@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body, Potentially bad keyword in answer, Blacklisted website in body, and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SmokeDetector I can't find any affiliation, and the linked article was posted a while ago. The user profile has been deleted/destroyed though, and no other hits for the domain on SE, so I'm watching it in case it shows up again.
@SmokeDetector Hmm, I'm not sure this is spam. The username is a bit fishy, but the link is to a site that has several fp across the network, and the question asks exactly for such an answer.
sdc report stackoverflow.com/a/73391302 "Looks like undisclosed affiliation: They have a profile on the PlasticSCM forum, and another one of their answers contains a support email exactly like the one in their posts on the linked forum. In addition, the answer is VLQ (link-only) and the usernames match. Custom flagged."
@SmokeDetector This is undisclosed affiliation, based on the site linked in the (now destroyed) user's profile. The unregistered user posted two answers which both linked to their site without disclosing affiliation.
@SmokeDetector This appears to be a real question. The described problem does occur on the page to which clicking the "Buy Product" button navigates. However, it's unclear/off-topic/no MCVE. So, while having the link is effectively promotional, it doesn't appear to be spam.
@JeffSchaller The regex contains an unescaped ".", which should be "\." in most cases. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Korean character in title, few unique characters in body, mostly non-latin body, mostly non-latin title, repeating characters in body, +1 more (477): ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ✏️ by Pawn on scifi.SE
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: no method found with this name at 18:20:10 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: no method found with this name at 18:20:26 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
teward/Osiris: In getting MS post information, recovered from `requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /api/v2.0/posts/urls?key=[METASMOKE KEY REDACTED]&filter=GHOOIJGNLKHIIOIKGILKIJGHFMNKKGFJ&urls=%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F73393280%2Fit-increases-a-persons-self-esteem (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x7ff4ea3bcdc0>: Failed to e stablish a new connection: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution'))`
sdc report stackoverflow.com/a/73393263/4657412 "I've custom flagged this. I don't have too much evidence for a link between the poster and the blog, but the articles are pretty new and it doesn't seem like a widely read blog"
teward/Osiris: In getting MS post information, recovered from `requests.exceptions.JSONDecodeError: [Errno Expecting value] <html><body><h1>503 Service Unavailable</h1> No server is available to handle this request. </body></html> : 0`
Makyen/EC2-linux received failover signal. <-- This probably shouldn't have happened. Check if Osiris is operational (e.g. !!/location) and consider executing !!/standby Makyen/EC2-linux to put this instance back in standby. (@Makyen)
@cocomac Thanks. I appreciate that. Getting someone to notice the failover and do exactly what you did is the intended result from having the additional text in the failover message.
[:61809074] <skipped> [:61809070] Registered answer as true positive, but could not get user from URL: `''` [:61809069] Registered answer as true positive, but could not get user from URL: `''` [:61809067] Registered answer as true positive, but could not get user from URL: `''` [:61809049] That message is not a report. [:61808961] Registered answer as true positive and blacklisted user.
@JeffSchaller A normalized version, {{'19089916649'}}, of that pattern is already on the number watchlist. You can use !!/bisect-number 1 ( 9 0 8 ) 9 9 1 ‑ 6 6 4 9 to determine which entries on the number lists match that pattern, which would tell you: Matched by +1 (908) 991‑6649 on line 2734 of watched_numbers.txt: 19089916649 found normalized; 9089916649 found normalized
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 0-35: h a c k l o r d j o d y @ g m a i l Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 0-35: h a c k l o r d j o d y @ g m a i l Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 0-35: h a c k l o r d j o d y @ g m a i l
