@Machavity @Makyen Usually I get a ping from Smokey that my autoflag was declined, and I've been asked to provide feedback about it (reply to that message) - but in this case there was no message, the R/A wastrue but was edited within the grace period to a correct question (receiving 2 ❌ in MS) and the autoflag subsequently declined by a mod on SO.
I guess my main concern (point I am making) is that I wasn't pinged, and discovered this by luck/chance.
@Machavity (We) I do dislike that moderators decline correct flags, but was only including that information to provide the complete story. --- The purpose of my comment here was only to complain that I was not pinged about the nullified autoflag; and given the chance to withdraw my flag, reverse my unfair downvote, and reply to the notification ping (for the record).
@Rob I'm not sure why there wasn't the normal notifications wrt. FP feedback. I'm not seeing them in any of the rooms in which I would expect them. SD doesn't appear to have an error which would correspond with the occurrence. I have not yet checked MS, which is where the message would originate.
@double-beep You may be pinged about an FP on an autoflagged post. This will be the result of me testing and you can ignore it.
It received one TP which was probably correct at the time that it occurred (question was 72x "=" and then received two fp's from Mach and Yatin (who commented) - but nowhere on this page did I get a ping about the ❌'s.
There is only one occurence of "Autoflagged FP" on this webpage, but there should be 2; one for your test, and one directed to me. Bug.
I did withdraw my downvote with an upvote, leaving the user (of almost 4 years on SO) with a reputation of 21. My flag is "disputed". I'd give the user the benefit of the doubt; not sure what they could have been posting with a post like that but they corrected it promptly, and it sits closed (awaiting repair from the OP).
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in answer, bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, link at beginning of answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, +2 more (314): Ubuntu 20.04 slow boot fresh install by gabalaye on askubuntu.com
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad ip for hostname in title, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching product name in body, +3 more (594): atozketodiet.com/toxiburn/ by toxiburn on askubuntu.com
Hello, dudes. As you know it is really hard to troll or spam Stackexchange.com. Why? Because of the way it handles spam: it deletes it. It is great, is not it? But I must say it makes Stackexchange.com too unwelcome and even cruel to the new users. Also it provides the best way to troll: to prete...
I just left a comment, "Can you please include a link which was a real, legit answer and got deleted wrongfully?" and they replied "@Kulfy Of course! Please wait a moment!". Funny thing is, the post was deleted after that comment.
@Makyen Would it make sense to add that as a straight-forward watch too?
The following looks a bit ridiculous for a single offender... one[\W_]*+six[\W_]*+one[\W_]*+nine[\W_]*+three[\W_]*+twenty[\W_]*+five[\W_]*+seven[\W_]*+one[\W_]*+four
