@Undo Aren't we most interested in the total time the spam was live (i.e. from SE post time to SE delete time)? Both time's should rely only on clocks at SE. It's interesting to see how long between SE post time to MS detect and MS detect to (various other MS events) and then SE delete, but the main one is how long the spam was live overall (which is what we claim is improved by using SD).
In Circle of the Seedling you can use Wild Shape to turn into plants. If I am a Gas Spore and use Death Burst, assuming the target fails the save and eventually dies from the infection, are the resulting Gas Spores that grow from their corpse considered my character?
Small regression - the sanitize drops HTML tags, leaving only content. Before: <script>alert('foo')</script> is shown; after it only shows the inner content: alert('foo')
It's a scary proposition, but... the numbers say we could do it. There are some other things I'd want to change procedurally and technically, but I won't rule it out
We have a really, really, really good system. If I'd asked people three years ago whether 99.99% was good enough to automatically block posts, they'd say "heck yes"
Technically, there are no outstanding unsolved problems preventing us from going to 4, 5, or even 6. 4 and 5 are doable now outside of social issues, and I have plans for what we need to do to get 6 comfortably.
Anonymous
Rationally, I can understand that the system is good enough to autonuke. But I'm still hesitant about the idea of flipping the switch.
Also, rationally, I know that people wouldn't complain about SE autonuking posts on their side, and so we're in a better logical position, since our system is 100% open.
@NogShine You are not a privileged user. Please see the privileges wiki page for information on what privileges are and what is expected of privileged users.
oh I was wondering about the comment where quartata was saying "which pattern matched was too slow for Smokey but could be suitable for Halflife" ... I guess this means figure out which regex was responsible for a match?
> Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username ---------- Title - Position 1-17: vars-performance Body - Position 1-17: vars-performance Username - Position 1-17: vars-performance
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Title - Position 1-6: renux Body - Position 1-6: renux Username - Position 1-6: renux
@NogShine you have to link back to the message you respond to, or say "sd k" (prefer the former because that way you avoid a race condition if somebody else posts a message just before you hit enter)
but I guess you don't have the privileges yet ...?
