@BESW Deer control is an issue here. The method by which the population is controlled is rather divisive. Very few think that importing a pack or two of wolves is a good plan.... which is sad.
It's healthy to have a fear of apex predators. I'm just saying it really should have been given more consideration along side hiring dudes with guns to stalk around parks.
I don't know what the change would look like now, because Shirely we can't just go back to, say, the pre-Contact Indigenous floor plan. But talking to the Indigenous folx would probably be a good place to start planning such a change.
@BESW Yeah... also have to balance desire to go populate space. I really like the very hippy outlook, but at the same time, definitely need spaceships.
Harmony with nature is great until space rock disrupts nature.
@goodguy5 No, like... talk to them now. They have perspectives and insights we need, and also the right to have a strong voice in what happens to their land.
@BESW So you are remiss that we can't as the pre-contact indigenous people what they would have wanted, but at least we can ask their descendants. Sorry; your original statement just confused me. Am I understanding?
@ColinGross I'm confident we can find creative ways to combine the two. Living in harmony doesn't mean rejecting progress--just redefining progress and its priorities.
@DavidCoffron I mean, obviously it would have been nice to not steal their land and do all those awful things, but I'm saying we can't revert to the way it was so we need to put them at the spearhead of determining what we should do.
Treat 'em like the sovereign nations they are, inherently possessing the dignity of self-determination not granted like a boon by an occupying force.
2
And that, in turn, would bring Indigenous systems of knowing to the forefront of ecological planning. Those systems are better equipped to handle it than our chopped-up-into-chunks version of the sciences where each discipline is constantly shocked when other disciplines have something useful to offer their specialty.
The dire wolf (Canis dirus, "fearsome dog") is an extinct species of the genus Canis. It is one of the most famous prehistoric carnivores in North America, along with its extinct competitor, the sabre-toothed cat Smilodon fatalis. The dire wolf lived in the Americas during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene epochs (125,000–9,440 years ago). The species was named in 1858, four years after the first specimen had been found. Two subspecies are recognized: Canis dirus guildayi and Canis dirus dirus. The dire wolf probably evolved from Armbruster's wolf (Canis armbrusteri) in North America. The...
Diprotodon, meaning "two forward teeth", is the largest known marsupial to have ever lived. Along with many other members of a group of species collectively known as the "Australian megafauna", it existed from approximately 1.6 million years ago until extinction some 46,000 years ago (through most of the Pleistocene epoch).
Diprotodon species fossils have been found in sites across mainland Australia, including complete skulls and skeletons, as well as hair and foot impressions. Female skeletons have been found with babies located where the mother's pouch would have been. The largest specimens...
@Ash (and anyone else who might know) Do you know of any book/film/etc about an alternate history in which Australia's megafauna are domesticated by its indigenous peoples?
There were some responses in the chat, but apparently most of the people who have written that kind of book were... not very interested in accurate or respectful depictions of the Indigenous peoples.
One kind of whitespace vs many whitespace characters. I wonder if I could troll the next developers meeting with that as some kind of diversity, equity, and inclusion topic.
I know there's at least one other person in there that writes LaTeX and can help me bring that around to typesetting pun... "yes yes, the kernel is important, but so is the kerning!"
@DavidCoffron Which ones are safe spaces?
Well, there's a change that I'm surprised I hadn't noticed.
The editions prior to 5 used fully justified columns. 5e typesetting is ragged right.
Was the text in the 4th edition books ragged right?
Is it inappropriate to downvote a question that says "I have a question about rule X, I don't have the book these rules are in"? I'd think that'd fall under insufficient research effort.
I don't think you'd have to. The context is probably sufficiently obscure that most readers would skip over the nonsense about ragged right and just misinterpret the fully justified bit.
To cast a spell from a scroll that is on your list but of a higher level you can cast, you need to make a spellcasting ability check (wasting the spell scroll on a failure).
