« first day (3121 days earlier)      last day (1828 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@BESW Going on and on about intricate details makes more sense when the average reader isn't able to just Google what an elephant looks like.
Or do an image search for Tuscan countrysides.
 
Ah. I wouldn't call that purple, though.
The phrase "purple prose" implies excess to the point of distraction, melodramatic and unnecessary.
Good descriptive text is engaging and pulls you in, regardless of the level of detail.
> The life of the journalist is poor, nasty, brutish and short. So is his style. You, who are so adept at the lovely polishing of every grave and lucent phrase, will realize the magnitude of the task which confronted me when I found, after spending ten years as a journalist, learning to say exactly what I meant in short sentences, that I must learn, if I was to achieve literature and favourable reviews, to write as though I were not quite sure about what I meant but was jolly well going to say something all the same in sentences as long as possible.
 
user15026
12:47 AM
Hey, I know that book! :)
 
@Ash I still have to show Troggy the movie!
 
user15026
I still need to watch that myself.
 
Remember the Quivering Brethren?
 
user15026
giggles yes!
 
@Xirema this gave me a legitimately long and hearty laugh.
 
1:01 AM
@Ash And possibly one of the best casting choices I've ever seen: Stephen Fry as Mr. Mybug.
 
user15026
@BESW oh my gooooosh it's so uncomfortably perfect augh
 
@BESW I think the latest question is a stretch even for your amazing content finding skills. Find me a feat that does this, people on this site disagreed about what it did. No edition or context given.
 
Maybe....
7
Q: Does Monkey Grip allow wielding 2 handed weapons in 1 hand?

joedragonsAs typical in D&D a friend and I are having a debate, this time about whether or not Monkey Grip (3.5 complete warrior feat) allows a medium creature to wield a 2-handed medium weapon with one hand. He cites (PH p113): "For instance, a Small greatsword (a two-handed weapon for a Small creatu...

7
Q: What is the benefit of Monkey Grip?

AndrásMonkey Grip enables you to wield a larger weapon at the cost of -2 to attack. In the best case, a larger weapon gives you 3.5 extra damage: Greatsword 2d6 -> large Greatsword 3d6. The increase is even lower for smaller weapons. Power Attack gives you more damage increase for -2 to attack, and ...

 
I think they mean 'Great Weapon Master' for 5e. But without an edition it's impossible to know.
Though that is certainly a good option.
 
Ah, yes, that one seems to be controversial too.
 
1:15 AM
Hrmm... worth giving them explicit write-access here, if people want to help? (Don't think they're going to get to the 20 rep-barrier at this rate.)
 
@nitsua60 They certainly won't with that question. Your call. I'm sure we could find it in chat though
 
I think it's much better to go with "what problem are you facing that you think this is the solution to?"
 
Here's the thing: if there are people here saying "yeah, I'll help them" then I'm happy to grant access. The 20-rep restriction's purpose is to keep spambots out of chat, and this guy certainly isn't a bot. But if they're going to get in here and hear crickets, there's not much point.
So if someone wants to help him ping me; if not, that's no judgment against anyone.
 
@linksassin Since he's talking about more 3.5 stuff apparently, it could be Monkey Grip. Or Leap Attack. Or Piranha Strike, Arcane Strike...
I think any attempt to help in chat is just gonna be shouting random possibilities at 'em.
 
@BESW You're likely right. As usual.
 
1:24 AM
I'm... sorry?
 
@BESW oh my God just that clip was hilarious
 
Nothing to be sorry for. It's a positive quality. Just makes the rest of us look bad sometimes :P
 
(like every part, mistaking what he meant, Because I sure as hell did too, and then the hellfire preacher walking in right when he explained what he meant XD)
 
In context, you realize that Flora knows exactly what he means and is desperately trying to pretend she doesn't.
 
@BESW oooooh
Understandable
 
user15026
1:29 AM
Oh, I do need to watch this, especially because I wanna see what they do about the cows
 
That would be an extra uncomfortable situation for sure
 
That's why, for example, when he says "Do you know what DH Lawrence said?" she says "I do, actually, yes." It's to try and get him to shut up.
 
