@Ray I just used what I learned from our recent massive talks that concluded good questions being their focus and being answerable with reference-able doctrines. If we can turn around an question that was -7 and community closed/commented as not even being a question at all by applying a little dose of our own medicine, I think it our case for setting those as reasonable quality guidelines will be strengthened.
Not to rehash these questions:
Should history questions be on topic?
What are the limits on history/historical questions?
Are questions on what Christians have done in history on-topic?
But in refocusing to be Christian-Doctrine-and-Biblical-Basis.SE have we ignored the limits we previously s...
In response to Can we reverse the trend on low quality posts? we would like to propose the following thoughts on what defines a good focused question.
The primary focus of this site is a place to ask questions about Christianity. We have identified a couple of key aspects of constructive questi...
First, this question makes two assumptions:
For a person to be saved today, they must hear the gospel of Jesus Christ, and accept the gift of His death on the cross as penance for their sin.
Before the death of Christ, the requirement for salvation was faith in God's future redemptive work (See...
@mods do you think this deleted question of mine could be salvageable by refocusing it like I've tried to do? I still feel it had good answers and it's a pity they're deleted.
In response to Can we reverse the trend on low quality posts? we would like to propose the following thoughts on what defines a good supported answer.
In order to give a valid answer about Christianity, it will almost always be necessary to reference a specific doctrine, biblical passage, or oth...
There's a problem with one of your assumptions: Jehovah's Witnesses don't use Jehovah "to be accurate". They use Jehovah because they think it's important to call God by name, and because Jehovah is the traditional rendering in English. They accept that the original pronunciation has been lost, a...
@waxeagle Look, I didn't go looking for that image, though I had seen it before. It popped up where I was reading somewhere else, and I popped it in here. It's short, and to the point, and I threw it in.
In other words, it's not something I feel strongly about. If you want it got rid of, I'll do it.
@TRiG better to take it down. I don't care (in fact personally I'm rather amused by it) but I've gotta put the mod hat on and say its not appropriate here.
Not to rehash these questions:
Should history questions be on topic?
What are the limits on history/historical questions?
Are questions on what Christians have done in history on-topic?
But in refocusing to be Christian-Doctrine-and-Biblical-Basis.SE have we ignored the limits we previously s...
In response to Can we reverse the trend on low quality posts? we would like to propose the following thoughts on what defines a good focused question.
The primary focus of this site is a place to ask questions about Christianity. We have identified a couple of key aspects of constructive questi...
The Upper Room
The Upper Room