« first day (3571 days earlier)      last day (1378 days later) » 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

1:00 AM
hey there @linksassin, how're things going? still busy as?
 
@Shalvenay Things are starting to calm down. I hope to be able to get to your thing today.
 
@linksassin cool
 
1:40 AM
Daniel Kwan started a twitter thread for people to "share the work of a designer you really respect."
Amr Ammourazz wrote a twitter thread for #TabletopChopShop "about intentionality in design."
"The Outer Whorls - Designer Commentary 01," a devlog entry by ehronlime.
Craig Campbell wants to know (twitter link) "the coolest thing about the indie RPG you designed in one sentence."
Melancholy Trip by ThatAceGal is a oneshot RPG game about being trans, superpowered teens on the run from their shitty superhero mentors. As it's inspired by sad and angsty trans fanfics, please read the content warnings before playing.
 
2:04 AM
@Ash Interesting. My wife gets migraines & sometimes has a blue light in the corner of her vision when they are starting (visual artefacts are common with migraines apparently). It's progressed over the years to the point that blue LEDs can bring on a migraine. Also flashing lights (of any colour).
 
user15026
@Adeptus This is completely separate from my migraine stuff - it's not that it causes a migraine or headache, it's like literally nauseating stabbing pain.
 
2:54 AM
@Adeptus I briefly considered swapping the blue LED in my bench USB hub to a red LED, but decided I couldn't be arsed to have it there and just snipped it out instead
 
 
4 hours later…
6:31 AM
7
Q: What mechanic would be used for taking an opponent's weapon from its sheath on his belt in combat?

Sam LacrumbHere is the scenario. I am attacking a fighter with a crossbow. I run out of bolts and am unarmed as he charges at me with a spear. My opponent has a short sword on his belt. He misses with his initial spear attack and it's my turn. I want to take his sword from its sheath and if possible atta...

 
 
6 hours later…
12:03 PM
<ITAG>, everyone!
 
[wave]
 
12:22 PM
howdy howdy
weird, i just got 6 (andcounting?) upvotes to different answers.
 
Ah, it's you this time. Are they all accepted and (now) on a score of 10?
 
all but one!
 
Speak the Sky has dropped the price of Twilight Song as an experiment. It's a pastoral sci-fi map-and-story game where you play an immortal narrator living in a time of quiet wonder and strange transformation as the world becomes something new.
 
Yeah, that matches what happened to me and @Medix2.
 
@Someone_Evil is this a thing?
 
12:33 PM
Looking at the recent badgers it might be happening to @Rubiksmoose too
 
Every now and then somebody goes around using their upvotes to nudge people over into getting deserved-but-not-quite-achieved badgers.
Hmmm. Between the TTRPG Book Club talking about the art of gapping and closure games, and that Twitter thing for "one interesting thing about your indie game," I've been thinking about how Goblin Court has a "hidden" play option that to the best of my knowledge no one has yet actually played.
 
Yeah, it's probably not something to worry about, but it's a bit freaky to have a day where you earned 60 rep and 10 badgers
 
also feels like one of those things that theuser will leave the site and that rep will disappear :P
 
You'd keep the badgers though
 
badger, badger, badger, badger
 
12:44 PM
badgers? I don't need no stinking badgers!
 
12:56 PM
@Carcer mushroom! mushroom!
(I see you, fellow 2003 Internet Person.)
 
@Someone_Evil I was debating running statistics on the likelihood of it being chance but the timing means it's almost certainly not, suppose it's just somebody going "and you get a badge and you get a badge..."
 
@BESW (it is still bizarre to me when people don't immediately recognise that meme)
 
Also greetings fellow humans!
Huh, apparently not all edits ping you for followed posts
 
@Carcer To quote a fashy royalist who didn't know how to talk to women, "I grow old, I grow old."
 
heh. I feel old on the regular
 
1:03 PM
@Medix2 Edits which are too small don't notify the author (thus not followers either)
 
@BESW ah, it's a snake
 
advanced rolling technique for cat owners: place die on a raised surface, and wait
3
 
[takes notes]
 
And for dog/toddler owners: place in food bowl, and wait.
 
