Huh. The tps are strong tps, but the fps are just people who happened to find content on their site
It probably shouldn't be blacklisted, just because of how many fps there are
Hm, so that domain really only has two fps, as Smokey caught edits, and the naa posts should have been changed to tp after the posting pattern was recognized.
Probably still shouldn't be blacklisted, but it shouldn't be marked #notspam-provisional, either
Also, are people noticing the domain tagging area being a bit wonky? What I see
@Das_Geek That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (295): BEST Male Formula by joanjoan147 on askubuntu.com
I think for the first, the X axis is "seconds taken to delete" and the Y axis is "number of posts deleted at this speed", with the dotted line representing the average
But I have no idea what the second graph is illustrating, because its Y axis is in the hundreds and ranges up to almost a thousand, and therefore it is definitely not describing, say, average TTD on that day.
... should I start an issue on the github requesting some X and Y axis labels?
@Glorfindel and @Das_Geek you both rated this post as spam; I considered it a link-only NAA. Could you shed any light on why you consider it spam vs NAA?
The X axis on the first graph may also be hour GMT with the dotted line representing now, the Y axis bar is some kind of TTD metric (average? max? who knows) corresponding to that hour. I'm definitely opening an issue.
@JeffSchaller I had thought the fact that the video was posted recently and the username was a copy of the video's title was suspicious, and I saw there was already a tp feedback so I cast my vote that way, as well. I was on the fence either way, but if you think it's naa then I'll change my feedback
@SmokeDetector And the username is similar to one of the URLs
@Das_Geek the username was one factor towards "spam" in my opinion, but I wasn't sure if the youtube link contained "enough" to tip the scales here. I didn't watch the video, but generally consider link-only answers to be NAA unless they're clearly spam/selling something
@JeffSchaller Yep, I didn't watch the video either. In retrospect I probably shouldn't have cast my vote that way as there really wasn't enough positive evidence that there was some affiliation
first time I've seen it! :) I reached out to the other mods on my team for a second pair of eyes, but given this, I think I'll clear the flag on my own.
@SmokeDetector fp- Their post has "enough" to kinda-sorta say they're disclosing their affiliation, and the post is asking for recommendations/software
@Das_Geek That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
