasterI have been working in wireshark. And I can able to capture the http request and capturing http packets using wireshark. And now I am capturing the https request. It seems does not capture the packets and when I right click-> follow-->tcp stream It shows the unreadable characters. Does wireshark ...

 
to be able to capture these HTTPS
 
looks like a bit of a project!
 
3:57 PM
you need to hack an entire website to get private key for that https?
lol
 
hehehe
no idea
looks complicated
 
Why fiddler could do it
 
yeah something like that
 
it captures https but locally
 
would be easier
essentially the concept is that it's the software making the request that can decrypt it
eg a web browser extension perhaps.
or an application that makes a request
 
4:00 PM
Wireshark doesn't make requests!
 
right, it doesn't make the requests, that's why it can't decrypt the https.
unless perhaps wireshark hacked a local web browser! or unless a web browser had an option to send the encryption key to some other software
 
4:16 PM
which web browser?
I mean my browser or the one on the network?
 
4:33 PM
@barlop I am reading this tutorial russell.ballestrini.net/…
I used Wireshark to capture that website linkpeek.com
I found myself able to see the URL
From the "Client Hello"
of length 571
I wonder what other lengths represent?
such as 613 indicated Server Name: maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com
which is irrelevant to linkpeek.com
 
@Student404Mus This chat is not really the place to give you tutorials. If you have a specific question please ask it on the main site.
 
@DavidPostill this is not a tutorial. This is a QUESTION!
 
@Student404Mus Which has become a long conversation. Like I said that is not what chat is for. Questions belong on the main site.
You started with "How to capture URL's from Wireshark?". That should have been asked on the main site.
 
Okay. We started our chat about one question. after discussions I came into another question. I don't see what's the problem with asking in chat rooms!
And we know that some answers on the main website don't give satisfactory as it would do when in full conversation
 
5:23 PM
@Student404Mus We can help with certain issues in the chat room, but we prefer troubleshooting to be left to the main site
 
 
6 hours later…
11:25 PM
@Student404Mus that article russell.ballestrini.net/… gets nowhere, it just ends with him capturing some encrypted SSL stuff. It's not a good article
@Student404Mus If you run into any solutions that you can do a QnA to, then post a question and post your own answer
it seems like you say you visited a URL linkpeek.com and managed to get a packet showing one of the domains that it made a request to (bootstrap is a common javascript framework used by websites so many websites download bootstrap as part of their loading)... but it sounds like you didn't manage to see a packet showing the visiting of linkpeek.com itself, right?
I can only give little suggestions 'cos i've no idea.. and even the serverfault.com people didn't seem to know much and they are often very technical on sysadmin and network admin stuff.
your odds of success of getting much in wireshark are low if they can't.. and you have done well to find anything.
 

« first day (3536 days earlier)      last day (1474 days later) »