@forest That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SurajRao Use an "in need of moderator intervention" flag and explain, or at least mention you believe the user used ChatGPT. You don't need to give us a bunch of evidence. We're fairly familiar with content from ChatGPT.
@Ethan Probably. Mostly? If it looks like the post was, or the user's posts in general are, created by ChatGPT, then the moderator is quite likely to mark the flag as helpful.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in username, username similar to website in answer (166): Can some human groups evolve into new species? by Vapeciga on biology.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +2 more (174): Where to buy e-cigarettes? by Vapeciga on biology.SE
@HenryEcker Yeah, almost certainly. All their answers promote the same plugin, and the plugin has only been mentioned in one other place by a user with the same first name. I've custom flagged it.
@cigien I wasn't sure if it was a reasonable solution (and someone over excited spreading the solution which happens on occasion), or if it was promotional. Thank you for digging a bit (and also for flagging it).
The Fire-additional-functionality just stopped working for me today. I deleted and reinstalled it, but no luck. FIRE, and all other userscripts I have are working fine. Anyone else having this issue, or know how to fix it? cc @Spevacus?
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:17:43 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:17:58 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:18:12 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:18:26 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:18:40 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 08:18:55 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (102): Omegle Alternatives by yuyyu app on meta.SE (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (46): Why Choose CloudIBN by cloudibn on meta.SE (@Ollie)
I'm not sure if this is spam or something stranger, but it's very odd. There have been six very similar questions from six new users, in the last 48 hours, about the 'kudvenkat' youtube channel.
@JeffSchaller I came across 3 in the close vote queue so went looking for any more. I have mod flagged to link some of them, but they seem to keep coming!
@JeffSchaller I agree it's not obviously spam, per se, but it's also obviously not a legitimate question in search of an answer as they've received several answers but keep on posting the same question from new IDs. The watch makes sense, thanks.
