@Dcleve So we are back to the case where you think that it may be possible that two is numerically greater than three.

@polcott -- I spelled out the criteria that YOUR OWN PROCEDURE calls for, and you -- deflect? Be honest enough to admit to what your own presuppositions are. THEN -- admit you cannot meet them.

@Dcleve I coin the term {semantic tautology} to accurately describe the actual process of how terms acquire semantic meaning. The only reason that we know that three is numerically greater than two is that this relation has been stipulated by the definition of the set of natural numbers. Your whole argument seems be nothing more than you simply don't believe it.

@Dcleve You very persistently refused to acknowledge the distinction between a stipulated definition and an assumption. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipulative_definition