The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:28 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/697097?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=tex.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:43 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/32904?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=video.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:57 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/4776837?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=math.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:11 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/501948?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=electronics.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:25 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/1077612?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=askubuntu.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:39 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/373427?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=es.stackoverflow.com
@Jesse That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in body and Bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Nick That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword in link text in answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (172): How to use get/set methods? ✏️ by Kiaan sharma on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username, +1 more (104): Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) | BloomchemAG by Bloomchemag on meta.SE (@Ollie @Ethan)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +1 more (483): Farmers Garden CBD Gummies Reviews by Kevin Larsen on meta.SE (@Ollie @Ethan)
Hmm. I came across one of those "zuppio" posts a day or so ago in FA review. At that time, there were less ... but maybe I should have taken action earlier?
... But this time (also in FA) I acted!
10/10 posts advertising the same site is fairly clear-cut.
@JeffSchaller Matched by green[\W_]*+coffee(?:[\W_]*+(?:5k|diet|extract|bean(?!s\b)|max|grano(?!\.in(?<=greencoffeegrano\.in))|price|lean|cleanse|great|zt|essence|review|g3000|workouts|now|\d++|[\da-f]{5,}+)s?)+ on line 1647 of bad_keywords.txt
@SmokeDetector great news; the regex is 97.6% TP (287/7/0); unfortunately, the most recent posts account for all 7 FP, and the newest TP is 4+ years ago. don't look under rocks, folks :)
