@lyxal ok I'm tryna do this: lyxal.pythonanywhere.com?flags=&code=%CE%BB%3A%3A%E2%88%91%…

is that codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/101448/…

@Razetime is that the challenge you're attempting?

because if it is, you might want to not for a bit

I'm currently debugging the interpreter because that challenge pointed out some flaws

flaws with the interpreter

i kno

yee

yeah ::∑$Π"Ḋ gives a 1 element array instead of a pair

not anymore

just gotta push and update

neat

@Razetime you're good to go now

btw I have a flagless 10 byte answer

it uses 0 indexing though

MD5 hash of my solution: 11c2bde12519c698ddd392e919798bf3

wat

my idea was λ::∑$Π"Ḋ;ȯt

@lyxal sorry, λ::∑$Π"ḊA;ȯt

ooh the online interpreter looks great now

yeah Lyxal has improved it a loot

@Razetime okay first of all :: -> D

Second of all, Try it Online!

@Razetime Try it Online! for 9 bytes

@UnrelatedString I restyled it to look like tio

I also added a way to stop sessions which would work online except pythonanywhere doesn't support multithreading

f

I only found that out after implementing it and getting it perfect locally

Lol

F

Yeah ikr

I am once again revising my vectorisation model

Because it's once again causing pain

Things weren't vectorising properly when explicitly vectorised

Currently I kind of have it working but not really

What does $ do?

Also is there a builtin for LCM?

@Ausername $ swaps last two elements in stack

But i can't find a built in for lcm

Hey also is there any builtin for binomial coefficient I.e. math.comb()?

By last two elements I meant top of stack

@Wasif ƈ does nCr

it's called choose

When I Y with dot with (a: number, b: list), the content of list cannot be seen when a is huge number. Is that the specification on online interpreter?

Was trying to beat the question with time limit

Do you mean Ẏ?

@Ausername not yet, but soon

@tailsparkrabbitear which question?

hThis: ttps://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/7/hamming-numbers/225238#225238

WTF the interface is

I mean: codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/7/hamming-numbers/…

Also 29bytes are too long

Hmm, on first glance I can see that there is potential to use a lambda here

But after testing this, it seems the while loop is faster

@tailsparkrabbitear I got it down to 25 bytes with no improvement on time unfortunately

Honestly, I'm not really sure how to optimise it, and I'm surprised (in a good way) that the while loop approach is faster than this

@lyxal so like why should I learn vyxal other than so it will stop following me (hopefully)