@Someone_Evil Yeah I didn't know edits were allowed to be too small, for some reason I thought there was a five-character minimum
 
1:06 PM
hah!
I was about to make that next joke for dogs
I'm sure there was an edit minimum at some point but I've seen someone make a single character edit to fix a typo in one of my answers recently
 
I had to include toddlers. My daughter ate an entire crayon yesterday.
 
@Carcer I will test his with my d3 and d120 and all others XD
 
6 little blue teeth grinning back at me.
 
oh dear
nontoxic crayons, hopefully
 
of course lol
didnt tell my wife, so she'll get a blue surprise sometime this morning while im at work.
 
1:08 PM
Trudging through a few of Lovecraft's stories, I had an epihpany (supported by a thought I had when I finished about three dozen non Sherlock Holmes AC Doyle stories) ... that bloated prose style (downright painful for me to read) strikes me as the kind of writing that informed Gygax's ponderous prose style in the AD&D books.
 
22
A: No notification was received for an edit to a post

SklivvzIn order to reduce noise sent to users, we only notify when "substantive" changes are happening on their posts. There are a few rules in how "substantive" is defined, but typically one of the following should be enough to trigger a message: edit to a question title the edit in the post body sh...

 
But then I remember a point that IIRC L Ron Hubbard once made: if you are being paid by the word, you need to write a lot of words ...
 
I really enjoy bloated prose, at least in a certain style
 
@Someone_Evil Yup found that as well, thanks!
 
And then I had a thought related to a Great Old One warlock: what if what the nameless ones had, and where they lived, were a version of dark matter and dark energy that sometimes crosses the boundaries to our usually experienced matter and energy ... which made me realize that I don't understand dark matter very well so I need to read up on it.
 
1:13 PM
I just kinda enjoy all writing... Never really felt that something was wrong just meant it might take longer. Some of this is probably because I cannot imagine books as a I read them so description just kinda falls flat on me
 
Good description doesn't have to be long winded; well, that's my taste/take on it.
 
@Medix2 Anaphantasia?
@KorvinStarmast No but it can become part of the description
 
@KorvinStarmast Dark Matter (hot and cold), Anti Matter, Dark Energy... A few things we don't know a lot about
 
(Medix, are you a linguist, or work on constructed languages?)
I seem to recall some points you made in that direction ...
 
@AncientSwordRage Not really since I can picture a beach (though it has to be a beach I've actually seen which I can then modify) but with books there's just kinda nothing there. I just gain information
@KorvinStarmast I majored in linguistics and did some undergraduate research, though I'm not going into the field
 
1:17 PM
@AncientSwordRage Robin Hobb does good description, and while she can get long winded, I find her descriptive style very easy to digest.
@Medix2 ah, got it, thanks.
 
@KorvinStarmast It's unsurprising that my favorite books are things like Hopscotch, If on a Winter's Night a Traveler, and We Need to Talk About Kevin
 
Patrician McKilip has a more economical style, I think, and yet I find that she paints a picture beautifully
 
@KorvinStarmast My go too purple prose is early Koontz
 
i want to float a question to you guys here before i make apost
tell me if its too crazy
or even worth asking
Can you cast rope trick inside of rope trick?
 
I was gonna say "float away" which sounds weird but I can't think of anything else so float away
 
Why would you?
 
Alice going up the rope tricks
 
That also definitely gets into weirdness of "is the second extradimensional space inside the first?" as well as "What can you see from inside the second space?" Hmmm
 
I had a GM once who decided that extradimensional spaces described with indefinite articles were actually all cells in an infinite honeycomb of pockets that all indefinite extradimensional spaces led to.
 
