> Blacklisted username, offensive body detected, offensive title detected ---------- Title - Offensive keyword: *nigga* Post - Offensive keyword: *nigga* Username - Position 1-6: nigga
I don't have a convenient way of searching without word boundaries (requires SEDE, I think), but I suppose there are many example strings in various languages on SO, usually in the language of the person asking.
@Magisch it's a conversation about feasibility - the theories of doing it, how the existing parts of the system fit together, what needs to change. That's gonna affect everyone, so it would be a little cruel of us to limit it to devs only. 'Sides, Pops is a CM, not a dev.
If the feasibility study turns out some available way of integration, then they might send us a dev to talk implementation - but even then, most of us here have some dev experience, and I'd welcome that in an implementation chat - we don't have to limit that to just Charcoal devs. Anyone can have good ideas.
@ArtOfCode I dont think the CM wants to talk with just about everybody in here. They're probably gonna take the "Charcoal team" to a private room for that.
Core Charcoal team is the people in the GitHub organisation, but I'd count our regulars as part of "extended Charcoal", so to speak.
@Magisch actually, there's probably a fair chance that we'll just have the chat in here
But if we do end up in a gallery or private room, then I want at least some of our regulars there - you've got a different point of view on the system than the people who write and admin it.
shrug Who knows. I'm envisaging some sort of system where metasmoke could send SE a signal that reduces the number of spam flags required on a post to 3 or something. But I might be entirely wrong :)
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: how to get long penis? by wazamhell on gaming.stackexchange.com (@angussidney) …
@Magisch just by being here you're already identifying yourself as someone who cares about the network. 'Sides, I expect that most if not all of our moddy people would vouch for y'all.
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: maleenhancementshop.info/xtrcut/ by kariegore on workplace.stackexchange.com…
As far as they know or care, I'm a moderately low rep user on SO and thats it
@SmokeDetector k
I'm a tad worried that they're gonna move on to do some integration with all the mod people and others will just not be able to participate due to being unvetted
They'll work it out. And if they don't, I'll tell 'em, or just link them here. We've got a buttload of good people here, and it would be a massive shame to ignore them and waste their input just because they're not mods.
We might need additional protection systems, we might not. Too early to tell. But honestly, our accuracy counters in metasmoke would be enough for me - they tell us, impartially, who the good people are.
IMO, we'd lose a significant amount of the value we have today if we removed all non-mods from the system. To the point where integration wouldn't actually mean much, because the people feeding back would be spread so thin. There's not much point to that - if we're doing integration, we've gotta do it with all of us or it's not gonna work at all.
@Magisch Also, I don't think there is any good faith in that answer. If there is any chance the answer is written in good faith, but it is just that the user doesn't understand what SE is for, then I usually use sd n and the NAA flag. This user, however, is not at all intending to give a helpful answer, and the answer is therefore abuse of SE, and it hence warrants sd k and the abusive flag.