Ah
 
In the book:
in The Reading Room, Mar 6 '18 at 0:17, by BESW
> "There has been increasing discontent among the male intellectuals for some time at the thought that a woman wrote ‘Wuthering Heights’. I thought one of them would produce something of this kind, sooner or later. Well, I must just avoid him, that’s all."
- Stella Gibbons, Cold Comfort Farm, 1932
 
So that's why she cringed so hard when the lady tells him she asked a question about him but or something
 
1:31 AM
in The Reading Room, Mar 30 '17 at 0:05, by BESW
(Cold Comfort Farm satirises everything from futurism to rural romanticism to the preponderance of male voices in the literary canon.)
 
Hmm maybe I should read this
And watch that too
 
I think I still have a copy you can borrow.
 
user15026
I really enjoyed it for it's sheer ridiculousness and how well it satirized things
 
I love ridiculous things and satire
At least if I understand the satire anyway
 
> And it is only because I have in mind all those thousands of persons not unlike myself, who work in the vulgar and meaningless bustle of offices, shops and homes, and who are not always sure whether a sentence is Literature or whether it is just sheer flapdoodle, that I have adopted the method perfected by the late Herr Baedeker, and firmly marked what I consider the finer passages with one, two or three stars. In such a manner did the good man deal with cathedrals, hotels and paintings by men of genius. There seems no reason why it should not be applied to passages in novels.
(Baedeker invented the star rating system for tourist attractions. That quote is from the introduction where she explains she's going to star the best bits of her own novel.)
 
1:35 AM
XD
 
For example:
 
Nice
 
> "Hullo," said Flora, getting her blow in first. "I feel sure you must be Reuben. I'm Flora Poste, your cousin, you know. How do you do? I'm so glad to see somebody has come in for tea. Do sit down. Do you take milk?"
***The man's big body, etched menacingly against the bleak light that stabbed in from the low windows, did not move. His thoughts swirled like a beck in spate behind the sodden grey furrows of his face. A woman . . . Blast! Blast! Come to wrest away from him the land whose love fermented in his veins, like slow yeast. [...] Break her. Break. Keep hold and hold fast the land.
 
What the heck is a beck in spate
 
A flooding mountain stream.
 
1:39 AM
Ok then
 
"beck" comes from the same root as "brook," and you've probably encountered the idiom "a spate of [nouns]" meaning a large number of things appearing suddenly.
 
Ah yes I have
But the way the phrase is put together didn't allow me to connect those dots
 
One of the things the book is satirising is books which fetishise rural life and feature ridiculously bad attempts at accents in the process.
A lot of the dialect is almost impenetrable and that's part of the joke.
The POV character is just as baffled as we are.
 
To be fair, i find a ton of the different English accents very hard to parse
Not in books but actual people talking
 
And a good number of the weird words her characters use are just plain made up.
 
1:44 AM
Lol
That sounds both hilarious and confusing
 
You can work it out from context when it's important.
 
I do that a lot
It's how I've managed to read some books, and also how I learned a lot of words
 
But the ordinary words can be just as confusing; like it may take a while to figure out that it's set in the future with pay video-phones and private airplanes and a whole extra war.
Because they're just tossed in totally casually like of course these things are ordinary for you, dear reader.
 
What do you mean by extra war?
 
user15026
@BESW that took me a good chunk of the book to figure out
 
1:51 AM
sounds like an interesting book!
spam/gibberish answer:
 
> Claud, who had served in the Anglo-Nicaraguan wars of ’46, was at his ease in the comfortable silence in which they sat, and allowed the irony and grief of his natural expression to emerge from beneath the mask of cheerful idiocy with which he usually covered his sallow, charming face. He had seen his friends die in anguish in the wars. For him, the whole of the rest of his life was an amusing game which no man of taste and intelligence could permit himself to take seriously.
Cold Comfort Farm is a comic novel by English author Stella Gibbons, published in 1932. It parodies the romanticised, sometimes doom-laden accounts of rural life popular at the time, by writers such as Mary Webb. == Plot summary == Following the death of her parents, the book's heroine, Flora Poste, finds she is possessed "of every art and grace save that of earning her own living". She decides to take advantage of the fact that "no limits are set, either by society or one's own conscience, to the amount one may impose on one's relatives", and settles on visiting her distant relatives at ...
 