What happens if a low level sorcerer tries to apply metamagic to a high level spell he attempts to cast from a spell scrol...
I'm planning on making a Goblin Ranger (Hunter subclass). I was reading over the Giant Killer ability:
Giant Killer: When a Large or larger creature within 5 feet of you hits or misses you with an attack, you can use your Reaction to attack that creature immediately after its attack, provid...
@Carcer it could be part of an answer backed by specific game experience showing that your specific computer implementation solved a similar problem at your table ;)
But...it's unclear what specific issue or issues OP wants to solve or is experiencing
The querent has what is for many playstyles a perfectly reasonable desire to allow the players to track large amounts of items. It's unwieldy for a bunch of reasons, but of course there are techniques to mitigate the unwieldiness.
"Don't do that" gets rid of the overload, but is not the only way.
my reading is that what they actually want is a way of validating inventories that isn't very time-consuming so they can do it often and with low effort
to which it seems the obvious very simple answer is "just use spreadsheets for your inventory because you can make it add all that stuff up in nanoseconds"
this is probably something that's baked into dndbeyond
@Rubiksmoose I've only used encumbrance once, when the party was specifically looting very large and heavy things. Otherwise, just don't try to put a wagon in your backpack and there won't be a problem.
@Carcer yeah that is really a confusing way to put it and I'm really not sure what it was supposed to mean. You interpretation is certainly potentially valid.
So I am a beginner to dnd and I chose to be chaotic neutral for the freedom of basically doing whatever I want and I was wondering if I was starting to be "that guy?"
Hi, and welcome to RPG Stack Exchange. Please check out our questions to avoid asking and note that we don't handle questions about the behaviour of certain alignments. Protip though: if you think you might be having a bad effect on the game or making your fellow players uncomfortable, ask them, talk with them, and work through their concerns with them. — doppelgreener ♦57 secs ago
Can you do that? You don't have to be chaotic neutral to be able to do that. Would you do that? Not necessarily. Should you do that? Probably not. Will you do that? Up to you, to be honest.
but killing people without provocation/reason is textbook evil and it would be unreasonable to describe such a character as neutral in any sane interpretation of the alignment system
I am always ready to argue about alignments why am I like this
Even if we're talking about prescriptive alignment (alignment determines your actions), chaotic neutral doesn't mean you would kill and steal all the time, it'd be at your own discretion.
@kviiri I think it's just an easy way for them to define "personality" when experienced with exploring deeper RP. I don't mind it as a descriptor as long as it isn't too limiting on player choice.
Alternatively, that it's something the party should obsessively track. Eg. the GM telling that "your character wouldn't do that because they're <alignment>" which makes especially little sense in 5e where alignment doesn't really do a thing, except in some very rare circumstances
I first heard of the DnD alignment system in NetHack, where Chaotics generally do have a "do what you want" license. They do have their drawbacks, but they're mainly not-very-obvious, especially to a player who didn't get very far
eg. the other two alignments have a better choice of matching artifacts, like the ever-useful Excalibur or Mjöllnir.
Grapple is an attack, a special melee attack:
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them.
Because it's an attac...
🙋🏻♀️Hello! My name is Donna and I’m a UX (User Experience) designer here at Stack Overflow. Recently, Jon Ericson suggested that we share UX research updates so that the folks here can get more visibility into one of the inputs we use to make product decisions. Inspired by Dr. Julia’s bite-siz...
So I am a beginner to D&D and I chose to be chaotic neutral for the freedom of basically doing whatever I want and I was wondering if I was starting to be "that guy?" By that, I was hoping you know that people could tell me what counts as "that guy."
One example of a problematic incident was w...
@doppelgreener Arneson originally came up with alignments before the game was published, due to how some of his players were being backstabbers and such. See my answer to HeyICanChan's question about early D&D , pre D&D PvP.
@doppelgreener Yes indeed. Other ways of dealing with such things do exist.
@kviiri I will find a way to send you a housewarming present. But I may need to do some pondering first.