@SmokeDetector NAA I think, translation: "Is it all right now? It is not easy to distinguish 360p 720p using digital id. I studied for 2 days without success".
Oof, this user posted 17 identical answers within a 2 hour span, all of them (at least the half dozen I looked at) are advertising their service. Should I allspam the user, or just raise a custom flag, or both?
@ppwater That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen Wow... OK. Let me check again. I would swear that this authorization prompt only started showing up after installing FIRE. If it's just in chat, I don't see where there's any utility to it at all, at least not for me.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected, blacklisted user (230): Using highlight.js CDN by GyaniBaba on stackoverflow.com
If it was an SO profile, it would flood SOCVR for example. I don't know if other sites have similar issues. I've never allspammed so many posts so I just wanted to know if there's some protocol to follow that I'm unaware of.
@cigien The specified user has an abnormally high number of spam posts. Please consider flagging for moderator attention, otherwise use !!/report on the posts individually.
Hmm, question: the original watch was khalifklenton(?:@gmail\.com)?, but none of the latest posts actually have the @gmail.com bit. Can I unwatch that, and simply blacklist khalifklenton? There appear to be no FP.
@cigien Amazing, they forgot to put the domain name in their email address in the post they copy-pasted 16 times...I think either's fine, because they both actually match the same thing. Doesn't hurt to have the optional gmail.com, I think, to match it in case it does end up being present in future spam.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
Matched by the following regexes: totalassignmenthelp\.com on line 17787 of watched_keywords.txt \w{0,30}assign(?:ments?)?\W*+helps?\.[\w\.]*+ on line 21133 of watched_keywords.txt assignmenthelp\w*\.co on line 807 of blacklisted_websites.txt
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
*"I've follow your information and put your script on ma page do disable WMP, but it doesn't match! Click [here](link)! Were's my error ? What can I do ?"*
looks like an earnest (albeit noisy and vaguely incompetent) NAA question
I guess they are trying to use C# on a pure HTML web page or at least a server where they probably don't have C# at all and just want to disable right click
Hm.. now that you put it that way I can see what you mean... The Francois esolem-production.com 0033620411453 is making it took sus. I'll change my feedback I think :/
@cigien it scans all answers on the page when a new one is posted or there is some other activity, and then it finds the watched domain name (again), and reports it
you can tell it to ignore an individual post if that happens repeatedly, but this is from a while back already
Oh, I see. That's interesting. I haven't actually been looking to see if the same post is repeated in the list of TP when I decide whether to blacklist or not. Should I be looking out for that then?
@Yatin I don't want to get into a discussion on religion here, we can leave that for the Ministry :p But you could drop the "my" and it's still a pretty accurate statement.
A mod might see it, since he commented there already, but we shouldn't take any chances. Some of those comments are borderline abusive, even if the post is OK.
It would be a legitimate answer if that same answer weren't already posted to the question. Evaluated independent of context, it's a legitimate answer.
At least, that was my thinking. It wouldn't really be eligible for a NAA flag on SO. Other sites do handle this sort of thing differently, I believe.