@BESW oh you just mean a made up one
 
Haha, I looked it up already after you mentioned it :P
 
And the movie's just as good. Like Princess Bride, the film captures much of the essence of the novel without even trying to encompass the novel's breadth.
 
a princess bride endorsement you say?
XD
 
1:59 AM
They're surprisingly similar.
Both are satirical novels who root their success in the gimmick of being keenly aware that they are novels and presenting the author as a character in their own right as part of the satire.
 
Nice
 
And then they got movie adaptations which understood that wouldn't work on film, but understood the style of the satire well enough that they found other ways to capture the same atmosphere and feeling.
 
I really do have a weakness for that kind of thing
 
So you get something that's very different in the particulars but feels similar.
 
Like I told you before how I loved the thing they did in Dracula
With the notes they left around being literally part of the story
 
2:03 AM
Ah, yeah. Cold Comfort Farm isn't epistolary that way, but the author is a solid presence throughout the book even though they don't cut away for asides.
You can feel the author's smug self-satisfaction with a particularly well-turned phrase, and when they outdo themselves they leave a couple asterisks to call our attention to it.
 
@BESW Yeah I think that will hit the same spot in my brain though
 
Ben
2:14 AM
Afternoon all
Just recently sprayed myself full in the face with deodorant
Up the nose and in the mouth and everything
 
....this is one reason I don't use spray deodorant. I don't trust myself.
Though I think I've become allergic to what I am using.
 
Ugh that happened to me, I got allergic to what I used to use
I use something else now but im afraid to use it much
 
Ben
I didn't use deodorant for a while... I don't sweat very much at all.
But I figured the whole "you can't smell you" conundrum is reason enough to at least use it for the masking factor
 
It might just be how hot it usually is here but I sweat plenty
@Ben that makes me extremely self conscious about sweating
You don't even know
 
Ben
Sweat is one thing. BO is another thing. Generally with one comes the other, but they're are usually exclusive. Hygeine usually helps with BO
@BESW I think that's a meme? But I'm not sure I get it haha
@BESW and anyone else: currently a suggested label for my new "Corruption" system is the "Influence" system, where players can choose to submit or resist the "Influence". I did a bit of searching to find a synonym, to find a more complimentary word, and thought of "Dominance" instead?
 
2:36 AM
Hmm. Depends on the flavor you're going for.
 
Ben
Yeah. I'm not entirely happy with it
 
It's a strong Christian eschatological aesthetic, right?
 
Ben
[Googles "eschatological"]… Yes
Like, it's an evil force trying to take control of the PCs, wanting to control them, but it's not about servitude
 
Then I suggest pushing into satanic imagery and specifically titles and names of the Devil.
 
user15026
@Ben Dominance might not be the best choice then
 
Ben
2:39 AM
more like "remove them" by swaying their opinions, etc
Yeah
 
user15026
(because most people are going to think about it as a servile positioning then)
 
The Destroyer, the Father of Lies, the Accuser, the Adversary, the Tempter, the Prince of Darkness...
 
Ben
Yeah. It's not about saying "yes sir, no sir", it's more just like "Actually, being evil is pretty cool. We should grab a beer sometime"
 
How about Temptation, Darkness, or Lies?
 
Ben
@BESW I think you just gave me the names for the evil submission tree haha
 
2:42 AM
Making the question, "Do you embrace temptation or resist it"?
 
Ben
Well, thinking about it, it can still be the "Corruption" system. The mechanic is influence, which is embraced or resisted?
I do that a lot haha. Make a statement and end it with "?"
 