(1) Cast first rope trick
(2) Bait BBEG into first rope trick room
(3) Cast second rope trick
(4) Bait BBEG into second rope trick room
(5) Spam paralyzing spells and abilities till BBEG is paralyzed
 
1:25 PM
You'd need two ropes and the first would fall to the ground when the first spell ended, but who would suspect a random rope?
 
(6) Drop out of both rooms
(7) dispel the first rope trick.
Where is the BBEG?
 
Either in the second rope trick or on the floor outside
 
If the first, where does he go when it ends?
 
That seems similar to banishing them
 
I'd say you can't create the second extra dimensional space "Attacks and spells can't cross through the entrance into or out of the extradimensional space"
 
1:27 PM
Make a rope trick, get somebody to enter, banish them, end the rope trick before they return
 
Intradimensional space?
 
@NautArch Would the second casting be going through the entrance?
 
@Medix2 Ah, that's a good point.
i was reading that as the space itself, but that's wrong. It's just the entrance.
 
Once had a botched plane-shifting spell result in the party winding up 2/3 of the way between two planes, and then somebody tried to put something from one of those planes into their 2/3-shifted bag of holding, then shifted fully into a third plane before pulling the thing out of the bag.
 
So is this good enough for its own post?
yall seem engaged enough :p
 
1:29 PM
definitely
 
It's certainly confusing XD
 
i mean, i'm someone that generally prefers actual problems, but there are a lot (some may say majority) who like the theoretical ones.
 
I swear we have questions on banishing from extradimensional spaces which feels related to me
 
@Medix2 ill do some digging first
 
All this is one reason I was so happy to move into systems where the answer was always "whatever's the best thing for the table at the moment."
 
1:31 PM
Yeah, i'm realizing that the 'problem' with 5e is that the rules are semi-codified. It makes hard for it to just be "let's come up with something cool!" when there are rules that kinda/sorta apply. The vast majority of questions are here on that edge, and a huge amount of general table play is on that edge.
 
I might wait till this evening to post it...i nearly hit daily rep cap while I was asleep :p
 
Which is also why I think we have so many questions on 5e.
 
@NautArch And 4e, and 3.5e, and Pathfinder, and 13th Age, and... that "rules as half-baked laws of physics" approach to game-making is Deeply Ingrained and Rather Fraught.
One of the great things about many of the games I've played recently is that the rules are clearly story rules, not world rules.
So even when they're kinda wonky, you know where you stand with them.
 
@BESW Blind Eternities
@ThomasMarkov please share when you find them
 
@AncientSwordRage Dunno what that is.
 
1:39 PM
@BESW I don't know how to figure that out all the time, but I can reason with rules, even if semi-applied
@BESW it's the MTG term for spaces between spaces
 
@AncientSwordRage Well, that's what rules are for! But they don't have to be physics-based.
 
@BESW where its Elder Beings equivalent are from
@BESW but it can be a good jumping off point
 
A game can tell me what theme the outcome should touch, whether there's a triumph or crisis, which factions are involved, if someone has to give up something important, if something important is gained...
Physics engines don't care about whether stuff's important or triumphant or revelatory or any of those things that make stories actually interesting.
 
@AncientSwordRage I at least found nothing. Similar questions but nothing about the place you're supposed to end up no longer existing
 
@Medix2 I think in 3.5 the default was that either the spell would fail and you wouldn't move at all, or you'd get shunted to the astral plane. But don't quote me, it's been nearly ten years.
 
(When in doubt, 3.x's answer to planar shenanigans was fizzle, astral plane, or random plane.)
 
I had a player in 3.5 who banished his character straight out of the game that way.
 
@Medix2 Ill artiuclate the question that way and use double rope trick and banishment rope trick as examples.
Ive got another wild question
 
If it's about Wild Shape or Wild Magic Surges....
 
1:49 PM
Its not
its about a pegasus holding a sword
Could a pegasus wield a sword (like with its mouth) if it was proficient with swords?
 
GcL
No.
 
@BESW 13th age so far seems a bit more on the path away from that. A stepping stone, if you will.
 
