[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, +3 more (592): what is Revive Keto by johnty on askubuntu.com
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (261): Sell or keep rental Property? by Blake on money.SE
@ArtOfCode Big WTF on my branch, I'd love for you to look. When we load from redis, the query time reported by rails is 3 times longer than when we load from a db. There's no way this is possible, and I'm 90% sure rails doesn't count redis time in DB time because we manage the redis connection object ourselves.
@ArtOfCode I find the MS reviews annoying for the same reason as I find the SE ones, they load too slowly because the transatlantic ping for me. I liked the system way better when it was first introduced, when all posts were just on 1 page, so I could directly switch to the next once my mind decided to press the button, and not 0.5 seconds after the button got pressed
@ArtOfCode With some hacks, I managed to get that speed back, but I'm currently doing something kinda sketchy: 1) Never expiring these cached posts and 2) Assuming that the last 100 posts in redis are the last 100 posts. How do we feel about that?
Also, an interesting possibility that this brings up is using something like RediSearch for search.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
Still alive [ MS ]. A user has edited it to remove the spam, just leaving a comment that it was spam. I've left a comment elsewhere asking that user not to edit spam.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body, Potentially bad keyword in body, Potentially bad keyword in answer, and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector This is just spam. The linked site has nothing to do with courses. It's just a loan company. This user also posted this spam question linking to the same site.
@SmokeDetector Maybe undisclosed affiliation: a user with a similar name has committed to the linked project & this user was created today and has only posted this answer. Custom mod-flagged suggesting asking for disclosure.
@Makyen This is another example of something that never should have made it onto the blacklist. It never qualified under our guidelines (it had only 3 TP). After being put on the blacklist, it never had a TP again. It was also was significantly to general to be a good blacklist item. We should be significantly more proactive in removing things from the blacklist when they get an FP.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector Could someone that can see deleted posts on MSE take a look at this one? Was it deleted as spam by community? Deleted by a moderator? The user is deleted/destroyed, so I'm just wondering if there are indications that a moderator found more than is obvious from the record we have here.
@SmokeDetector It's not clear to me if it was intentional, but "no" is actually an answer to this question. Obviously, not a good answer, but an answer. The extra characters to fill out the length requirement don't help to improve the quality. In fact, the other answer, provided by an SE employee, is basically "no", but with significantly better explanation.
