@Makyen That 'all caps JOHN' guy stilll has an account, yet in one post he questions "How is 'site I'm spamming' for data recovery if we face any data loss ??? I want some advice regarding it.", but in his next post he writes: "I am making an Arduino project integrated with the hard disk manufactured by 'site I'm spamming' and what projects can be made using GSM.". - Without clicking through
and investigating properly/fairly it looks like his statements are contradictory, repeatedly mention that site, and aren't particularly good answers (all deleted, the answers not his account). Next mention of that site and an irrelevant posts I will refer the moderators to my comment here.
@Shree That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Shree That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Shree Added qualityforge\.net to watchlist
@Shree HEAD isn't at tip of origin's master branch (local [1874688c]SmokeDetector: Auto watch of valueurincome\.com by Shree, remote [64c024ec]SmokeDetector: Auto watch of qualityforge\.net by Shree --autopull)
CI on 64c024e succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
@Rob Not really needed, the smoke-detectors instances are stable at the moment, it is only MS who didn't agree with the state of the smoke-detector, and therefore kept starting the wrong ones
Kinda just for myself, but I want to say it somewhere so I don't forget: Redis regex search is done and fast, the only issue is that a search can block the whole redis instance for 20+ seconds. To solve that, I need to copy the techniques mentioned here and implemented here
### WebSocketConnectionClosedException on angussidney/droplet at 2018-12-10T16:58:53Z: Connection is already closed. File "/home/ubuntu/charcoal/SmokeDetector/excepthook.py", line 44, in run_with_except_hook run_old(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 864, in run self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/charcoal/SmokeDetector/deletionwatcher.py", line 47, in _start msg = self.socket.recv()
File "/home/ubuntu/charcoal/SmokeDetector/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/websocket/_core.py", line 293, in recv
@Makyen teward/Lunar Eclipse
### BrokenPipeError on teward/Lunar Eclipse at 2018-12-10T14:36:15Z: [Errno 32] Broken pipe File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/excepthook.py", line 44, in run_with_except_hook run_old(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 864, in run self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/deletionwatcher.py", line 64, in _start self.socket.send("-" + action)
File "/home/smokey/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/websocket/_core.py", line 234, in send return self.send_frame(frame)
Something is causing SD instances to randomly come out of standby. This has happened multiple times on, I believe, all instances over the last day or two.
If that was the case, then I'd expect to see "received failover signal" messages from the SD instance that becomes active. In many (most?) cases where this has occurred the newly active instance has not posted that it received a failover signal. For instance this most recent occurrence does not have a failover message.
I was going to say that they have never posted that failover message for this problem. However, doing a search now indicates that sometimes it has been posted recently. I'd previously done the same search and seen that no message was posted for any occurrence.
@bummi I'm not sure, the site appears to allow identification questions, but has some criteria for them. I now note that all 3 questions are requesting identification of same song.
@bummi Yeah, they don't look like spam. Even the video is just a short clip of part of the song, but could be trying to promote it by getting people to identify it. I'm unsure if to go with duplicate as the close reason, as closing the other two as dups will result in all three questions sticking around longer than if they are independently closed as off-topic.
@Rob They don't look like plagiarism to me. It appears the question was re-written 3 times. Plagiarism requires actual copying of the content, not just re-posting something with the same concepts, but with different writing. However, I do plan to custom mod-flag to let the mods know about the three questions.
OK, was just reading here without checking the profile. The user went the extra mile to avoid duplicate detection. CMF is useful. I'm not registered there so I was leaving with the Mod's closed condition.
It's 4 days since OT, and despite posting 3 times there haven't been back since the 4th to see the answer they so desperately needed (unless they looked without logging in / used different account).
@Rob I was being a bit too literal in my reply. I was just indicating that a regex could be written to do so. Unfortunately, the detection that's triggered there isn't one of the ones that's just a regex detection. "Potentially bad ns for domain in {}" detects things that look like they might be domain names in posts (both in text and URLs).
It then does a a look-up to determine the NS that the domain uses. It would significantly reduce FP from that detection, and the others like it, if they included a dynamic whitelist, so we could add specific domains (or domain regexes so that things like Paint.NET could be distinguished).
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword with email in body, bad phone number in body, pattern-matching email in body, potentially bad keyword in body (236): are you in need of loan by Julie booth on money.SE
@SmokeDetector This feels like spam masquerading as a question. If it was just the person was asking about the process, then why are all the mentions of the product in ALL CAPS?
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
