@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in answer and Blacklisted website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector While I agree that it's reasonable to system-level block this content, it's just a "thank you" answer, which should be NAA, not autoflaged into oblivion.
@ThomasWard Something like that might be useful (I'd have search on MS to see what it matches), but that regex itself is quite broad. If you are looking for just subdomains, I'd suggest something that detects just things that look like subdomains. That regex will detect anything that has "recover" followed by a sentence that ends with "email." and has another sentence. Maybe something like recover[a-z0-9-]*email[a-z0-9-]*(?:\.[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*)*(?:\.[a-z]+) (needs testing; 2 matches on MS).
^ It reports Gaurav's old answer because the Q&A was bumped by thespacecamel's new VLQ answer which isn't caught as "very short, link at end". @Makyen is there a rule that ought to have fired and did not - it's FP'd and missed a TP? --- afk 1/2 hour, no rush for investigating or answer. Thanks.
@SmokeDetector This is spam. I custom mod flagged: This question is plagiarized from this Stack Overflow question with a spam link added. The domain linked here has a long history of spam, with at least some other instances of plagiarism and adding a spam link.
rather than just a 'subdomain' capture. The idea is that we'd be able to detect both Subdomains like that you blacklisted and domains themselves matching the pattern. But was more a fifteen-seconds-to-hash-together than anything else :p
@Makyen well, the issue is more with FIRE, AIM just shows the reason weight an extra time at the bottom-left of the message in the same font as the message text... wait a sec to check if there are Chrome updates
and yes, I've tried reloading
no Chrome updates
I'll post a screenshot
@Makyen ^
that's when I hover; when I don't, the username disappears as well
@EriktheOutgolfer Yes, they should. There are a variety of subdomains which should be excluded from most SE userscripts. If it's only for viewing your sandbox, then it should only load on that specific page.
@SmokeDetector Still alive [ MS ]. It was closed by a moderator, probably not realizing it was plagiarized with a spam link added. Interestingly, the spam link was added 2 days after the plagiarized question was posted.
@ThomasWard Yeah, I spent a bit more, but we can always (well, OK, usually) get to a regex that does what's desired. I assume that you also desire to catch the .email TLD.
Are you wanting to catch the entire .email TLD, or only if it has "recover" in a subdomain? I was assuming that you wanted "recover" in there somewhere.
@ArtOfCode @Undo I'm interested in running an SD instance. I've spun up an EC2 instance and run through what's in this setup info. I'm at the point of editing the "config" file, but I need information as to the appropriate entries in that file for a normal SD instance. I'm assuming that should be communicated on keybase.
@Makyen Your assumption is correct. I added you to the charcoal team on Keybase - if you look in the files for that team, you'll find example config and credentials.
@ThomasWard - Probably / Maybe because MS was running but went astoyle on the graphs and what was working wasn't exactly in agreement, or the times were loose.
@EriktheOutgolfer That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching email in body and Pattern-matching email in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Undo thought: what driver is ActionCable using? IIRC, one of 'em is redis... which might be causing some of this weirdness, now that it's on another host.
Looking at SDS, websocket messages for new pings are coming through 30s after they actually happen, which is odd
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching website in title, potentially bad ns for domain in title (395): www.supplementsforfitness.com/tevida/ by tandi1 on workplace.SE
Do we have an architecture diagram of what is running where and how each piece communicates with the others? If so, link please? If not, could we make one? It'd help a ton with troubleshooting.
@ArtOfCode Since their software isn't open source we will never know, but one day I had to guess a fraction of how things work to formulate a question that took several hours to troubleshoot: Reputation hung up in the Aggregator.
In today's review I ran across two answers by the same user that I was unsure if it was appropriate to flag as spam. The answers seem to be useful to me. For me the two posts are edge cases. Would a flag be appropriate or would a comment have been enough?
In today's review I ran across two answers by the same user that I was unsure if it was appropriate to flag as spam. The answers seem to be useful to me. For me the two posts are edge cases. Would a flag be appropriate or would a comment have been enough?
