Earlier I saw this answer in the Low Quality review queue (it is now deleted so the review queue page I saw the answer in is the only way I can see it). I immediately identified it as spam, went to the original post and flagged it as such.
To my surprise a short while later my flag had been disp...
!!/report sqa.stackexchange.com/a/38260 "Appears to be intended as an additional promotion of the linked site. It's also plagiarized from the page that's linked in the post."
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen An invalid pattern was provided, please check your command.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ip for hostname in answer and Bad ip for hostname in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ip for hostname in answer and Bad ip for hostname in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 0-16: codeultimate.com Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 0-16: codeultimate.com Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 0-16: codeultimate.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +7 more (791): health-body.org/keto-life/ by Goictived1957 on askubuntu.com
@SmokeDetector This type of answer ("me too, please help") has generally been considered NAA. OTOH, I don't have a problem with it being blocked by a system level block. However, I'm not sure it's appropriate for us to be autoflagging it, even though it is a form of spam.
