@cigien Matched by (?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten)\b(?!.{0,25}three\W++four\W++five\W++six\W++seven\W++eight\W++nine)(?:\W++(?:p\W++)*+(?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten)){8,}+(?!(?:[^<]|<(?!\/?code>))*+<\/code>) on line 24090 of watched_keywords.txt
I tried searching on MS, but it's taking ages. I'm not sure if that's because this is an expensive search, or MS is just acting up. Other searches seem fine.
I would have expected it to catch 10 of those words if it's a phone number, not 9. Also why doesn't it catch zero, one, or two anywhere but for the first digit?
@RyanM Matched by (?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten)\b(?!.{0,25}three\W++four\W++five\W++six\W++seven\W++eight\W++nine)(?:\W++(?:p\W++)*+(?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|six|seven|eight|nine|ten)){8,}+(?!(?:[^<]|<(?!\/?code>))*+<\/code>) on line 24090 of watched_keywords.txt
@SmokeDetector Odd. Account is 7 months old, and they suddenly posted 3 answers (one on SO, one on Android, and one on SU) promoting AceThinker. Probably spam, based on the style of many of the other hits for this product.
@Cerbrus In case no one replied to this: I'm not sure what you mean by Meta SO mod, did you want that post to be reported to Smoke Detector? In general, you can just raise a custom flag and it'll get handled.
@SmokeDetector fp- "As a database, does TcaplusDB support data elimination? LRU (least recently used) is to eliminate the least recently accessed data. In fact, LRU is the data that has been used recently, so the probability of being accessed in the future is also high. If the LRU is too low, data may occur. Elimination, then, does TcaplusDB support data elimination?"
@SmokeDetector The OP's username, combined with the low number of Google hits for "TcaplusDB" makes me suspicious that this actually is spam, but that the spammer just failed to include a URL or contact info. However, that doesn't change the fact that we should assume good faith. There's just not enough information available to say this is spam.
@RyanM That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (46): Mobil sohbet Uygulamaları by Radyo Sohbet on stackoverflow.com
@Yatin That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
