{'e': 0, 'f': 1, 'o': 2, 'r': 3, 't': 4, 'l': 5, 's': 6, 'd': 7, '.': 8, 'c': 9, 'm': 10, 'w': 11, 'n': 12, 'a': 13, '-': 14, 'i': 15, '"': 16, 'I': 17, 'S': 18, 'v': 19, 'u': 20, 'p': 21, 'b': 22, 'g': 23, 'h': 24, 'j': 25, 'k': 26, 'y': 27, 'z': 28, '3': 29, '4': 30, 'x': 31, '1': 32, '0': 33, 'q': 34, '2': 35, '7': 36, '8': 37, 'C': 38, 'P': 39, '6': 40, '5': 41, '(': 42, ')': 43, 'T': 44, 'A': 45, 'J': 46, '9': 47, 'B': 48, ' ': 49, 'M': 50, 'G': 51, 'X': 52, 'W': 53, 'E': 54, 'O': 55, 'R': 56, 'V': 57, 'N': 58, 'F': 59, 'L': 60, 'U': 61, 'H': 62, 'Y': 63, 'D': 64, 'K': 65, 'Z': 66, '>'…
I recently flagged this answer as spam
It's an ad for iPistis and (since that's not enough) doesn't disclose the author's obvious affiliation:
This flag was declined stating:
a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it
Is evidence looked for? If this isn't spam...
