Why have my answers to these questions been marked as spam or offensive, despite being technically valid and tested?
How to make reflection work on JDK 16 and later?
In Java 17 how do I avoid resorting to --add-opens?
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@JeffSchaller It appears to be this. I don't recall coming across this before, but it appears SD caught the other reasons, and reported it, so MS didn't have that domain as a detection reason. (A search on MS for that domain would yield it though). Anyway, I've added the domain manually to that MS record now.
Hmm, actually MS search is not finding it (even with the domain having been added), so I've either misunderstood something, or did something incorrectly, or both.
@JeffSchaller @cigien The domains only existed in the Markdown, due to Markdown being malformed (Markdown for links were put in code format), which resulted in the links being stripped by SE. SD only tests against the HTML, not the Markdown. Thus, SD didn't see the domains. IIRC, MS also only looks for domains in the HTML, not the Markdown. additional brief comment regarding testing against HTML vs. Markdown vs. both
That doesn't mean it wouldn't be beneficial for SD to run some of its detections against the Markdown too. For example, most of the blacklisted websites could reasonably be run against the Markdown with a detection generated for the Markdown, if some item is detected in the Markdown but not the HTML. That is, however, not the case for a substantial number of detections as they currently are (i.e. it's not something we can just implement across the board).
@Makyen Thanks for the explanation. I see that it's expensive to do the search by default, but is there any way to force MS to search domains in the Markdown as well? e.g. this search doesn't find at least one post with that domain, so we're clearly undercounting the hits in some cases.
@SmokeDetector The Google translation here doesn't show up as R/A or spam. However, in combination with their previously reported answer, which while littered with offensive language user for emphasis, also isn't directly R/A, it appears the user is trolling.
@SmokeDetector While this is littered with offensive language used for emphasis, Google translate doesn't show as directly R/A. It appears very disconnected from the question. In combination with their other reported answer on the same question, it appears the user is trolling. Note: the wording makes me suspect that they are plagiarized either in non-English form or plagiarized from an English source and translated. However, I didn't find a source.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, mostly non-latin answer, mostly punctuation marks in answer (172): Собачьи команды ✏️ by Виола on rus.SE
Why have my answers to these questions been marked as spam or offensive, despite being technically valid and tested?
How to make reflection work on JDK 16 and later?
In Java 17 how do I avoid resorting to --add-opens?