Ben
3:04 AM
Ok, you can choose to deny the influence (delusion); defy the influence (defiance); or... "something" which leads to radicalism. I keep going to "reject", but that similar to denial
 
@Ben Detest the influence (radicalization)
 
Ben
Perfect!
I also went with temptation, darkness and hatred
which can sort of slot into what I already have for my subclasses. Bloodlust, Decay and Madness
 
I like the symetry of the 3 options for everything. However what happens if I Detest the bloodlust, do I get madness? As in are all options valid responses to all influences and therefore there is 9 possible outcomes?
Do you also have 3 options for embracing it?
 
Ben
Yeah three options for embracing are the above, three options for resisting are delusion, defiance and radicalism
So, you can choose to resist, or embrace, and how you choose to do so determines where you end up
 
3:20 AM
Power corrupts. Ergo most high level spellcasters are dangerous.
 
So let me check I understand.

Types: Bloodlust, Decay, Madness
Resist: Deny (delusion), Defy (defiance), Detest (Hatred)
Embrace: ??? (temptation), ??? (darkness), ??? (Hatred)
Have I got that right? Do you have words to fill the gaps?
 
Ben
Embrace: ??? (temptation, previously bloodlust); ??? (darkness, previously decay); ??? (hatred, previously madness)
And no, not yet
 
I keep on thinking "Mind Blank" or "cast dominate person on yourself"
 
Ben
So a situation might be a corridor full of mutilated corpses. Enough to generate "influence". You can choose to resist the influence, by thinking "nope. this isn't real" (delusion), or think "This is grotesque!" (radicalism), or the other end, you can think "they deserved it" (hatred), or "delicious" (temptation)
 
3:27 AM
@Ben So the types have been renamed? Or was I correct about that? It's a bit weird having only hatred on both lists
 
Ben
Types have been renamed, yeah
Oh, Detest is radicalism. missed that haha
 
Ah so bad things happen even if you resist. Just different bad things
 
Ben
Yeah
 
Diablo is about inevitability.
 
Ben
At the end of it all, no one gets out unscathed.
@BESW I am really liking that. Very profound
And intimidating. Hehe
 
3:31 AM
It's not a theme I'm particularly interested in but I can see the appeal intellectually.
 
Embrace: Succumb (Temptation), Savour (Darkness), Seethe (Hatred)
 
Ben
@linksassin Ohhh yeah you're on the ball!
 
So do these 6 types of corruption have separate tracks? And each time you take one of those actions you move closer to it?
 
Ben
So what I have at the moment is a system that as "influence" is collected, it starts to affect the PCs. At certain tiers, it affects skills, saves, and eventually grants abilities
Currently I only have the tree for "embracing", as my original draft didn't account for those that wanted to resist the corruption, only to lose their character anyway
So basically, as it was, there was no reward for the hard work of resisting, only to have all that hard work rewarded with the loss of their character
This system captures that.
 
I know, I was one of the ones who pointed that out.
 
Ben
3:37 AM
Or, it should.
Ah yes. True
 
Are you going to have 2 tracks for influence or 6?
 
Ben
6
 
I would suggest 6. Make it so that the players need to balance which option they take
Choosing to deny everything will quickly drive them insane. If they want to make it to the end of the campaign they need to choose to sometimes embrace it as well
 
Ben
I was also thinking of creating a simpler system, with just the two as an alternative to this one, but yeah. the 6 track is what I want to be the main affair
 
I would also advise to make it very difficult/impossible to remove influence once assigned. That way if they choose to deny a lot early they struggle to get rid of the effects later.
 
Ben
3:40 AM
The idea is that resisting become easier as you gain influence. At first, you deny it, with a reaction that has you rocking back and forth for 20 minutes going "it's not real; it's not real; there's hallucinogens in the air or something", whereas later, you see something just as bad and it's like "meh."
Embracing on the other hand, becomes a slippery slope. At first, seeing a corpse makes you salivate, but by the end you have to physically resist the urge to rip something apartand eat it
 
Once this system is complete, you could consider making some challenges where not all 6 options are available. Either through magic or circumstance some options just might not make sense and they might be forced to take points somewhere they hadn't planned.
 
Ben
@BESW you suggested a save system based on influence points collected? Resisting is roll over the save threshold, and embracing is under?
 
That was one idea, yes.
 
