@NisseEngström Raising a custom mod-flag is very helpful. Please make it a priority when you make a report like this for posts that are not obviously spam.
@Makyen In case you didn't find it already, they link github.com/talkforweb/TalkforWEB-Review-Plugin in a comment, which matches their first name (based on the links in their profile) and shows that person having a talkforweb email address.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
is that tp? kinda leaning toward it, given Cody's inclusion of minimum-length evasion as abuse...but on the fence, as it's otherwise a coherent-but-off-topic question.
That said I'm not wondering just because it's off-topic: if it didn't have "PPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSEEEE AAAAAANNNNNNNNNSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRR" I would not consider flagging it (and I did not flag it)
@RyanM It's a Teams post explaining in more detail my POV on this sort of post and asking if we can clarify our feedback guidance. You can join Teams by going to metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/channels/email
@SmokeDetector FWIW I just mod deleted. The base question isn't useful at all, and the added noise made it worse
I'm not sure how Charcoal overall wants to handle it, but I tend to err on the side of getting that gone as quickly as possible, which is what Shog9 said
