Matched by the following: voip(?<=[/?&]voip)[\W_]*+phone on line 41925 of watched_keywords.txt theglobalreviews\.com on line 42012 of watched_keywords.txt
Do I have @Makyen to thank for the [relatively] new feature of SIM that allows me to report a post without having to come here and type in !!/report? It's awesome; I love it. (Update: Yes, yes, I do.)
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SmokeDetector This is at least NAA. The blog post was "updated" about 10 days ago and there are no other hits for the domain on SE. So, affiliation is fairly likely.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (45): Dumpstech is the best platform, by dumpstech on superuser.com (@Ollie)
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SmokeDetector The question is asking for libraries, which is what the answer provides. The answer author doesn't appear to be the maintainer of the library.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
teward/Osiris: In getting MS post information, recovered from `requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /api/v2.0/posts/urls?key=[METASMOKE KEY REDACTED]&filter=GHOOIJGNLKHIIOIKGILKIJGHFMNKKGFJ&urls=%2F%2Fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2F234234%2Fcan-a-criminal-country-exist-in-the-modern-world-without-getting-blockaded-and (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.Verifi edHTTPSConnection object at 0x7f0e133e8670>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -3] Temporary fa…
@CodyGray Because SD looks at the HTML, as provided by SE, rather than the Markdown. For that post, SE stripped the link in the Markdown➞HTML process, due to the raw HTML <a> provided in the Markdown text using attributes where aren't permitted by SE. It would be good for SD to also look in the Markdown, but it doesn't do so at this time.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SmokeDetector Looks like it could be an off-topic question, but linked image seems completely unrelated to anything, and the user has history of at least one other nonsense post.
@CodyGray You appear to be wondering about the "contact" and "visit" watches. Those have been active for about 10 days. Both require that the word be near a link or something that looks domain-like and not be in code. While they are both detecting a substantial number of FP posts, they both have detected a couple/few TP posts which we would not have otherwise detected. At the moment, they are primarily collecting data. They both will need to be refined in order to reduce the number of FP, or we will need to remove them and detect the TP posts they detected in some other way.
cc @cigien, as you've been watching these too.
Feel free to bug me about them, as they are likely to continue to produce a substantial number of FP if not refined and/or removed.
@SmokeDetector Personally, I consider posting something like this a bit rude, as it's obviously useless for anyone who doesn't know the answer to post an answer saying they don't know. Just think what the sites would be like if everyone who visited a question did that on every question. It's also quite annoying from the question asker's point of view for someone to post something like that, as it's just a complete waste of their time.