That's just up to the GM I believe explicitly as well
 
Is there any simple or martial melee weapon a pegasus could conceivably wield?
 
I'm fairly certain that is explicitly left to the GM
 
GcL
1:51 PM
Unlikely. They require hands or gripping appendages.
Harness with a lance attached perhaps?
 
"gauntlets", aka horseshoes
 
Also depends how fantastical your setting is. Can you throw a dart with your mouth, well, I'm not a Pegasus so I don't know
 
GcL
@Carcer Good one.
 
Oh yeah there is a horseshoe item
 
I ask because some day I will be a 14th level Bard with Tenser's Transformation and Find Greater Steed.
 
GcL
1:52 PM
You want something above and beyond a magical flying horse?
A pegasus just isn't good enough? You need one that can wield a sword?
I like this bard.
Raising the bar-d
 
He would have proficiency if I cast tenser's while riding him...:P
 
GcL
You can't cast tensor's transformation on the steed.
 
Are you sure?
 
Oh Tenser's no advantage on unarmed strikes :(
 
Range of self
 
GcL
1:54 PM
@ThomasMarkov Yes.
 
"you can make any spell you cast that targets only you also target the mount."
 
GcL
"You endow yourself with endurance and martial prowess fueled by magic"
Even with the targeting mucking, that statement is clearly about the caster.
 
@GcL So "you" would refer to the caster in one time and the horse in the other
@GcL Is there any spell that targets only yourself that doesn't have that logic mean it can't apply to the mount?
 
GcL
Good point.
 
Theres the question, Ill post. "Does the mount from FGS benefit from Tenser's"
Unless youre conceding @GcL
 
1:56 PM
@ThomasMarkov I'll grab related questions including "what's a target"
 
@Medix2 oh god not this again
i take it back, i cant go through this again
 
We've got the weird questions of "aura of vitality + steed" and "wish + steed" and both talk about what counts as a target
 
@Medix2 I was about to link to those two
 
GcL
@Medix2 Doesn't appear to be. They all appear to use the term "you".
 
eh, its a worthwhile question, ill post it if yall agree.
 
GcL
1:58 PM
So you give a creature proficiency in an weapon it has no ability to use.
 
unless you think its dupe enough of one of those others
 
I will anyway: aura of vitality, and wish
 
@Someone_Evil These questions - is asking about Tenser's a dupe of either of these?
in your estimation
 
We also have one on find familiar and, surprising me, tiny hut
 
Ugh... I remember the find familiar one
 
2:03 PM
@Someone_Evil Yup, same; it was why I asked and answered this question
But also there is this question where the answer suggests doing exactly what you're asking. Having a steed so you can use tenser's transformation @ThomasMarkov
 
Fair, I'll cite @NautArch when I ask if I can strap a glaive to my rhinoceros's face.
Though that is a question assuming an answer to my question in order to answer a different question.
k what if you cast clone on the steed.
 
3
Q: How long would it take for me to train my animal companion to use a shortsword?

CasualI am using the UA Revised Ranger in one of our D&D games. I am currently 2nd level and have had my Ranger animal companion from the start instead of summoning him at 3rd level (the wolf doesn't gain the conclave features until 3rd level, as ruled by my DM). He is a normal wolf. I am training him...

 
(this spell is just ripe for shenanigans, isnt it)
 
FWIW the DMG does state: "A weapon must be held in hand."
@ThomasMarkov I'm still upset it doesn't boost unarmed strikes but I have a whole list of "types of attacks" and why there are too many so...
 
counter example: A monk's feet.
 
2:09 PM
@ThomasMarkov Huh? What Monk can do that?
 
kick? most of them probably
:p
 
@ThomasMarkov Kicks are not weapons
 
Are they not considered monk weapons?
i may be misremembering
 
@ThomasMarkov Are you a small race then?
 
I think there might be room for a question specifically about a self-spells affected/extended with FGS. The current ones seem to have other concerns, say action economy or whatever wish is
 
2:11 PM
@ThomasMarkov Nah they're actually deliberately separate for things like Kensei and whatnot and sentences like "You can roll a d4 in place of the normal damage of your unarmed strike or monk weapon."
 