Ben
Also @KorvinStarmast I read your suggestions for characters/items. It's a good idea to allow the characters to endure :)
 
Roll-over starts with a headlong rush of accumulation and then slows down dramatically; roll-under starts slowly but the more you have the faster you get more.
 
Ben
3:49 AM
My wording that I have in my notes is confusing. Haha
- Resisting the influence is hard at first, but becomes easier as Influence is collected. As influence is inflicted, you need to roll under your total influence score to resist.
- Embracing is hard at first, but becomes easier as Influence is collected. As influence is inflicted, you need to roll over your total influence score to embrace.
That needs to be reworded
 
Is that idea that on a successful resist roll you gain no influence while on a successful embrace roll you do gain influence?
 
Ben
@linksassin Embracing it isn't voluntary. It's about those dark thoughts in the back of your mind get louder and more convincing
Ok, I think I have it.
Resist: When influence is inflicted, roll a d20 and add your current influence score. If you roll over, gain an influence point.
Embrace: When influence is inflicted, roll a d20 and add your current influence score. If you roll under, gain an influence point.
So, by the end, you're at 15 influence, and you're resisting, you roll a 10, so 25 total. Easy pass.
And vice versa, you're rolling to embrace - 15 points, roll a 10... hard fail
 
It should be:
- Resisting the influence is hard at first, but becomes easier as Influence is collected. When you choose to resist make an influence roll, if you roll above your current influence score you suffer additional influence of the appropriate type.
- Embracing is hard at first, but becomes easier as Influence is collected. As influence is inflicted. When you choose to embrace make an influence roll, if you roll below your current influence score you gain influcence of the appropriate type.
 
Ben
Yeah, "under or over what?" as I have it. Haha
 
Ah, I was thinking "roll a d20 and compare it to your current influence score. If you roll over/under your current influence score, gain an influence point."
 
Ben
3:58 AM
That is a lot simpler.
 
The problem with this system is that unless there is a base influence level there is never a reason not to embrace. You can't roll under it so you can just do it for free.
 
Yeah, you gotta start somewhere.
 
Ben
Maybe you start at 0 or 20, for each scale?
 
D20 may not be the best dice either. 2d10 might be more interesting I think.
@Ben Starting with 0 is the problem. You can't possibly embrace since it requires a roll under 0. Not possible.
 
Ben
Yeah. The "more dice" situation. and in D&D you roll a d20 for everything
Yeah
 
4:00 AM
So I would choose to embrace every time and never gain influences at all.
 
Ben
Unless there is a DC. DC 10 for this interaction
 
DC 10 + Influence score?
 
Ben
Roll 2d10, add corruption, if you roll under/ over, gain a point
One or the other
 
What about an appropriate saving throw per type? Intelligence for Deny/Succumb, Charisma for Defy/Savour and Wisdom for Detest/Seethe
 
Ben
On one hand, if the DC is affected by each player's influence score, the DM needs to know what each player's current level is, and calculate each person's outcome; or they need to tell them what the base DC is.
 
4:05 AM
Make the save vs DC of the influence + your corruption score
 
Hmmm.
 
Ben
If you go with modify your roll with your current score, the DC does not need to be revealed
 
There's another possible structure but it'd mean ripping out a lot of the work you've done.
 
On Resists rolls a failed save adds a point. On embrace a successful one does.
 
Ben
@BESW At this point I have a scaffold, and am just filling in the gaps with plasterboard haha
 
4:07 AM
By adding their ability scores into the mix it makes their stats important and they may choose to embrace with int checks and resist with charisma based on their stats.
 
No rolls to embrace. Only roll to resist, on a roll-under basis... but the powers you gain from gathering influence cause un-resistible influence gains every time they're used.
 
Ben
@BESW I did have that as my third degree of corruption. you gain an ability that automatically inflicts a point
 
That's probably decent. I might make is "Use this ability once/rest for free. Each additional use add two points of influence to your hatred corruption"
 
Also, you really need to playtest the length of your corruption track.
 
Ben
@BESW Can you give an example?
Jeez my typing today is horrendous
@BESW Yeah
 
4:11 AM
In Cthulhu Dark, a six-point roll-over track usually winds up with someone hitting 5 between 3/4 and 2/3 of the way through a two- or three-hour session.
Example of what?
 
