« first day (577 days earlier)      last day (816 days later) » 

7:09 AM
posted on January 24, 2022 by YMAkib

Hello, When I am trying to run my simulation of pouring ‘V’ shape particle in the simulation box, I am facing a problem like this: “Rigid body extent > ghost cutoff - use comm_modify cutoff”. Changing the cutoff distance seems not solving the issue. I am looking for any suggestions regarding the issue. Thank you. Regards, Yeasir Mohammad Akib UTRGV 1 post - 1 pa

 
 
2 hours later…
8:56 AM
posted on January 24, 2022 by Nostalgic

Hi, My simulation box contains two water box connecting with a carbon nano tube (CNT). So, I need to calculate viscosity in CNT. Hereby, instruction provided in Lammps documentation (section 8.3.6) cannot be helpful. Is there any suggestion to calculate viscosity in a defined region? Thanks in advance 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic

 
9:22 AM
posted on January 24, 2022 by pascalbrault

Dear all, I inform of an open postdoc position in my group for 1 year, possibly 1 year more, Starting next May. The topics is about molecular interaction of satellite debris erosion and the atmospheric re-entry. MD and DFT-MD simulations are planned for describing air interaction with various Aluminum alloys at temperature/velocities corresponding to atmospheric re-entry. Colla

 
 
3 hours later…
12:01 PM
posted on January 24, 2022 by Sriram_Krishnamurthy

Hi all, I am trying to simulate a bunch of patchy particles in Lammps. I have defined the patchy particle with two attractive patches (using small particles bonded to the central larger particle) placed on the opposite poles. Now, I use a fix rigid/small/langevin for the thermostat and use a fix defrom to do shear simulations. I find that using the rigid style blows up the simul

 
 
2 hours later…
1:46 PM
posted on January 24, 2022 by Mohammed_Alhissi1

Dear lammps user, My lammps version is 29 OCt 2020 . I am interested in simulating ellipsoid particles. However, for some reasons at the moment I am interested in setting all relative energy-well depths to be 1 , i.e., epsilon_x = epsilon_y=epsilon_z = 1 . With these settings, the matrix of relative energy-well depths will be reduced to the Identity matrix if the chosen energy s

 
2:13 PM
posted on January 24, 2022 by jeanc

Hello, I am running a phase equilibrium simulation where after compression and equilibration in a cubic box, the box is elongated 4 times the original length in the z-direction and temperature is quenched. Instantly, simulation was terminated with error message “ERROR on proc 1: Bond atom missing in image check”. I did some reading in the forum and found that I might need to incl

 
 
8 hours later…
9:44 PM
posted on January 24, 2022 by WJHuang

Hi, I am using the LAMMPS version of 29Sep21 on my mac and trying to compile it as a shared library and enable expectation and PNG support. I used the command below: make serial mode=shlib LMP_INC="-DLAMMPS_PNG -DLAMMPS_EXCEPTIONS" JPG_LIB="-lpng", It says: " 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic

 
10:44 PM
@Connor So far we've only included the MatSci.org LAMMPS forum, and the Matter Modeling Stack Exchange tag. Also, I didn't see your chat message until now, largely because I didn't get pinged with an @ symbol. I once brought up an idea to advocate for an "@channel" feature:
2
Q: Preparing for a feature request for chat rooms to have something like the "@channel" feature in Slack

Nike DattaniI'm going through the unanswered questions list to try to get things answered, and I found this: Setting multiple new atype/dtype/itype with LAMMPS fix bond/create, for which I'd like to ping all active members of the LAMMPS chat room to see if any of them have ever seen the issue brought up on t...

But people didn't seem to care much about it, so the best we can do is to just ping the users that are currently in the room (usually me and sometimes also some others).
11 people have posted messages in this room so far. If you have any recommendations about how we can make this room better, I'd be happy to hear them!
 

« first day (577 days earlier)      last day (816 days later) »