Does it specify that unarmed strikes must be made with your hands/fists?
 
@Medix2 youre right
 
@Someone_Evil "or whatever wish is" Never a more accurate statement
@Yuuki Or head I believe
@Yuuki "You can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar forceful blow (none of which count as weapons)"
 
@Someone_Evil maybe a community answer to the question "what range self or touch spell dont work with FGS?"
 
@ThomasMarkov I think that gets into a problem of having people have to justify 50 different answers at once
 
2:13 PM
Yeah. thought of that right after i said it
 
We've also got this one: "Do spells with a range of “Self” target the caster?", so it's... complicated. Maybe self-area spells don't target the caster??
 
I actually think the best answer to this is case-by-case GM/group judgement by whether doubling up the spell makes sense, but I recognise that's not how a lot of people play.
 
Why, oh why, is spell targeting so complicated??!???!????!?????
 
@LizWeir Agreed, I gave up on defining targets in fifth edition XD
 
it's a bit of a weird position for me here, because I feel like my actual advice doesn't necessarily fit into how the questions are framed
 
2:18 PM
@BardicWizard Natural Language, the lack of keywords, and people wanting to follow the actual rules and not what Crawford would suggest be done
 
@LizWeir yep., I had an earlier question on find steed and paladin smite spells that had three cases, each of the sensible.
 
though I did get away with that one about how there's a clear RAW interpretation that I'd often ignore for the Enemies Abound/War Caster interaction ;-)
 
@BardicWizard We need a range, target and area of effect, but that got dropped in an earlier edition
 
Targets and the various types of attacks are two things where I scream "you could've done much better"
 
@Medix2 Pretty sure the notion of make a ruling as logical/fitting the table/story is actually codified in the game, but probably in a bit no-one reads
 
2:20 PM
@LizWeir this one
 
@Someone_Evil But that's not a "satisfying" answer :( (it is, but many will say it isn't)
 
@Someone_Evil Id like to see a poll of players who have never DM'd - how many have read the DMG?
 
@Someone_Evil It's in there, but it gets the problem of "well, in most cases, I will rule as X, but for story reasons, let's go with Y" Which makes it unclear the next time if it will be X or Y.
And that lack of clarity in turn makes it hard for players to make decisions based on expected response.
 
yeah, I do think clarity in the ruling process is important - that expected response thing is hugely important for player experience
and when it comes down to it, player experience is what I care about, far more than adherence to rules or narrative
4
 
the inconsistency of 5e on some of these things throws a monkey wrench in the attitude I espouse in this answer
"The rules are the primary tool a player has for aligning their expectations with realistic outcomes." -and some times its like pulling rivets with a screw driver.
 
2:24 PM
@ThomasMarkov Nah, it just means not all the rules do that as well as they could/should
 
got another one about FGS
if the spell cast requires concentration, are you concentrating on the spell for both you and your mount, or does the mount concentrate for itself
wait nvm i figured it out
 
Rereading Tenser’s Transformation, the second sentence says “Until the spell ends, you can’t cast spells...” (XGtE 168). Does the spell take effect a) after the action used to cast, or b) during the action in which case it would stop you from casting it?
@ThomasMarkov and the answer?
 
@BardicWizard Definitely not during or it just wouldn't work in the first place
 
@BardicWizard I have yet another case I could add to your flanking question lol
 
2:30 PM
@BardicWizard But also spell effects don't start until you finish casting the spell (which is why counterspell works in the first place) but also yeah... cast/cast/casted is definitely not a helpful thing
 
Oy vey, this is complicated
@ThomasMarkov add it then!
 
@BardicWizard just one more diagram explaining that if the dragon flies up, you actually have to walk under it to get flanking
 
@ThomasMarkov got it
 
@BardicWizard or alternatively, cast mold earth to dig a hole under the dragon and jump in.
 
