@Rob NAA could work on-site, and clearly someone already flagged them as such (note comments "from review"). I'm a little hesitant at flagging R/A on-site, as it's not clear in isolation that they are abusing the system, although, IMO, they clearly are intentionally doing so (even if they are doing what you say). A custom mod-flag might be more appropriate, as that allows you to explain.
Yes, it's been 4 hours and they've not followed up with additional pearls of wisdom. If the next line is "use dictionary!" that would just cross the line (though written politely, it's combined with nuisance behavior). I think my feedback here would be "naa-" but I'll wait until I'm fully awake before affecting our stats.
For feedback here, I'm comfortable with this being blocked on a system level, so TP. I don't really see any question on which that content would be valid, particularly with the obvious effort to get around the minimum length filter.
Ah, ML filter ... They were caught by their other error which we won't discuss. By all means feedback as you feel best. I'll abstain until I'm awake. :)
@SmokeDetector naa- The person replying (John) has posted a "me too" which describes having to use an umbrella while sitting on the toilet. Not going to mark it as offensive (rude) but it's NAA.
@iBug the report on user "Amy G. Taylor on apple.SE" {MS} shown 3 blocks above has her blacklisted for a previous post that was spammy enough but the current post isn't sufficiently spammy - so should be "fp-" - but it's about the same software, with no links this time, (so it's sort-of promotional). Marking it "fp-" removes the blacklisting (which I don't want) but marking it "spam" is too strong. Question: Should it simply be
@Rob I'm uncertain about the post. I've read it and it looks like it's intended as a spam seed, but that's not clear. I've custom mod-flagged giving them a heads-up. I've also scheduled a revisit for myself to the question in 24 hours to check for an edit or answer that makes it more clear if it's a poor question, or really just a spam seed.
If I was giving feedback now, I'd probably mark it as fp, as it's not clear to me that there should be a system level block. After giving that feedback, I'd probably add the user back on the blacklist with !!/addblu, as I'd still like to see their next post.
I saw fonedog.com on their previous post (for which they're blacklisted) and FoneDog on the post you're wondering about, that's pretty much a strong signal to me.
Well, I think we have two votes for "spam" but I do appreciate you taking the time to look and offering your advice Makyen. It's very much a seed as it obligates the answerer (and they might answer their own question) to use the software or be knowledgeable about it and explain how they can (easily) use it to accomplish the task.
@SmokeDetector spam
50 minutes, no answers, but no downvotes either - masterful.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +2 more (593): Increase the testosterone production by nancympace on arduino.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +6 more (794): nutritionless.com/melaluna/ by gjleufiv on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +5 more (790): nutritionless.com/melaluna/ by schwulst on drupal.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +5 more (790): pilpedia.com/keto-blast/ by tanina on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +1 more (495): Enhances your performance at the gym by nancympace on askubuntu.com
@Undo or @ArtOfCode - Error: "MySQL client is not connected" --- "Extracted source (around line #19): inst = find_by name: key" in file: Rails.root: /var/railsapps/metasmoke/releases/20190108140950
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +6 more (890): pilpedia.com/keto-blast/ by ailte201 on askubuntu.com
The prior "Client not connected" error was correct when reported (otherwise I wouldn't have an error message to quote). Though it seems to have fixed itself. Good night. Someone else can look if it reoccurs.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching website in body (293): usasupplementguide by RobinRuskin on wordpress.SE
@iBug That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in username, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body (486): Mira essence cream canada by lumineri skin on meta.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching website in body, +5 more (692): nutritionless.com/melaluna/ by sazifjodk on wordpress.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +2 more (591): Patriot Power Greens by moner201 on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link following arrow in body, +1 more (590): maleintalk.com/purebiome-30/ by yolandakamp on apple.SE
@bertieb That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching product name in title, +3 more (592): Keto Weight Loss Plus South Africa by user987228 on superuser.com
@Rob Hi Rob, thanks for the ping sorry for the delay. The custom flag from Makyen was really helpful as another moderator handled the post based on that. fp but addblu would likely be the least controversial, but I would also agree tpu is appropriate since that question reads almost exactly like many spam seed questions we've had in the past, even ignoring this user's history.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (491): getmagnetiques.com/trialix-ca/ by Hist reas on ham.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +3 more (589): getmagnetiques.com/trialix-ca/ by fafabox on wordpress.SE
@Zoe Reason #1, or more applicable reason #2 - there's a FAQ on Meta titled Roomba which supports you asking your question. You could ask on Meta about the particular question and probably receive the correct answer shortly thereafter.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (587): Angeletta Skin Cream Buy That Best by ReyesHaughh on stackoverflow.com
@iBug, @tripleee, @CalvT, @EriktheOutgolfer - Regarding our conversation the other day about detecting "Grace Period Edits" I've been reading the Stack Exchange API v2.2 - Section: Throttles and there are problems with repeating the request: would it be abusive if it's too frequent and the "heavy caching" of "semantically identical requests more than once a minute." --- But there seems to be a trick:
Duplicate Requests where we can use a request_id parameter along with every request, slightly longer than once per minute - that ought to reply with a duplicate_request error.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, blacklisted user (316): Where can we buy app installs by roni alax on gamedev.SE
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer, Potentially bad keyword in answer, Potentially problematic ns configuration in body, and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
Is there any way to find the edit history of a user profile? I think this user's profile said "Employee at Carbon Teq" a few minutes ago, but I may have been confused.
