@SmokeDetector It's spam, but a moderator commented around the first time it was detected and clearly felt it was OK. I've submitted an edit to remove the clearly promotional part of the answer. The user is unregistered, so we can hope the edit is approved and the user has lost the cookies needed to access the account.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@Vega I've added you to the privilege list for SmokeDetector (SD) here in Charcoal HQ. You should run the !!/amiprivileged command to verify. It would be a good idea to read through the Feedback Guidance, SmokeDetector wiki, and SmokeDetector commands (in particular feedback).
If you haven't already read it, there's an Introduction to Participating in Charcoal. (You already know this, but it's sometimes helpful to have all this information in one place.)
You may also want to look at the userscripts we have available (GitHub), as they can be quite helpful, depending on how you want to participate. For viewing, feedback, and flagging in chat, I find FIRE and AIM to be the ones I use the most.
For flagging through the userscripts, your metasmoke account needs to be write authenticated with SE, which, if you haven't already done so, can be done from the authentication page and doesn't require you to also sign up for autoflagging, although authenticating is also a required step for signing up for autoflagging.
In addition, to enable manual flagging through the userscripts, the checkbox that says "Allow metasmoke to raise flags for my account" on this page also needs to be checked. If you have no entries in the "ID Site Count Flags Used Today" list at the bottom of that page, then autoflagging will still not be enabled, but manual flagging through the userscripts will be enabled.
Just so you know, we normally tell people when they are getting privileges that we practice the "ton of bricks" discipline method here: If you mess-up sufficiently, or consistently, we come down like a ton of bricks :-).
To quote ArtOfCode: "TL;DR: ton-of-bricks is mostly to say that we almost never need to enforce things because things enforce themselves through having a good community here. If it gets to the point that someone's enforcing something, something's gone badly wrong."
Quoting NobodyNada [with a bit added]: "Note that 'mess up' doesn't mean 'make a mistake', it means 'do something intentionally irresponsible/antagonistic' [or consistently do something wrong and not change when it's, repeatedly, pointed out]. Charcoalers are generally quite friendly, forgiving of mistakes, and willing to help each other learn. We recognize that our systems and policies have quite the learning curve -- so don't be afraid of us :)"
@SmokeDetector TPU voters please review, machine translation looks to me like an honest attempt to discuss a news article about eye health issues related to children's use of mobile devices
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@CodyGray The regex contains an unescaped ".", which should be "\." in most cases. Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@CodyGray That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
halflife:2021-06-22 12:24:38,773:https://bit.ly/3j3hyvk redirects to https://mobisoftinfotech.com/resources/blog/complete-guide-to-remote-team-hiring/?utm_source=organic&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=answer_web