@ThomasMarkov I don’t know how earth-while that’d be, but as a DM I’d mine it for all I could... sorry I couldn’t help it
 
2:36 PM
do spell effects persist on a creature that was polymorphed at time of casting who then is unpolymorphed?
 
@ThomasMarkov We definitely have a question on that... uh... somewhere(?)
 
i need it
cuz i might have an answer to the find familiar question :))))
 
Wait, why would polymorph just end spells?
 
Ill throw it out there anyway
nvm ring of spell storing is lame.
 
@Medix2 I think it just prevents you from casting spells, not being affected by them
 
2:38 PM
@ThomasMarkov Not sure if these are what you'd want but we have a question on polymorphing into an invalid target and one on invalid targets in general
 
i was gonna say, polymorph your familiar to a humanoid, let him attune to ring of spell storing with tensers, cast tensers, then unpolymorph.
but the ring only goes to 5th level
 
@ThomasMarkov I don't think they'd have to be polymorphed at all?
 
can the familiar attune to a ring?
I guess if he has proper anatomy.
 
25
Q: Can a familiar attune and wear or use a magic item?

NautArchIs it possible for a familiar to attune to and then wear or wield a magic item?

 
2:45 PM
0
Q: Why shouldn't I edit a question that has been closed?

NathanSI made some edits to tidy up a closed question, the sorts of edits that are commonplace around on RPG.SE, such as spelling mistakes, formatting, retagging, etc. However, I was told that I should not edit closed questions unless the edit is related to the reason it was closed (i.e. editing in info...

 
maaaan "does Tenser's Transformation prevent you casting itself" is reminding me of my least favourite argument I've ever seen apparently put forward sincerely, which was "the capstone of Dark Messiah Style in Exalted 2nd Edition isn't actually broken because the Instantaneous duration means that instead of being horribly OP, it just does absolutely nothing"
 
@LizWeir sorry, I’m a literalist and a rule lawyer (it’s a survival skill in my d&d club)
 
It's not broken if you squint hard enough that the rules don't make sense?
 
@LizWeir reminds me of this question of mine.
 
It’s official: D&D5E is really, really broken
 
2:51 PM
i figured out how to get tenser's onto your familiar.
 
Ehh... I think a lot of this comes from looking too closely at words
 
@BardicWizard I guess it depends on what you mean by "broken" and what you are comparing it to. I'm definitely not the biggest fan, but I'd rather play it than Pathfinder which is explicitly broken is a lot of ways. At least 5e is broken (rules-wise) in many ways that you have to look closely to find.
 
yeah, recognise how useful developing that kind of skill if your context tends to treat games that way - the Exalted thing I mentioned was very much a symptom of the wider culture of the White Wolf forum
 
2:54 PM
At it's core though, 5e is, IMO, a bad compromise between explicit rules and "just wing it" so that might be a broken premise. But if you mean broken power-wise, it's probably not so much.
 
it's just I've realised I have a much happier time if I treat signs that people are taking that kind of approach as a signal that the way the games are being played here are incompatible with the way I have fun, and I should look elsewhere
 
^
Though I've definitely been that guy.
 
@Rubiksmoose that’s fair. I’m probably a little biased because my groups usually boldly go into the parts of the premise that d&d doesn’t cover much.
 
I'm very good at rules-lawyering but I've realised that for me the winning move is not to play. ;-)
 
@LizWeir hah! Same, more or less.
 
2:55 PM
and, hm, may well be less good at rules-lawyering now that I've got "that's absurd so let's take another read" integrated quite deeply into my decision-making ;-)
 
Or more, I'm just too tired to get together and argue about things like rules anymore. I just want to have fun.
That probably means I'm old :P
 
^^ I like arguing about rules but I realize many people don’t. So I argue online instead.
 
@Someone_Evil +1
 
GcL
I was just about to say, arguing about rules is fun for some people
 
@ThomasMarkov I was writing up the same thing, darn XD
 
2:57 PM
@GcL oh for sure, and if that's your group's cup of tea, go for it!
I certainly used to enjoy it.
 