Ben
I'm a little lost as to what gives what. Rolling to resist and automatic gains
 
Embrace: Automattically add a point to the appropriate track
Resist: Make a roll, if you succeed you avoid taking a point
Use a power from corruption: Automatically take a point on the same track for using the ability
 
Ben
@linksassin And everyone gets these abilities..?
 
Hmmm.
You know what, it might be cool to do this:
 
They gain the ability based on their corruption score on the appropriate track. Similar to your original system.
 
Ben
4:17 AM
@linksassin Yeah. I'm just clarifying that the players resisting also gain these abilities that automatically inflict corruption.
Like, Deluded players can for example imagine a door in a wall that actually just appears. Gain an influence point
 
> When confronted with an Influential experience, you may choose to Embrace it (gain 2 Corruption) or Resist it (roll over your current Influence to lose 1 Corruption; if you fail, gain 1 Corruption).
Whenever you use a power that you have access to because of your Corruption score, gain 1 Corruption.
 
@Ben Yes, if they are far enough up a corruption track.
 
Ben
Ok
 
So you can fall headlong into Corruption to get awesome abilities, and then backpedal to avoid maxing it out. Or you can try to stay low as long as possible.
 
Ben
@BESW I was thinking that embracing can raise the amount of points you gain as you go. 1st degree 1 point, 2nd degree two points, etc
That way it can be that "slippery slope"
 
4:20 AM
@BESW That system makes it pretty easy to resist forever.
@Ben I think that's just making it more complex and swingy. It won't change things overly much.
 
@linksassin I'm assuming a previously stated element that some encounters impose Corruption automagically because they're just that Influential.
 
Ben
To clarify, are we thinking of one, or two "scores", for each resisting and embracing?
I was thinking one overall "corruption" or "influence" score
 
I think there is one total corruption score. Which is the sum of your points in the 6 corruption tracks.
 
Ben
@linksassin which would require keeping track of how much of each you've done. 2 delusion, 4 radicalism, 12 temptation.
 
I just watched the 1959 horror film House on Haunted Hill, which features a married couple that each think the other is trying to kill them.
 
4:27 AM
@Ben Yes, tracking them independently will be required.
 
"Don't sit up all night thinking of ways to get rid of me. It makes wrinkles."
 
Ben
@BESW I really do enjoy those nonchalant responses
 
And Vincent Price is delivering that line, which makes it even better.
 
user15026
@BESW I don't know the context really for this and I never ever want to.
 
user15026
I like it as it is.
 
user15026
4:30 AM
Okay, yes his delivery is awesome even though I don't know who he is or anything else about this.
 
BESW explains the context in his message right above that quote
:P
 
Ben
Yes. There are many ways to deliver the line. But that's precisely how I read it haha
 
It's a great film.
 
user15026
@V2Blast well, yes, but it's sufficiently divorced from the rest of the work, so I don't need that surrounding context ;P
 
Ben
"Please don't scratch. I have sensitive skin".
 
4:32 AM
They take full advantage of the audience's expectation that certain gruesomenesses will happen off-screen because of the censors... to hide twists and reveals in the off-scene-ness by letting us assume what happens and then later revealing it's not exactly like that.
 
Ben
@BESW I did really enjoy that change of expression too.
 
In a modern film that would seem clumsy and obvious, but for a 50s audience it'd be a lot more surprising.
 
Ben
Very "mic drop"
 
@Ben I love how the film presents his character and his wife's.
Like, he's convinced she's cheating on him and plotting to murder him for his money, and she's all "I'm his fourth wife and the previous three all died suspiciously do you THINK I'm an idiot?" but for most of the film you're left hanging if either, both, or neither are paranoid or justified.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer (260): How do I get the players with non-adventurer back stories to go on adventures? by Terri Pamela on rpg.SE (@doppelgreener)
 
Ben
4:37 AM
Did they remake that film? Or is it another by the same name?
 
