@EriktheOutgolfer That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
looks like Aptoide is being faked and the fake ones are spammed (cc @tripleee) real website is aptoide.com so other domains are good to watch if they show up claiming relationship with Aptoide.
@thesecretmaster Not art, but I was there when they were implemented. Back when there was no FIRE and AIM, there was just a new userscript that allowed people to feedback when they flagged a post automatically
This had the purpose of minimizing extra effort. However, since there was no AIM, there was nothing on that post to see that it already had been fed back on, so this message was implemented to indicate that someone had already fed back on a post, letting people in chat know they didn't need to anymore
@NisseEngström The answer appears identical to a portion of this section of the page you linked. It's not clear to me if the answer is the copy, or the content of the linked page is the copy. Given that the SO answer was added to over a short time, I'm inclined to think the answer is the original.
@NisseEngström np. Yeah, I noticed the suspension. Obviously, it's not clear why. It's still certainly possible that the answer is not the original, but without exact dates on the page you found, there's really no way to be sure. Even then, dates on something like that could be inaccurate.
This discussion was from mid-april, I bought the Crucial MX500 a few weeks later for a little over $220 and now it costs $140. (The 2TB MX500 costs the same as the Micron 1100 did back then - and it was a really nice price)
This chart pretty much sums up what I'm saying (Crucial MX500 - 1TB)
@Cthulhu Moving from an HDD to an SSD is one of the upgrades that I recommend for basically anyone. It should make a definite human-noticeable difference in performance.
> If a post is edited by the author in a way which is mostly offensive, then the appropriate feedback is tp- as we would’ve wanted that edit to be blocked by the system.
I suppose I could have used the 'flag' link rather than AF link - because I just realized I recently turned off the option to "watch for manual flags" for reasaons similar to this.
FWIW I would say it's nukeable R/A only because it doesn't have any answers. It is certainly is R/A - but if it had answers I'd feel completely different about it (he really just needs to delete it if he doesn't want it)
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ns for domain in answer and Bad ns for domain in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Cthulhu That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