GcL
It's not, but if you don't reign in the edge case people, they'll walk all over the other classes.
 
@GcL I mean, we have a stack full of it
 
GcL
F'ing kung-fu panda druid/monk... never again!
 
@LizWeir zugzwang
 
Me and my DM are both pretty new to dnd, and hes very much a "the rules are guidelines, im here for the story" and im more like "the rules are the law of the universe", so we talk a lot out of game about how to balance our two approaches.
 
2:58 PM
@BardicWizard Well you're in the right place for that! lol
 
@LizWeir The traditions of Exalted Rules-Lawyery have a property that to this day I'm not sure how to describe concisely. The only word I've seen used for it has unflattering religious connotations, so it would be nice to have a more neutral word for it. The property being: rules-lawyering in favour of the same section of a text being read one way in one situation, and a very different way in a different situation.
 
GcL
@ThomasMarkov There are better games for stories than D&D.
 
(It's been a while since I participated in those discussions so it's hard to recall all the details and examples, but the general characterisation is what stuck in my memory.)
 
GcL
I think the rules of D&D are part of the enjoyment. Otherwise you'd play something with fewer rules.
 
yeah, I've blessedly forgotten most of those details
 
3:00 PM
@GcL 100% If you wanted to play a 1-page game, you would.
 
GcL
Honey Heist was like 3 pages!
 
I think that undersells the impact of D&D's position as Dominant Industry Standard
 
@Medix2 Assuming you knew such things existed
Which a lot of people don't
@GcL You gotta have some room for the funny hat table though!
 
GcL
If you like more rules and more esoteric stuff about wizards than D&D, I suggest Ars Magica.... you only need an associates degree in medieval history.
4
@Rubiksmoose The hat modifiers are key. Bear dressed up as a cosplay bear wearing a cowboy hat.
Wouldn't have sold it without the cowboy hat.
 
@GcL Oh that's brilliant. I'm totally using that the next time I play HH. (bear dressed up as a cosplay bear)
 
3:04 PM
@GcL gotta love those tables that tell you the bonuses for every imaginable kind of wood or gemstone to different kinds of magic <3
 
GcL
@Rubiksmoose You have a clever 8 year old to thank for that plan.
 
@GcL How'd the game go BTW?
 
Id like to see DND 5.5e be a hallmark card with the definition of "target" on the inside.
4
 
hahahaha
 
^^^ that’s actually something some people I know would find hilarious
 
GcL
3:06 PM
@LizWeir Then you've got to look up ... wtf is red coral and why is it so expensive... how was this even obtained in the Mediterranean circa 1225?! Rabbit holes abound.
 
@ThomasMarkov Toss in removing/clarifying the 12 types of attacks please XD
 
GcL
@Rubiksmoose Pretty well. Bears pretending to be people are pretty entertaining.
 
If there were a 9th level spell called Find Greatest Steed, what steeds would it have? So far Ive got Unicorn. Gonna do a homebrew review question.
 
GcL
People playing at being bears pretending to be people.
 
@ThomasMarkov I thought unicorn was already a standard option for greater steed?
 
GcL
3:08 PM
@ThomasMarkov Likely a motorcycle-helicopter-boat-rocket named "iron horse"... the less evil brother of "bad horse"
 
Noooooo that would be totally btoken
 
GcL
Who still can't wield a sword /S
 
If unicorn were on that list you would never not pick it, and Bard's would never not take FGS.
 
@ThomasMarkov You may find this helpful and also looking at all the summoning/conjuring spells since they mostly have a formula
 
@GcL Dont need a sword when you have a rapier on your face.
 
GcL
3:09 PM
@ThomasMarkov Like those cats that have two of them?
 
@Rubiksmoose FGS has CR 2 mounts, Unicorn is CR 5 with legendary actions.
 