Meanwhile, he's paying five people $10,000 each to stay in a haunted house with him and his wife, and keeps insisting it's her idea and she's... not arguing, but in that "Yes, dear, I'm picking my battles" kind of way while the man who owns the house keeps necking booze from the bottle and pronouncing that everyone's already as good as dead.
@Ben 1999's House on Haunted Hill is a remake.
 
Ben
Ok
 
There was a sequel to the remake in 2007, and there's work on both a new remake AND a prequel to the original.
 
Ben
I think I remember one of my friends wanting to watch it, but they accidentally picked the wrong movie... "the house on (something) lane" or something like that.
Was not what we were expecting
@linksassin So just thinking out loud: If I choose to embrace, I'm at 10 points, which might be enough to jump up to a new level, so I gain 2 points this time, rather than just 1.
then I decide if it's temptation, darkness or hatred, and apply appropriately
Is that what your were thinking ?
And, a thought: If I've been embracing the whole time, and suddenly decide to resist... mechanically that would be fairly easy, no?
 
@Ben That sounds right. And yes I guess it is.
 
Ben
4:53 AM
Perhaps advantage/disadvantage can play part there.
 
I feel like you're trying to accommodate theoretical player choices more than facilitate the game you're designing.
 
Ben
Potentially
I am a programmer, after all. Lol
 
Then you know that one of the reasons MS Word stinks is that it tries to also be a spreadsheet program and a drawing program.
 
Ben
Very good point. Lol
 
Diablo is a pretty carefully curated experience, tonally.
 
Ben
4:57 AM
So, in that case defining an overall feel, or tone might help keep things on track.
There is an influence, that is trying to corrupt everything.
 
Ben
5:31 AM
[Loud, obviously whiny groan] Rei is wearing white in the Star Wars trailer.
 
she grew up in a desert
 
Ben
She wears grey in the other movies.
The point is that I want her to be a grey Jedi. And if she wears white, that's a representation of that not happening.
 
mm
 
Ben
[Insert toddler tantrum]
 
I do think the times she wore grey were her old desert outfit
which is gonna be stained by all that sand and dust and get less white
 
Ben
5:39 AM
Which is fine. It's the colour association. All the good guys wore white. They were Jedi, the Light side. All the bad guys wore black. The Sit, on the Dark Side. In the comics and other media that have the grey Jedi, they wear grey.
 
Gods forbid the force users like colours or have fashion sense hey?
 
Ben
Doesn't really matter why they wear those colours, it's just a representation of their alignment
 
TBH I think the grey jedi theory got shot in the foot during the closing scenes of the last jedi.
 
Ben
@linksassin My friend is an art teacher and he said something like "god forbid they switch up form a tome and go with a shade!"
I snarfed.
 
I wanted it too but I don't think it's going to happen
 
Ben
5:41 AM
[Refer to above toddler tantrum]
Lol
 
it would be cool
I won't dispute that
but I don't think it's gonna happen
 
Ben
I watched one of those "things you missed in the trailer" videos, in hopes of something I might have missed in that regard, but that's when it pointed out that she was actually wearing white.
However, they did point out a potential for KR to redeem himself, but I dunno
That's a lot shakier
 
Main thing I noticed is that it's a really long walk to the middle of that desert shes standing in. No transport in sight. Why would she be there? And why did she walk?
 
Ben
@linksassin Orbital Drop. Hah
 
@Ben Ah yes, I remember that famous scene when good guy Luke Skywalker faced down the evil black-clad Kylo Ren in his iconic light-brown cloak.
 
Ben
5:49 AM
Lol
There was something off about that scene. And I didn't actually realise what until now
As cool as it was
Though for some reason I thought you wear making a black/blue or with/gold dress reference
 
Does this question seems like they are asking for a review of someone elses homebrew? I'm not sure how to respond since link only is bad, but so it copy-pasting the content if it isn't theirs.
 
Ben
 
[amused]
 
lol
 
And who can forget the iconic all-black armor worn by the faceless soldiers commanded by Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine?
 
Ben
5:56 AM
@linksassin Potentially ask them to explain why they feel it is unbalanced?
 
