« first day (275 days earlier)      last day (944 days later) » 

3:41 PM
New project : Define $$f(n):=\prod_{j=1}^n F_j$$ where $F_j$ denotes the $j$-th Fibonacci-number. $f(n)-1$ is prime for $n=4,5,6,7,8,14,15$ and $f(n)+1$ is prime for $n=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,22,28$. Are there more primes of the form $f(n)\pm1$ ?
 
3:53 PM
@MartinHopf
@TeresaLisbon
 
@Peter Nice! This one seems to be interesting, till where have you checked both hypotheses?
 
4:07 PM
The "-" case and the "+" - case. Unfortunately, we can only use PARI/GP for this calculation , unless someone knows a trick.
 
4:19 PM
@Peter I'm sorry I wasn't clear, I meant : till what $n$ did you check the primality of $f(n)-1$ and $f(n)+1$?
 
The current program is at $n=360$, but with pre-sieving I will be able to get a better speed. But I like doublechecks...
 
Ok, $n=360$ is very large, we should check if there's like a list of primes common among a certain bunch of multiples . For example , is there a predictable sequence of $n$ for which $f(n)+1$ or $f(n)-1$ is a multiple of $3/5/7$ etc.
We can then start ruling out all such $n$. Hopefully there will be some modulo pattern to help us.
 
Rather the opposite holds. Every prime factor of a fibonacci-number upto $F_n$ CANNOT be a prime factor of either $f(n)-1$ or $f(n)+1$. So, we have many candidates.
But the sequence $f(n)$ grows of course very quickly. Hence it can take a while to get the next PRP.
 
Oh, I see. Oh dear, this is a problem.
The lack of predictability means that we'll have to check every value of n, unfortunately.
 
To be more precise : Presieving will not remove many candidates, but some gain of speed might be possible. Maybe , PFGW allows to eveluate products , factordb seems not to support it.
Maybe, someone in the mersenne forum knows a syntax for PFGW.
I do not think that there is a closed form expression readable by factordb or PFGW, right ?
 
4:33 PM
No, I don't think so.
It's quite an abstract expression that we are dealing with right now.
 
If you are patient enough to input long strings as I(1)*I(2)*...*I(500) , you can in principle use factordb.
 
Yes, you can create a program to generate such strings for you, which you can then copy-paste into factordb.
 
and then delete one factor by another beginning with the longest. Would you be patient enough for this job ?
 
Sure, why not? Let me know what exactly to print out, I can get it done and let you know how it's done.
I mean to say : I'll create the program and find you an online IDE where you can run it get the output and put it into factordb. Python will do the string-generation very easily.
 
To save time and to avoid typos, I can try to write a program creating the desired string.
 
4:37 PM
If you can do it, that would be great as well. Let me know what I need to do for assistance.
 
This seems to do the job :
k=200;a="";for(s=1,k,a=concat(a,"I(");a=concat(a,Str(s));a=concat(a,")");if(s<k,a=concat(a,"*")));print(a)
 
Yes, this looks like it does the job as well! In fact ,this is really nice and self-contained.
 
start with $n = 1\ 000$
I am at $n=409$
We will see whether factordb can handle such long string at all.
 
4:54 PM
Ok
By the way, I need to leave, so you can leave the results here and I will definitely take a look at them tomorrow. Meanwhile, my thread will be free tomorrow so I'll be able to work with yafu and LLR if required. Thanks.
 
gp > prod(j=1,1000,fibonacci(j))*1.0
%4 = 8.2736317040854404918072068971838230962 E104248
gp >
 

« first day (275 days earlier)      last day (944 days later) »