GcL
Maybe you get a monocorn? it's a CR2 mount like a unicorn, but definitely less legendary. Who has even heard of a monocorn?!
 
CR 3 Nightmare would be a good candidate
 
Greatest Steed should let you ride Modron Primus
 
GcL
2020 is already a CR15 nightmare.
 
3:12 PM
^^^ this.
 
this is extremely funny, but only if you follow the somewhat esoteric chain of thought I just took going Unicorn -> Unicron -> Primus ;-)
 
@LizWeir I followed it!
 
@GcL ♫ bad horse, bad horse, bad horse, he's bad
@GcL What did they end up stealing?
 
@Rubiksmoose I guess I can add "A moose scolding a horse" to the list of things I never thought I'd imagine
 
hahahaha
 
3:15 PM
But also great reference!
 
@Medix2 I've left enough people going "whaaaaa?" when I make that sort of joke that I'm into the habit of sharing
you'll note that I haven't stopped making the jokes ;-P
 
GcL
@Rubiksmoose Gold.... in the shape of a honey comb or jar, it wasn't exactly clear and there was a lot of excited rapid chatter about it at the time. Anyway, it got chalked up to confusion about the term "golden honey" which is totally understandable when you're a bear.
 
@GcL * CR 19
 
GcL
@ThomasMarkov I'm leaving open the possible of even higher failed saves against stupidity later this year, so it remains to be seen.
 
@GcL brilliant and very very bear-like
 
3:18 PM
oh WOW ok so I looked up CR5 monsters for Greatest Steed and triceratops???
SOLD
Elementals, Bulettes and Giant Crocodiles on the list too
 
GcL
@LizWeir There might be Eberron dinosaurs from the Talenta Plains that would work. Some were designed as mounts in the original campaign setting.
 
4
Q: What is the impact of banishment on CR?

AnagkaiDisclaimer: I know that monster balance is never exact and I don't expect it to be, I'm looking for rough guidelines like they are given in the DMG for many traits. I like to flavor up my monsters with spells. One spell that seems particularly interesting is banishment. Monsters with that spell ...

 
3:36 PM
@GcL I continue to not know how to write queries for the SE database. =P
 
@ThomasMarkov Still Paladin only presumably, so it can only be taken by Bards?
 
@Xirema Oh well. It took 720 unprotections to teach a dozen rolestackers how to make database requests. Not a great efficiency, but at least it's above the implied negative efficiency!
 
@vicky_molokh-unsilenceMonica O_O
 
@Xirema I think you have some metas to read...
 
@Someone_Evil Im going to have to write it as a paladin class feature, methinks.
 
3:46 PM
At the risk of asking questions that have already been discussed, what motivated all those posts getting unprotected?
 
there are several metas discussing that
 
@Xirema Have you read this?
 
unless they didnt answer exactly what youre asking
 
@ThomasMarkov Hmm... that might be a very interesting hb rev. question then
(if you ask it as one)
 
@Someone_Evil I have now!
 
3:50 PM
@Xirema Cool, then the best answer to your question above is that we don't specifically know (they haven't told us)
 
Are there any spell slot consuming features that consume more than a single slot a time?
 
no...? Not that I can think of
There's arguably the spell mode of glyph of warding, but that isn't actually what you're going for
Or, can't one do multiple slots at the same time with Divine Smite?
 
still one slot at a time, but you can burn as many as you have attavks
the issue im having is find greatest steed should almost certainly be at least 6th level
and paladins only have two 5th level slots at level 19 and 20
So maybe I could make it a "5th level spell" but specify that it consumes two spell slots of 5th level or higher when it is cast
Which would be unique mechanically, but maybe it could work.
 
hm. if it's a top-level feature, I'd be tempted to just decouple it from the spell slots
 
@LizWeir but I want my Bard to be able to get it with magical secrets :P:P:P
 
3:59 PM
ah
yeah legit ;-)
 
Tenser's Unicorn needs to happen.
 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (3571 days earlier)      last day (1378 days later) »