@Ben It's more about they need to put the content of the homebrew into the question. Otherwise it's a link only post. But if it isn't theirs I'm not sure they should be reproducing it without permission
 
Ben
@BESW Yeah she did
 
@BESW The light side would never give in to temptation like that.
 
Ben
@linksassin Well, people ask questions about existing content. What I'm saying is post the part of the class they're having issue with; a particular ability, or something like that, and state why they feel it is unbalanced?
They don't need to post the entire build
 
6:01 AM
@Ben That's not a bad idea. The whole class is way too broad for a homebrew review anyway.
 
Ben
Also, is there a post explaining DanD's… unsavoury reputation?
Could be useful in this case
 
It is only an issue if people don't know what they are posting is homebrew. OP knows that this is so I don't think it applies.
 
Ben
Is that all? I feel like a lot of their stuff is just "wouldn't it be cool if...", without much more consideration than that. So unbalanced content is fairly common
 
Well yeah, there is no quality standards enforced on their homebrew content. But how would you?
 
Ben
Yeah, not saying there is, it's just a part of the warning label. Approach with caution.
 
6:09 AM
 
Ben
Case in point haha
 
 
68
Q: Why does dandwiki have a poor reputation?

Derek StuckiDandwiki has a markedly poor reputation in the online RPG community; material from it is often dismissed out of hand, and users are encouraged to avoid it and to not incorporate work posted there into their games. For what reasons has the site gained this reputation?

 
Ben
Ah yes. I was looking on meta
 
Ben
6:29 AM
@linksassin They edited the title from "is it balanced" to "how strong is it"...
 
Not sure how that's an improvement
 
Ben
Yeah
Welp. Never mind. OP deleted it
 
rip
 
6:45 AM
Well, they deleted it immediately after taking the tour. So that's a plus for our tour I guess?
 
Ben
Oh really?
How'd you figure that?
 
On another post a new users comments "I did not know this was how this website worked" -> ignores links to tour and argues it.
@Ben I went and looked at the post. They recently earned a badge.
 
Ben
Ohh right
Nice
 
Nevermind it was the editor badge...
 
Ben
Ah.
 
6:47 AM
Why do people not bother to read the tour? It saves so much time...
 
Ben
@linksassin In this regard I would make it so that it's difficult to remove, at the very most. I want players to be able to manage their levels, but I agree it would be better to make it that the task is difficult at most.
Thematically removing anything to do with "resistance" would be difficult. Embracing corruption on the other hand is something that can be removed a little easier. "Purging evil".
OK: what if removing influence affects your influence caused by embracing things only. That way resisting is more enticing because the effects you get are more permanent, if harder to obtain..?
Whereas embracing it is easier, but temporary
 
If they want to manage their levels they need to start using a different response to influence. Deny too high? Stop denying it for a whie.
I think any mechanic that allows them to reduce it removes some of the feel of inevitability.
"Oh that's ok that I got corrupted, I'll just drink some potions later and be fine"
Any removals should be 1 time use and have a cost attached.
 
Ben
Yeah. Which means the sources to remove it need to be sparse. Especially if some forms of influence are automatically one type or an other, regardless of choice
 
Or not sparse, but painful.
@Ben Painful for the player. Like taking disadvantage on a roll vs an Influential target to reduce your Corruption.
 
Ben
@BESW Like, damage, or stat damage, or something else?
Ahh right
 
6:57 AM
@Ben Anything that hurts the players in some way. Disadvantage, hp damage, stat damage, conditions, make sure there is a non-insignificant sort attached
 
Or: If you refrain from using any Corrupted abilities during an entire fight, you lose Corruption equal to the half the number of rounds the fight lasted.
 
Ben
Yeah. I was thinking it needs to be something more permanent, because "damage" can be recovered.
 
You should also put a floor on the amount of Corruption that can be removed.
Either a flat floor like, if the max Corruption is 20 then you can never go below 10 Corruption through loss-of-Corruption abilities.
 
Ben
@BESW I'm thinking "double". If influence inflicts one point, removing it should be 2. Risk vs reward
 

« first day (3121 days earlier)      last day (1828 days later) »